for a stronger one.

* Suggestion Idea: Get a more powerful server.

* Specifics: What's to be specific about? Timing out my connection when I have strong connections across the board is irritating. Evidently there are enough people and usage to warrant getting a larger server.

* Why it is ...

I'm done here for the evening ladies, as I have to eat some tasty venison, and even tastier cake.


So, until tomorrow, keep your panties on.


Also, cocks.

So you managed to avoid answering my point, then...

Your point is a non-point. When evaluated on the face of it, it only presents a moral conundrum which points to a voluntary society as the solution.

The state, through mass participation, can act to limit monopolies and corruption.

This is ...

there are "market anarchists" who are actually anarchist.

Which I am. Market Anarchist, and Anarcho-Capitalist are interchangeable, or didn't you know? I just prefer rejecting "capitalist" because it is often associated with todays corporatism and mercantilism, when Capitalism is nothing of the ...

Voluntary interaction (contracts, jobs, etc.) aren't antithetical to anarchsim. I don't equate bosses with exploitation either, as you choose who to contract your labor and time too. There is no coercive process behind finding and choosing an employer.

Also consider that companies have less leeway ...

So you managed to avoid answering my point, then...

Your point is a non-point. When evaluated on the face of it, it only presents a moral conundrum which points to a voluntary society as the solution.

The state, through mass participation, can act to limit monopolies and corruption.

This is ...

stop equating libertarian and anarchist thier not the same

To the contrary. Anarchism is the logical outcome of libertarianism, a full realization of the NAP.

You and bike boy don't seem to grasp that.

no anarchists are radicals whow ant to abolish government whereas libertarians simply want ...

i'm none of those things. and it really shows how little an understanding you have of modern day anarchists. but since you're not one....

Son, don't give me that "no true scotsman" fallacy horseshit. When left with nothing, all you have are your personal attacks and "that's not anarchism!" clap ...

Voluntary interaction (contracts, jobs, etc.) aren't antithetical to anarchsim. I don't equate bosses with exploitation either, as you choose who to contract your labor and time too. There is no coercive process behind finding and choosing an employer.

Also consider that companies have less leeway ...

Well la-de-da! Nice to see somebody who isn't remotely stuck up their own arse for a change. If you can't deal with my questions then there's no harm in saying so, but there's really no need to get so defensive about it.

>.>

Here, perhaps this will be more to your liking:

Are you honestly ...

Tyr wrote:stop equating libertarian and anarchist thier not the same

To the contrary. Anarchism is the logical outcome of libertarianism, a full realization of the NAP.

You and bike boy don't seem to grasp that.

I personally am a Market Anarchist. I believe the most moral societal system is a system that functions purely on a voluntary, non-coercive scale in line with the Libertarian NAP and the concept of Natural Rights. The State by its very nature is an abomination that disregards these rights and ...

The State is a monopoly on services, and I have to pay, no matter what! I cannot choose a different service, I can not choose to not use a service, I have no say. I am forced to participate in a monopoly.
Dude you're so right! Screw this current democratically answerable institution that has made ...

Although you've not yet answered my original post,

I haven't forgotten. I honestly couldn't explain the origin of the State, but myself and my friends are fielding arguments around it. When we come up with a definitive answer (might be tonight, might be a few days), I'll get back to you, I ...

I personally am a Market Anarchist. I believe the most moral societal system is a system that functions purely on a voluntary, non-coercive scale in line with the Libertarian NAP and the concept of Natural Rights. The State by its very nature is an abomination that disregards these rights and ...

I'm not sure everyone understands what anarchism is so here goes. Anarchism is a peace and freedom movement. It's about organization without coercion. It's a word that's been purposely misused and given a dual meaning over the decades in an atempt to confuse the public and discredit anarchists and ...

I'm afraid people naturally exploit other people. Whatever system you have isn't going to change that. At some point we had no 'state' at all. You have to be able to explain why we developed the state before you can argue for its abolition.

That's ridiculous. That's like saying "you need to be ...

From what you just said, it is an assumption. You've assumed that the only possible solution is no state. That's fine for you, but don't act like you're proving anything, because you're not giving "reasons," you're just countering our posts.

It's either "State" or "No-State". There is no between ...

I personally am a Market Anarchist. I believe the most moral societal system is a system that functions purely on a voluntary, non-coercive scale in line with the Libertarian NAP and the concept of Natural Rights. The State by its very nature is an abomination that disregards these rights and ...

Dancing Mustard wrote:

MarketAnarchist wrote:Trick question: Government is institutionalized terrorism, so it doesn't make a difference.

Parlez vous l'bollox monsieur?

>.>

I'm afraid people naturally exploit other people. Whatever system you have isn't going to change that. At some point we had no 'state' at all. You have to be able to explain why we developed the state before you can argue for its abolition.

That's ridiculous. That's like saying "you need to be ...

From what you just said, it is an assumption. You've assumed that the only possible solution is no state. That's fine for you, but don't act like you're proving anything, because you're not giving "reasons," you're just countering our posts.

It's either "State" or "No-State". There is no ...

Snorri1234 wrote:Anarchism is awesome. Too bad that, like communism, it fails to consider who it is dealing with.

People?

Oh wow. He was serious then... Just tell him to get his arse back to CC. While you're there, ask him about Jamie. Thats a good yarn. He really should make a return. The conspiracy theory stuff around at the moment is possibly the most humerous CC trend yet.

Wilco. Did he start the "conspiracy ...

Meh. I read The Dispossessed. Great book. Nice idea, on paper.

I thought Jesse Bad Boy had come back.

just out of interest, is there a clique of anarchists who surf the web, posting 'Anarchy: leet or WTF' threads and then replying with things things like 'straw man' and 'your position, sir, is ...