I'll play.

I really dig on auto, seq, unlimited and no spoils.

Well, in the original game [Ok, someone has already said that this isn't meant to be exactly like the original, but at least consider...], deployment is sequential, so one player's deployment is supposed to affect the next player's decision. If we really wanted it like the original, deployment ...

why is it so important to win an australian gaming contest? I do think its cool, however, that CC is second only to a game that has nearly 3.5 million registered users and CC sits at almost 20,000 on its scoreboard. Does CC get a cookie ftw?

and I hate to be a retarded nerd huffing book reader, but Andy, how did you get to Mexico? Aren't you an ape?

anyone had any turtle soup? and if so what kind of turtle, whered you eat and why? Did you eat its turtle brains?

All you Need is Love

why in the HELL cant you file a grievance against yourself??!! I just pissed myself off and I shouldnt play with myself anymore

Thats what yall get for trying to raise your score. Long Live Mediocracy!!

zorba_ca wrote:Those both work. Or even to allow team members to go one after the other: 3,4,5,6,1,2, or 5,6,3,4,1,2 or 3,4,1,2,5,6, or 5,6,1,2,3,4.

So long as the spacing between team members is the same for each team.

I think I have a better sequence: 7,4,8,4,5,9,5 or 2,8,5,8,5,38,2,0.