Breaking an alliance abruptly isn't bad form. In fact it is very cunning.

This is what people should consider that any alliance is informal and can be turned against at any moment.

I don't get why breaking an alliance warrants a grievance? It's the good ol Operation Barbarossa backstab.

has anyone tried this? I would think it might be interesting. Would you be blocked from playing with yourself? 0_o

"I'm filing this grievance against myself just because I can do it! Victimless crime!"

Varies.

I think we should have an extra fortification option - limited fortifications that depends on how much armies someone has in total, and how many countries.

type in ifconfig - it should tell you your DHCP server's address right there.

Is it permitted to file a grievance against someone who refuses to communicate?

I mean, teammates who are on your team, and won't even respond when we ask them to me should not be playing at all if they can't communicate with us.

Refusing to fortify is one thing, ie. "I have a better idea ...

Singapore.

Yes, but this can only happen within 10 seconds, say, of the actual mistake. Or 15. (Depending on connection).

Actually, I was multi-tasking; sorry about that. I was playing several other online games (chess, etc.) and editing on Wikipedia at the same time (admin duties on there).