I will send you pm with instructions on how to proceed.

Please add me.

I had it do the same thing to me by the way. Took my money for another 3 months of membership when I had never renewed and never played a single game after those 3 months.

I still say we should bring back flame wars and anyone that was banned from back then should be unbanned (i.e. Norse, BKbarunt).

You could always just limit invites to private games, that way you can tell if someone is attempting to farm the lower ranks.
Damn man, that is the smartest thing seen in this forum for a long time. Limit 1vs1 games to private.

Then people can set a password and send the password to the low ...

Sometimes people have arguments in games and they need to duke it out on the forum. That is the great purpose of flame wars.

It was so much fun when there was a flame wars forum here. We need to get it back. Too bad so many of those people are banned now.

I remember when Norse got permabanned and there was outrage about it. It seemed like management was determined to never let him back. I wonder if they would let him back. I doubt it though.

I just lost game 13987850 because of the server. I had bad lag yesterday. Too bad Conquerclub won't fix their server.

Not only does the lag screw up my game, it also screws up my entire internet connection and I had to reset my computer.

Time to get a real server. This is ridiculous.

gannable wrote:wrestler, havent you been gone for like 4 yrs?

havent seen you in a long time

Yeah I've been here a few times since 2009, before I started playing here regularly again.

Dukasaur wrote:There are numerous NRs who sign join games and never take a single turn. Thus, zero % of turns taken is actually quite common overall.

Conquerclub may want to do more to keep people playing after they first join.

I'd like help just with getting a higher rating. Clarification on strategy I should use in 3-player games, and how to play with escalating cards in 8+ player free-for-all games.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

wrestler1ump wrote:Who has the lowest rating? And who has the lowest number of turns taken?

I think it's you.... Considering you have never risen above cadet.

I have been above cadet. My range of should be higher. I made it to Sargeant 1st class in the past.

I also want to apologize to anyone I offended back in the day. I was pretty bad back then.

Who has the lowest rating? And who has the lowest number of turns taken?

I got on a lot of foe lists in 2008 and probably am still on many that foe'd me then, but it really doesn't matter. Like someone else here said, there are thousands of other people to play with and if I'm on someone's foe list for a multiplayer speed game I can just start a game of my own.

I think you'll need a much bigger ratio of yes to nos to convince the moderators to change the rating system. I would look for an 80% in favour of change if any changes were to be made.

Go back to feedback but have it not moderated. This will mean some unfair feedbacks but it will be consistent for everyone.

Or allow people to give each person they play a negative, neutral, or positive. Then they can still use the words that are currently used.

Anything is better than this rating ...

I think it's horrible what they are doing. Humans do not seem to care about causing suffering to other animals.

One bad meal humans eat is balut, which is a chicken egg that has a partially-grown chicken inside it.

I have no issue with the ant colony because the ants would die almost immediately upon being touched by the molten aluminum, possibly sooner because of how hot the hole would get. The rock-like animal though and all other animals I wish humans would just kill first.

True, it is about whether there is the capacity for pain. But doesn't every nervous system bring the capacity to feel pain?

Also this is not an actual rock nor is it a plant species. It's technically an animal. I don't know why people keep saying that it is a rock.

People call this thing a rock, but technically it is living and they acknowledge that it is living. So whatever it is, is it cruel to slice it open alive, given that it probably has a nervous system?

http://grist.org/list/crazy-living-rock ... ever-seen/

They should delete everyone's ratings and tell them to actually rate according to what the scale means, rather than just giving 1's and 5's. Or they could change the system to allowing players to give everyone they play a positive, neutral, or negative.