Remove 2p Sequential

Crissipos · Post by **Crissipos** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:28 pm

Nowadays a lot of people start a 2 player sequential game.. I think this option should be removed, since the player that can start as first most of the time gets an advantage

Risktaker17 · Post by **Risktaker17** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:34 pm

no I win tons of times as going 2nd

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:36 pm

fyi dont play 2 player sequential games if you suck enough not to win from 2nd :wink:

john1099 · Post by **john1099** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:49 pm

No one is forcing you to play.
So, don't play that option.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:04 pm

Crissipos wrote:Nowadays a lot of people start a 2 player sequential game..

I think that's a damn good reason why it should be kept. "OMG! People like this game type, let's take it away!" Use your head boy

Timminz · Post by **Timminz** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:20 pm

hecter wrote:
Crissipos wrote:Nowadays a lot of people start a 2 player sequential game..

I think that's a damn good reason why it should be kept. "OMG! People like this game type, (and I'm no good at it) let's take it away!" Use your head boy

Wwoody123 · Post by **Wwoody123** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:48 pm

Turn off unlimited fortifications and it becomes a lot fairer. Also, larger maps tend to negate the bonus so play on places like World 2.1

Optimus Prime · Post by **Optimus Prime** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:22 am

I WILL leave if 2-player games are removed. Simple as that.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:27 am

Optimus Prime wrote:I WILL leave if 2-player games are removed. Simple as that.

qft me too

cicero · Post by **cicero** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:40 pm

I WILL leave if Optimus Prime or lord voldemort leave.

I am a bit over emotional at the moment.
(The Infected Neutrals are coming ... <ad lib your own zombie-like moan here>)

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:37 pm

Wow - looks like this one went down like a lead balloon... 1 vote for the good - and I assume that's the OP.

C.

Chirondom · Post by **Chirondom** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:04 pm

It doesn't matter if it's sequential or freestyle, certain maps with two players whoever goes first will win. Recently, I played an Ages of Realms 2 player that lasted all of three rounds, with me taking one of the other guy's castle in the first round.

Sir. Ricco · Post by **Sir. Ricco** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:16 pm

I hate this idea. I mean I truly hate it. Unless the game starter is around when to game starts the person to last join the game has a big advantage.

treefiddy · Post by **treefiddy** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:58 pm

Crissipos wrote:Nowadays a lot of people start a 2 player sequential game.. I think this option should be removed, since the player that can start as first most of the time gets an advantage

In Freestyle, it will most likely always end up being the 2nd player joining (green) that will go first.

Removing Sequential (the only truly random draw for who goes first) would only make the problem you describe, worse.

tigar191 · Post by **tigar191** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:45 pm

no sorry man,ill give you a hint DONT TRY TO TAKE AWAY SOMRTHING CLASSIC

TaCktiX · Post by **TaCktiX** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:49 pm

Is there a point to removing a perfectly viable gaming mode? Just consider that for a second.

PLAYER57832 · Post by **PLAYER57832** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:13 pm

People play lots of these because they LIKE them!

They are short, you don't have to "sit" and watch like you do wth freestyle, but you can often finish a game in a short while if both people wish.

GabonX · Post by **GabonX** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:44 pm

Any more suggestions telling people how they can and can't have fun?

Risktaker17 · Post by **Risktaker17** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:38 pm

Yeah leave the option for people who like it

Crissipos · Post by **Crissipos** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:37 pm

ok, but the player who starts itsn't random, in most games it's the game creator, and I lose almost all 2 player sequential games I join
ok, maybe I shouldn't join those, but I just hate all those games people are creating, just hoping to get good points from them

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:42 pm

Crissipos wrote:ok, but the player who starts itsn't random, in most games it's the game creator, and I lose almost all 2 player sequential games I join
ok, maybe I shouldn't join those, but I just hate all those games people are creating, just hoping to get good points from them

where on this site did you read that pole position is not random ?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:44 pm

Crissipos wrote:ok, but the player who starts itsn't random, in most games it's the game creator, and I lose almost all 2 player sequential games I join

Therefore it's not all games, therefore it must change sometimes, therefore it's random. Ta da! Case closed!

Kilazul · Post by **Kilazul** » Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:51 am

I agree. Don't play that style 2p game then. Why remove the option from those that like it.

Remove 2p Sequential

Should the 2p sequential game option be removed?

Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential

Re: Remove 2p Sequential