Napoleon Ier wrote:If you look at the scientific evidence, frankly it is ridiculous to think of a "gay gene" or other such straw men which may as well be concocted by violent leftist extremists during a magic mushroom session to make themseleves seem more rational.
Show me that scientific evidenc please, kthnx?
I believe, from simple observation, that more homosexual leaning behaviours (there are no gays as such, rather a broad spetrum of sexuality,
You keep saying this but I see no actual evidence for it. Besides, it's not of any importance whether that is true.
which most people would agree on except your average lobotomized politically correct citizen of the month like snorri who insists on a magical gene that scientists in Lapland discovered whilst drilling in the arctic ice)
Actually, I'm not saying there is a gay gene as such. Sexuality is probably contained within many genes which all make a difference.
are simply the result of a psychological problem created by enviromental factors.
Proof?
true, I can't blame gays for hat. I don't. I'm not a "teh gays iz goin tah hellz111" type person,
You sure sound like one.
just somebody who believes that it is because of the lack of virility encouraged in modern society that weak and pathetic individuals resort to homosexuality as a psychological defense mechanism or to resolve their teenage identity vs. role confusion conflict.
Didn't you say you don't actually know any gay people?
As such, it is an undesirable product of a sick, perverted society that thrives within it, and all gay feelings which exist to varying degrees in everyone must be purged. My opinions are largely derived from the works of a fascinating journalist, Eric Zemmour, if you're interested...
Well obviously if you base your views on science from the writings of an anti-feministic, anti-human rights journalist instead of actual scientists, you have the edge in scientific debate.
