vtmarik wrote:This forum will always be Off-Topic Topics in our hearts, the external name is unimportant.

Yes, but I'm thinking about the newbies, not just us. And on the contrary, I'm sure a lot of us would indeed like "Off Topic Topics" back... At least I know Caleb and I would.

Yeah, you're right. Was that before or after "The Water Cooler"? I'll edit when I know.

I was formerly against "Caleb the Cruel" on this matter when this section was changed to "Social Lounge." I thought it a proper name. I did. But I did not know it would change twice afterward. First " Off Topic Topics ." Then " Social Lounge ." Then " The Romper Room ." Then " The Water Cooler ...

No, Marik is pretty funny sometimes. Here he might not be, but I've seen some good woppers once in a while from him.

Sorry I haven't replied in a while; I was originally going to bring it back up myself on Sunday, but I also wanted to post responces to both this and the "Bible Contradictions!" thread at once, so I wouldn't have to go back and forth with it later. I was occupied during the week and on Saturday ...

Sorry I haven't replied in a while, for I was occupied during the last two weeks. It is explained on the "Evolutionary Contradictions" thread about why I haven't replied in such a long period. Let us continue...

Truman this thread is pointless.

Many people believe the bible contradicts itself ...

You know, money isn't the root of all evil. Money is a good thing. Money can be used for all kinds of purposes for good.

...

And what does money have to do with women anyway?

You still haven't answered every scripture I posted, save two. Still, you have not read what I wrote, and your slandering again (what a surprise). Shall I post it yet again for you to read, or should I consider asking your address and sending you the book series called "Hooked on Phonics"? "It's ...

The "Gospel of Matthew" is attributed to the apostle Matthew, but historians (i.e. people, not necessarily non-Christian, who look at it from an unbiased perspective) believe it was written by someone else. They date it a few years after 70 CE, which is the earliest date they believe the gospel of ...

That whole Val Kilmer thing you got going on is just wrong on so many levels.
and what are doing showcasing your religious insecurities for? getting all aggressive under the pretense of being defensive. Nobody cares what you belive in, anyone who is secure enough and takes comfort in their belief ...

Does the "r" that comes after "lotr" stand for "risk" on the second choice?

True. You can actually go further and say that the Christians Truman refers to are wrong as well.

Where does this hatred for every word I post come from? Every time I throw your argument away (and prove you wrong about anything for that matter) you throw out mindless insults at me. Why?

As for ...

Whether or not you agree with the Dogma of the Catholic church, how can you say it is not part of the Christian belief system?

The Catholics were not the "first" Christians if you truely consider what happened right after Jesus' death, with the apostles and all.

It isn't part of the Christian ...

Hi guys. Sorry I didn't reply in a while, I was occupied during the week. Here we go...

Again, "where is the way the light dwelleth" - seems to me the light is dwelling, not travelling. But then again it's only YOUR INTERPRETATION.

It's like you read one word and then kick it out in the same ...

Wouldn't a ghost like you have better things to do than post messages on a Risk website? Like, go haunt a house or... look at some woman in the shower.

I tried looking at it like it was an alternate-image picture, the ones where you have to look at it in a certain way and a picture appears in 3D, but that didn't work, so I'm stumped.

Pilate, haven't you been reading the discussion Vtmarik and I have been having about it?

Obviously anything yet to take place cannot be verified, so how's about a prediction made in the past by creationist theories that has been verified and which at the same time hurt the case for evolution?

And at the same time hurt the case for evolution? Ok, now we're getting specific ...

Duh. In the Hebrew, the word "kill" in this passage translates to "rashhach" which means "to murder." Simple.

Name me one prediction that creationism makes about the natural world that is not immediately falsifiable.

What exactly do you mean by "prediction"? Do you mean:

"a prediction based on what happens on earth normally (weather patterns, erosion rates, etc.),"

"a prediction concerning earth ...

A shrine dedicated to a mad scientist in the middle. (:lol:)

Anymore contradictions I can answer? So far I've held up the Bible as having none. I'd like to see some. Really, I would.

Creationism as a theory was superceded by evolution a long time ago, and people moved on. Except you lot. Carry on clinging to these ideas in the face of all available evidence and ridicule from every serious scientist on the planet - no one cares but you.

Wow.

Let's have a study lesson of what ...

I love this quote that gives a perfect example of how any evolutionist is close-minded:

"...I don't need to defend my beliefs against people like Truman here who has the incessant need to attack those that aren't like him in some kind of projection of his own insecurities about his beliefs ...

You ask a question, I provide information, and you draw your own damn conclusions.

Vtmarik I provided facts for what each organ was for in reality and all you had to say was that it used to be (long ago and far away) something else without scientific data to back it up.

This thread is about ...