I don't claim to be good at the game. But I know I nearly left the site after my first couple of games because somebody openly admitted to suiciding into me because it looked like I might win. It isn't a good look. It obviously isn't a problem that would affect those of a higher rank.

It rather ruins the game that our scoring system contradicts the play to win incentive of an individual game.

Reading the chat. Not sure I like the attitude of picking on the newbie, even if that is sub-optimum strategy to protect your long term points haul.

I swear every forum on the internet has a zeus equivalent.

Zeus the four most recent posts in GD are you setting up threads to just bitch about stuff. It's a bad look.

My take (not that anyone cares but that is what forums are after all):

- The regularly deadbeating member should be warned/punished or something
- Teegee has correctly apologised for any suggestion of lying
- The original accusation in C/A was justified.
- No evidence has been presented that TeeGee ...

Is this the most depressing thread idea ever?

Simple. By doing that you're just bypassing the fog of war by letting others know about stuff they shouldn't see. If you want everyone to see the whole board you can play sunny games. I personnally am fine with people being vague about troops (saying player X has twice as many troops as you, a 3 ...

I don't understand why that would be considered unsportsmanlike at all. I am sure someone somewhere has a reason.

IcePack wrote:Unsportsmanlike, but not against the rules. Blue is wrong.

Why is it even unsportsmanlike? If two players are working together they can share info about troop placements surely.

Sounds like it could lead to madness. Sounds fun.

Can I get training plese.

Hi all,

I just bought premium and thought I would try out the speed game function. Anyone fancy a game? Game 18861700