Would it be ok if I retired this acount and switched to another?

The changes are all right exept for the double turns one. I find that to be a little extreme.

Dont be so sure about that. Steve has quite a large number of acounts. I forget most of the names.

How is that unfair? If you good enough then you can learn how to make sure that your territory is secure no matter when someone starts their turn or when they end it. This new rule is just dumbing down the game for those that are to lazy to learn how to deal with holding.

Look I know that people have complained allot about holding and I can see why. But a one hour timer? Personnnally I think that the timer should be gotten rid of all together. I cant say that I had been acustomed to holding that much (acsept when I forgot to end my turn) but at least extend the time ...

Yes but doing so is illegal.

*drools*

Holding is for bitches who need to cheat. just because lack hasnt figured and implemented a choosen way to shut this down doesnt mean it is a valid tactic.

And a rule against holding is babying players through the game. Really name one thing about holding that is cheating? You have 24 hours to do ...

Also there are several people who find it hilarious to hack into people's e mail acounts by using the password bypass question which is built into many mass e mail systems such as hot mail.

Well out of the ones that are not world leaders all ready I would say India because they seem to have absorbed the best of eastern and western culture. They are living what some would call "the American dream".

So whats your favorite map? My personel favorite is the US just because I have come to know it so well during the time I've been playing.

Even with no double turns allowed holding is a viable tactic. By holding you can retain all your origanal troops which you would have gotten at the beginning of your turn. Also it allows you to effectively counter-attack against your enemies moves. If you cant stand the heat then get out of the ...

I frankly do not see a problem with holding. Its a viable tactic.

Multi-party systems are better because they provide the organization that is lacking in a pure democracy and they negate the harmful abuses of power that occur in single party governments.

I post at both. I'm known as Gladius though now...

Ahh ok that makes since. I'm Swordsworn on that forum in case you were wondering.

As I have told you many times I've abandoned the Gladius acount to a friend. It dosent even really matter since I dont have the password anymore allthough the acount is still registered to one of my email addresses.

Social Darwinism isnt something that you are "for" or not. Just like you cant be "for" evolution because its a proven fact (Lets just leave that debate for now). Social darwinism, in essence, is the belief that the rich will push the poor off (not intentionaly) as to control the population. It is ...

2? Try 5.

Hmmm.... I dont supose you're from AoMH are you Romber?

I could get my hands on a better sized one but it would have to be sized down. Anyone interested?

I think that if lackattack descides to hand out modships then it should be his pick. People should not have to apply.

I'm sorry about this. Yes I did origanally play under the name of Gladius until I switched to Famous Agent after giving Gladius to a friend. Then one of my friends at school (boxcar or destroyer666 I believe he also has several other acounts descided to play a prank on me and the friend who I gave ...

Hmmm... this list seems like a good idea but there needs to be some type of qualification for the people who are acusing. I think that a code of conduct and a team of moderators.

Even so it would still be unfair. Many times we play against each other.