The two player games are great (I have yet to try Real Time-Freestyle -- that would be wild!!
I am not, however a big fan of the new ranks. A little to heavy on the enlisted side. I don't think it's very credible for a private or corporal to be in command of an army the way this is represented ...
Search found 3 matches
- Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:39 am
- Forum: Announcement Archives
- Topic: [30-May-2007] Two player games
- Replies: 135
- Views: 84823
- Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:11 pm
- Forum: Archived Suggestions
- Topic: Cards - Wild
- Replies: 3
- Views: 735
Cards - Wild
I don't know if it's been suggested (or if it's possible) there should be 2 wild cards.
- Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:10 pm
- Forum: Archived Suggestions
- Topic: Ranking System (Officers only)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 574
Ranking System (Officers only)
I think the minium rank should be officer. It's hard to image a Private or Sergeant in command of a whole army.
I suggest : Cadet, Lieutenant, Captain, Major, Commander, Colonel, Brigadier, General, Marshall
or something like that.
I suggest : Cadet, Lieutenant, Captain, Major, Commander, Colonel, Brigadier, General, Marshall
or something like that.