AWESOME... can't wait for it to begin..

Is there any possibility of a Conquer TEAM Cup in the future?

a new thought for Unlimited Adjacent Fortifications

Basically same rule as Adjacent... but it can be done multiple times on your turn. trick is that when a fortification is made between 2 territories, that would be the end of movement for those troops. that way you can't run a continuous line as ...

I think Unlimited Adjacent Fortifications would be a better option to add...

Basically same rule as Adjacent... but it can be done multiple times on your turn. trick is that when a fortification is made between 2 territories, that would be the end of movement for those troops. that way you can't ...

love this idea. gonna try it soon. ......
any possibility of unlimited Adjacent Fortifications... the ability to fortify troops from any one territ to an adjacent territ... but instead of just once... you can do it for any territory that has troops. each territ would only be able to move to one ...

im down... lets play

Maybe this has been mentioned but was wondering if anyone thought of new Fortification options...

I think we could use an Unlimited Adjacent option.
basically, giving all troops a 1 territory movement rate during fortification.
kind of a weaker form of unlimited fortifications.

Thoughts?

or ...

even though i have messed up a turn a few times because of this I still love the clickable maps ... good job guys. considering the problems ive heard could it be optional like how map size and color codes work, with the ability to turn it on or off per map.

anyone????

Game 8658856
Doubles
Automatic
Sequential
Map - First Nations Americas
spoils - Flat Rate
reinforecements - Unlimited
Fog - No

Game 8568109
Doubles
Automatic
Sequential
Europe 1914
No Spoils
Unlimited

World 2.1, triples, Sequential , Auto, flat rate, unlimited, prepare to lose!!!

I do wish that the one-way between the Control Tower and California were a two-way. You can control well over half the map with Oklahoma (assuming that you get the left side and upper side of the map).

Cliff

good point... that choke point is big. a player owning the upper/left part of the map ...

If we do anything I think we should go back to the previous map or perhaps reduce the bonuses -- Something like +1 for 2, +2 for 3, +3 for 3. This would allow you, if you did not get the AA bonuses (then you're probably loaded with planes), to have a fighting chance.

It seems there are msany who ...

Why can't the suggestion from the discusion be used... +1 for 2 planes, +2 For 3, etc. Unless im mistaken this would be the middle ground between the new an old version... and I seem to remember a few posts suggesting this idea. or was there some reason against this?

Game # 6235745

USA Apocalypse - doubles - nuclear - anyone?

If the goal is to make larger maps and place the info Below...why not try this.
3 tables of info... Game info, Players with spoil count and the Stats as an option
Leave the My Spoils directly below the map and above the Combat Di buttons

My Spoils ([bracketed] if owned): g:Constantinople b:Bohemia ...

Overall i like the changes.., except, for the stats now at the top of the map.
why cant we have that info on the side above the names... there is plenty of room And leave the spoils directly below the map and above the Combat box like before

Game 6132524
Round 1
[refresh map] [smaller map ...

looks to me like most people agree with the last 3 posts... 2 planes +1, 3 Planes +2, etc. etc. can we get a version with this and get some play testing?

got to agree with some people here.. it was great as it was. we mostly played a 2 vs. 2 because of the map just like certain maps lend themselves to certain game types better than others.

but if you are gonna change it Why not continue the scale of bonuses for the planes.
+1 any 2 aircraft, +2 any ...

not sure if this was already mentioned..... i still think there is alot of wasted space below the player names. even if there were 8 players. why not place the game info there. game type, fortifications, etc. that would save some vertical space and the horizontal space would not change at all. but ...

love it.. although I think it could maybe benefit from a better layout.

what if you made the Game # a little smaller (maybe put it with the game stats below the map).
then move the Round Number stat up. that would add some room.

then maybe you could place the game statistics below the names... and ...

5556131 - double Sequentil Flat Rate Chained

5572508 - New World - Triples Flat Rate Unlimited

5552243 - triples - flat rate - unlimited

5509027 - triples, flat rate, unlimited, Waterloo