Holysox and lord levi [public alliance]

Blue Geers · Post by **Blue Geers** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:27 am

Alliance in 3 player game

users: Holysox and lord levi

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1398041

Comments: The game normally attacked each other until lord levi suggest one to alliance to eliminate one to fasten the game as his own unreasonable reason. I ignore lord levi's wording by Holysox make alliance to eliminate me. At that moment, all of us had a balance armies. This action is very unfair in 3 player game.

Blue geers

Post by **TeeGee** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:06 am

It might appear unfair, but they announced it as required by the rules.

There is no rule at CC to say 2 players can't form an alliance in a 3 player game. Alliances are part of CC and something we all have to live with, whether we agree or disagree with them.

If you don't like there tactics, all you can do is add them to your ignore list and you will never have to play them again

skaterchild3 · Post by **skaterchild3** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:00 am

it is quite normal for an alliance in a 3 player game to be formed if one player get's to powerful, normally it's until they force him down a bit to mkae it even.

Blue Geers · Post by **Blue Geers** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:04 pm

Ok thank you, I think the unfairness is because we have a balance armies and someone suggest alliance. If the case that 2 player make alliance with notice in the beginning, I think this is not the 3 player game.

Blue Geers · Post by **Blue Geers** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:12 pm

skaterchild3, I am agreed with you that it is a normal case if one is obviously powerful and 2 player make alliance. But in this game, 3 of us have even armies and no one is powerful. The reason for the alliance is that one need to fasten the game as his own unreasonable excuse. I think their alliance is worse than the secret alliance.

kingprawn · Post by **kingprawn** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:33 pm

No matter how unfair you think the alliance is if it has been stated in chat then they have done nothing wrong. It happens all the time.

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:29 am

It's a good case for negative feedback and ignore list, because many people wouldn't like to play against opponents like that.

Blue Geers · Post by **Blue Geers** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:22 am

what i can do is now put them in my ignore list, thank you!

Blue Geers · Post by **Blue Geers** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:20 am

For this unfair game, I let another one also lose the game. In other words, there are 2 players include I have negative feeling.

jpcloet · Post by **jpcloet** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:10 am

Interesting argument. You did miss only 1 turn and the excuse of "hurry up, my wife is pregnant" is kind of lame. You do have a right to be upset.

I'm going to assume that he's known about this for sometime. I would suggest either honorably tanking the game or only joining speed games if you're in a hurry.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:00 am

jpcloet wrote:Interesting argument. You did miss only 1 turn and the excuse of "hurry up, my wife is pregnant" is kind of lame. You do have a right to be upset.

Oh man, I'm gonna use that as an excuse in all my games from now on.