Worst "well rated" player I've ever seen
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
- buckman341
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:08 pm
- Gender: Male
Worst "well rated" player I've ever seen
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1888623
You're looking at "Rliles" who is yellow in this game. Somehow he made it to Sergeant First class with 54 positive comments and zero negative but that's about to change.
Basic rundown, I just started playing recently so I see a game with a colonel and 2 captains vs 2 sergeants and I figure "well why not, i'm sure they have a basic grasp of strategy, we would stand a chance" so I join.
Well we got a ridiculously good drop. Pink owned 3/4 in Australia and yellow owned something like 5 in North America. I had stacks on Ontaria, Greenland, and Iceland.
Now in my mind, the play here is obvious. You take australia as a team and you allow me time to fortify my armies out of North America onto Iceland (they were all connected) which will make a nice stack for defending and giving yellow the chance to take the rest of North America.
Yellow (rliles) saw differently. He basically refused to drop any armies on australia, even when the opposing team was throwing everything they had at it to break it (which they did repeatedly). Not only that he was attacking MY STACKS of 3 in north america refusing to wait for me to move them out.
To make matters worse he seems to have no idea of the basic concepts of Risk. He owns Alaska, NW, Alberta and western US. Blue hold Kamchatka. You would think logically he would leave armies in Alaska but no, that's the first place he takes armies out of. Of course blue walks in and takes Alaska from him.
That's where his colossal ineptitude really gets great. He has spent the last 3 turns in our game trying to kill the 2 armies blue left in Alaska. However, he doesn't just drop 3 and attack once and then wait for next turn. No. He attacks all the way down to 1 army. He attacks 4v2, get's double defense, then goes 2v2!!!!! If you don't believe me check the logs. Hilarious.
Meanwhile red, green, and blue, our opponents, are dropping everything they have against Australia and probably having a great laugh about our useless teammate.
Sorry I just had to vent.
You're looking at "Rliles" who is yellow in this game. Somehow he made it to Sergeant First class with 54 positive comments and zero negative but that's about to change.
Basic rundown, I just started playing recently so I see a game with a colonel and 2 captains vs 2 sergeants and I figure "well why not, i'm sure they have a basic grasp of strategy, we would stand a chance" so I join.
Well we got a ridiculously good drop. Pink owned 3/4 in Australia and yellow owned something like 5 in North America. I had stacks on Ontaria, Greenland, and Iceland.
Now in my mind, the play here is obvious. You take australia as a team and you allow me time to fortify my armies out of North America onto Iceland (they were all connected) which will make a nice stack for defending and giving yellow the chance to take the rest of North America.
Yellow (rliles) saw differently. He basically refused to drop any armies on australia, even when the opposing team was throwing everything they had at it to break it (which they did repeatedly). Not only that he was attacking MY STACKS of 3 in north america refusing to wait for me to move them out.
To make matters worse he seems to have no idea of the basic concepts of Risk. He owns Alaska, NW, Alberta and western US. Blue hold Kamchatka. You would think logically he would leave armies in Alaska but no, that's the first place he takes armies out of. Of course blue walks in and takes Alaska from him.
That's where his colossal ineptitude really gets great. He has spent the last 3 turns in our game trying to kill the 2 armies blue left in Alaska. However, he doesn't just drop 3 and attack once and then wait for next turn. No. He attacks all the way down to 1 army. He attacks 4v2, get's double defense, then goes 2v2!!!!! If you don't believe me check the logs. Hilarious.
Meanwhile red, green, and blue, our opponents, are dropping everything they have against Australia and probably having a great laugh about our useless teammate.
Sorry I just had to vent.
- Shatners Bassoon
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: corner
- Contact:
-
Knight2254
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Scott-Land
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm
- buckman341
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:08 pm
- Gender: Male
Knight2254 wrote:TheBro wrote:You guys are still gonna win though.
Yup, it would seem that way if they don't f it up
Rliles is TRYING to f it up tho
I would be my RIGHT nut that Rliles will ignore me completely, deploy on Alberta and attack himself down to 1 army again. We'll see what happens.
- oggiss
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:43 am
- Location: Sweden - Probably the best country in the world
buckman341 wrote:Knight2254 wrote:TheBro wrote:You guys are still gonna win though.
Yup, it would seem that way if they don't f it up
Rliles is TRYING to f it up thoyou watch. I just begged him in team chat on my hands and knees to deploy on Siam this round. I would bet my left nut that red is going to deploy on china again this round in preparation for green attacking siam yet again.
I would be my RIGHT nut that Rliles will ignore me completely, deploy on Alberta and attack himself down to 1 army again. We'll see what happens.
Seriously, i would be so mad at that guy
Record - 3582 p rank - 6 General
- buckman341
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:08 pm
- Gender: Male
- buckman341
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:08 pm
- Gender: Male
