Bring It On!!! [Winners: HighlanderAttack & Lufsen75]

jako · Post by **jako** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:06 pm

lol, u put up quite a fight. besides, when it comes to 1vs1, its all luck. so plz, dont challenge me, i need a break after those 2 challenges plus an upcoming one of my own. :wink:

Rallyraider · Post by **Rallyraider** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:14 pm

nah, iam not gonna challenge you again.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:15 am

i challenge for british isles

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:34 am

I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to.

I make this game later lord.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:51 am

Lufsen75 wrote:I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to. I make this game later lord.

sorry bud..i forgot to check thread for round 5...didnt wanna miss.
plus i own zony 1v1

j/k

its fine though take your time

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:55 am

lord voldemort wrote:
Lufsen75 wrote:I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to. I make this game later lord.

sorry bud..i forgot to check thread for round 5...didnt wanna miss.
plus i own zony 1v1 j/k

its fine though take your time

Now all current cahllenges have their games and Pm sent.

zobots · Post by **zobots** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:43 am

1995274, 1995272

zobots successfully defends AoR: Might.....

I challenge for AoR: Magic

tokstolle · Post by **tokstolle** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:43 pm

banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front

Good luck (you will need that).

Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:58 pm

tokstolle wrote:
banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front

Good luck (you will need that).

Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.

No challenge are late until the round are gone.

tokstolle · Post by **tokstolle** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:29 pm

Lufsen75 wrote:
tokstolle wrote:
banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front

Good luck (you will need that).

Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.

No challenge are late until the round are gone.

Only for you to set up the challange then.

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:12 pm

New maps are added on the list. But the will not be able to claim. I have set up one game on each map with 8 people to join (7 cause I have joined all). password for them all are "newmap". Here are the maps and gamenumber:

Netherland - 1997945
Prohibition Chicago - 1997964
Sovjet Union - 1997971

TheKidsTrumpet · Post by **TheKidsTrumpet** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:28 pm

Soviet Union/Netherlands have only 6 slots left, I think I'll bow out of prohibition Chicago, it looks quite intimidating

jako · Post by **jako** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:38 pm

did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh :evil:

TheKidsTrumpet · Post by **TheKidsTrumpet** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:50 am

jako wrote:did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh :evil: :(

I'll have to agree with ya there. Not a fan.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:22 am

i defend duck and cover...
and me and zony are locked at 1 a peice (most likely)

TheKidsTrumpet · Post by **TheKidsTrumpet** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:37 am

=updated maps/titles chart with the new maps=

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:58 pm

jako wrote:did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh

I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.

Sir. Ricco · Post by **Sir. Ricco** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:00 pm

I defended Age of Magic.

BaldAdonis · Post by **BaldAdonis** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:52 pm

Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.

Original American rules use escalating.

Lufsen75 · Post by **Lufsen75** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:58 pm

BaldAdonis wrote:
Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Original American rules use escalating.

Original Swedish rules then. But anyway. This is standed in the first post.

TheKidsTrumpet · Post by **TheKidsTrumpet** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:45 pm

Lufsen75 wrote:
BaldAdonis wrote:
Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Original American rules use escalating.

Original Swedish rules then. But anyway. This is standed in the first post.

This is true, we kept a lot of what Coleman had originally because it worked so well. No complaints, just fun. May the best "Champ" win.

jako · Post by **jako** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:02 pm

i thought american rules used esc/chained?

Kinnison · Post by **Kinnison** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:30 pm

Nah, Esc/Adj. I know many people who PLAYED chained, but that wasn't the rules.

TheKidsTrumpet · Post by **TheKidsTrumpet** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:40 pm

Kinnison wrote:Nah, Esc/Adj. I know many people who PLAYED chained, but that wasn't the rules.

What he said.

Daring Overlord5 · Post by **Daring Overlord5** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:41 pm

i wish to challange for american civil war
that is all