yeti_c wrote:

hulmey wrote:opinions are like farts, every1 has one

Jesus christ - get the quote right... your version just doesn't make sense.

It's

Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one.

C.

I have a fart stored in a jar by the door. You know, in case of emergencies.


Doesn't everyone?

Exactly. So why not just re-establish the old system without the ability to complain/overturn bad feedback? Seems like a no-brainer to me. But of course, I've been saying that all along.

I find it difficult to believe the admins get less complaints about the new system and it's abuses/flaws, than they got for negative feedback. It seems an ego thing to me.

well just dont renew your premium and show 'em what YOU want

Half my clan arent bothering to renew their premium coz of the BS here. I have heard a new risk site sponsored by "hasbro" will be opening soon

Yup, sadly enough, the true impact of this decision won't be fully realized for several ...

A month gone by and it still sux. Thanks for listening.

Someone suggested a week ago that the Amazon model of feedback: use averaged stars, but display the comments for each assessment would be a good one. I still think that by marrying the current functionality with the ability to leave and respond to feedback is a solid one.

When you rate a person ...

Two weeks in, and yup, it still sux.

suck it up cupcake

Real moderators material, this one.

it won't happen overnight... people have to run their memberships out and not renew... that's when they will realized they screwed up.. but it will be too late

And to all you mods who support this and are telling us it's for our own good... WE'RE the ones who make this community run... what we ...

Day Whatever of this and I still don't like it at all--even though I have a 5.0 rating.

Bring back feedback!! If it's not done, in some form that allows comments at least, I will NOT be renewing my premium membership again.

Agreed... I will not renew either

That $100.00 worth of income lost in ...

i want little animated marines and tanks aswell as f16 flyin when i attack someone.

woh youre right - it is easy just to say it and wish it was true!

hehehe, you are correct!

but i don't, with all honestly, think anyone cares enough to insist upon a change mate!

People will bitch and moan ...

i want little animated marines and tanks aswell as f16 flyin when i attack someone.

woh youre right - it is easy just to say it and wish it was true!

hehehe, you are correct!

but i don't, with all honestly, think anyone cares enough to insist upon a change mate!

People will bitch and moan ...

Fireside Poet wrote:

millertime13 wrote:He is so concerned about the violence that plagues our society that he chooses a user name killerkevin, GENIUS !

Games: 12 Completed, 4 (33%) Won

He's on his way to a massacre even now.

Yeah, but how would you Rate him?

What the public doesn't seem to take a moment and digest is the amount of time it takes him to code it in, make sure it works for all the browsers (and even then it isn't perfect sometimes), test it, fix it when the test breaks it, test it again, fix it again, and then, finally have it right ...

Hound wrote:

InsomniaRed wrote:Imagine that...ANOTHER topic about the new rating system....

This is getting a bit old.

and yet no real response from the powers that be other than "live with it."

MYSTERY SOLVED...

I find it far more irritating to play with Russian-roulette types. You know, they don't take anything, just choose SOMEBODY (seemingly at random) and use the whole game just to wear them down.

I'm using it, I'm just giving everyone who isn't a total asshat 5's on everything.

Much much worse. The Admins clearly have no idea what value a good feedback system added to the game. They wanted it gone and rushed out an il-designed and poorly executed non-solution.

Tommy Tucker wrote:As for myself, if I have no strong feelings against a player I am going to give them 5s across the board. I've tried giving 3s and just get PMs from them complaining....

There. Simple.

The movement is spreading....

Give me as much as one single, solitary VALID reason not to rate anyone with all 5's, and I will accept it and never rate with all 5's again. Thus far, you have offered no valid reasons, just your personal rating preferences. Those preferences are fine for you; you are free to rate how you like ...

the rating is just nothing more than a random star generator.

Sure. In the first 3 days. Eventually it'll average out, and will be a decent system for the most part. Granted, the average will probably not be 3, but more likely 4, or so. But once it's had some time to gather more ratings, you will ...

Dude, yer bumming my high.
See? He can't resist being a bitch.
that was in response to your calling him a stoner, and it's funny... and you have yet to learn that
name calling is not par in the GD. now you call him a "bitch"? i hope a mod sees this thread and you are politely asked to refrain ...

78 out of 78 players that deserve a 5? i don't think so. either he's playing only with the very elite players (and i don't mean skills) or he is just hading out random 5's which is abusing the system.
where does it say you can't hand out 5's like they are candy or blow at lack's parties?-0

Join ...

The whole thing is a sham.

First, if you don't have the marbles to put your name on specific criticism, (like the old system), then you need to kindly shut the f@ck up. If you're a snot-nosed crybaby who can't handle losing, you can post a set of ones, put me on your "ignore" list, and never have ...

First of all, I suggest we roll back the old version without arbitrators. See if your ideas of gloom and doom if the almighty mods aren't involved actually come to fruition. It's just a theory the place will fall to pieces, there is no hard evidence it will really happen.

If it does happen, then ...