Yes, CC is declining because it's a piece of shit website.
When you consistently get screwed by dice it becomes obvious this is a waste of time and money.
Too many 'coincidences' happen in game play for it not to be true that there is nothing random on this piece of shit website.
Not to mention if ...

To everyone else.. Donald and I play teams games... and we haven't done to well with them.. so if you're looking at our history and you see a lot of games, you might want to click the game. It's teams games.. their whole basis of accusing us of cheating is that we play games together, nothing else ...

bob... let's talk about you and blue.. you were getting 30+ reinforcements the majority of the game.. you held the middle of the map, blue held a total 6 bonus bordering you directly to your S/E. A 6 bonus v a 30+... and you never hit blue one time. Not once. He held the corner, which most players ...

I mean heck.. this thread is full of suggestions to change ratings, talks about obsessions, broken ratings systems.. blah blah blah.. so here's my unrelated post..

The ratings is a great aspect of CC,, the people who think it's broke need to work on their own comprehension as any way you display it ...

I read this thread and another thread of changing the ratings system.. both seem to be way off course of what I suggested..

I'm simply suggesting putting the same table of averages you see at the top of the 'Ratings Received' page to the top of the 'Ratings Left' page.

To me, it just makes sense ...

Concise description:

⋅ When viewing ratings left on player ratings details, add the average of the attributes table to the top just as when viewing your own ratings.

Specifics/Details:

⋅ Add this to the 'Ratings Left' tab:
Attribute Average
Fair Play Star 4.7 (rated by ...

Thanks for the reply..

A couple other things to consider is if one player can't trade easily while others can, he's going to cost at least one player some troops, which would then make the 2 more vulnerable. The only possible stalemate is if ALL remaining players agree to swap 1, which would be ...

It doesn't prevent it 100%.. but it would ad a variable to the strategy of the game you didn't include in your example, which would be players would position themselves to make it difficult for other players to trade 1. You could win just by being the last player to successfully win a territory. So ...

I'm well aware there's more than 1 way to end/ prevent / whatever stalemates.. this type game would create a game where all have to fight. I probably should have included in the description this option would encourage all out fights and thus an increase of warring strategies since it seems all the ...

I'm well aware there's more than 1 way to end/ prevent / whatever stalemates.. this type game would create a game where all have to fight. I probably should have included in the description this option would encourage all out fights and thus an increase of warring strategies since it seems all the ...

Concise description:
Mandatory war games would be an option to discourage or actually eliminate stalemates in games with the mandatory war option selected.

Specifics/Details:
The 'Mandatory War' option would be in the list of game options and the 'Mandatory War' setting would either be 'Off ...

Yes, this is true.
I have played Many a (board game..on a table) )game of Risk. It has always been Assault, Assault, Assault (with outstanding results)!!!

To focus on attack (like you would on a table game) will result in your downfall.
Conquers Club is not the same as Risk, gots to play it a ...

thx for this great info,
so much to learn
i was always afraid to attack 3 vs1 or 3 vs2, i should do this more often

For a 3 v 2 attack, you have to have a min of 4 in the territory you are attacking from. One army can't be used in attacking due to it has to remain in the territory.
If you only ...

This old saying came to mind.. opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.

Each human has one asshole.
Opinions are like assholes.
Therefore, each human has one opinion.

Is that an a=b=c thing? Never put the math to it before... there's like 7billion people in the world so I just never even ...

I've been in plenty of games where truces take all the competition and fun out.
I've never been in a game with no truces that was not competitive and fun.
Truces make me angry.
Truces suck.

This old saying came to mind.. opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.

Vaduz, from your post it looks like you've decided to change your strategy to attacks that are not in your favor, even if the dice were perfectly random.. I'm not sure I understand how you disagree strategy can be more effective than luck (or dice rolls) and then decide to change your strategy to ...

Something to consider is there are many other strategies involved in this game. Some don't rely so heavily on luck of dice / drops, altho that is of course a big part. If someone really believes the only way to win is if the dice are in your favor, drops are in your favor, and you play first then ...

WWII Poland is my favorite so far.

Hey All,

I would like to apologize to anyone I may not have offended in game chat at any time in the past. I know that I have said some offensive things to people out of frustration but I do fail to slur and belittle some peeps. I am working hard to offend everyone when it comes to in-game chat ...

My opponent just rolled 16 (sixteen) 6's in a row. I sat there in awe as my huge stack that went against a measly 4 stack was dwindled to nothing.

And then to top it off I then looked at my dice stats for my last 10 battles and it showed me as +10%

So not only are the scamclub dice completely ...

I agree with everything you just said.. but as someone who does not have the understanding of statistics and how to calculate them as you do, to me, you're trying to apply the #2 definition to the #1. Your opinion is they compliment each other, but if you take the definitions literally, they ...

The way I see it, a 'true' RNG could be defined as either having absolutely no order by the first definition, but to meet the 2nd definition, you'd have to have order.. to quote you, it is necessary. Back to how all this relates to CC, due to we see a common trend in the 2's and 4's among all ...

Hmm.. it seems to me the 2 definitions of random conflict with each other. The first definition states without aim, reason, or pattern but the 2nd definition, when applied to statistics, sets out to put order to the process of selection. However, by definition, the 2 definitions conflict.. which ...

"I don't think you have a very good understanding of what you are saying" - guilty as charged. I have no background in mathematical or statistical analysis, it just interests me which is why I posted here. No need to apologize.. The idea of a true RNG being next to impossible is from all the science ...