Golfe du St. Laurent[FD,G,GP,FF]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
So much talk about PEI. Yes P.E.I. stands for Prince Edward Island... so who cares? If it looks neater with just PEI, then do it, if it doesn't look neater, don't do it...jeeze.
Also, where's the monkey? There's lots of room for him on the map... maybe he should have his own territory that can't be occupied by anyone except the monkey. And it can be a random territory every game....eh? No? You should add a poll: Who think the monkey should stay....haha, j/k
Also, where's the monkey? There's lots of room for him on the map... maybe he should have his own territory that can't be occupied by anyone except the monkey. And it can be a random territory every game....eh? No? You should add a poll: Who think the monkey should stay....haha, j/k
Hmm... a smaller map like this one is likely to see a lot of two, three, and four player games. With a low number of players the likelihood of somebody starting out with a small, 3 territory bonus region is pretty high. This in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is cause for concern when the bonuses for the little regions are so high.
Looking at the bonuses, I see that a three territory region gets a +3, a four territory region (with more borders) gets a +3, the five territory regions get a +3, and an eight territory region gets a +5. In general, I'd say that if there is one region that presents a clearly advantageous start something needs to be done.
Looking at the bonuses, I see that a three territory region gets a +3, a four territory region (with more borders) gets a +3, the five territory regions get a +3, and an eight territory region gets a +5. In general, I'd say that if there is one region that presents a clearly advantageous start something needs to be done.
- Unit_2
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A, North America, Earth, Milky Way, Universe.
oaktown wrote:Hmm... a smaller map like this one is likely to see a lot of two, three, and four player games. With a low number of players the likelihood of somebody starting out with a small, 3 territory bonus region is pretty high. This in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is cause for concern when the bonuses for the little regions are so high.
Looking at the bonuses, I see that a three territory region gets a +3, a four territory region (with more borders) gets a +3, the five territory regions get a +3, and an eight territory region gets a +5. In general, I'd say that if there is one region that presents a clearly advantageous start something needs to be done.
So make the three territory worth +2, the four the same(+3) 5 +4, 8 +6?

-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
I don't have much to say... perhaps you could tweak a couple of borders slightly for clarity. There's room at the Halifax-Acadian Coastal-Fundy Coastal border to increase the length of the border a touch.
Other than that I don't have any problems with this. I'll flip through the thread later and see what the talk has been about.
Other than that I don't have any problems with this. I'll flip through the thread later and see what the talk has been about.
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
-
Lone.prophet
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Your basement Muahaha
- gimil
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)
edbeard wrote:The Nunavik legend colour matches the newfoundland colour on the map more than Nunavik
The newfoundland legend colour seemingly doesn't appear anywhere on the map except the legend.
I think it's a problem and it's not good to figure out what part of the map is which by the process of elimination.
I see it too . . .
What do you know about map making, bitch?
Top Score:2403
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Top Score:2403




