gotta say, i've never really participated in the community but thebest seems like one of the nicest and most humble conquerers yet

pw please?

3rd time i've broken 2500, and i'll only join games once i get a stable score above 2500

In about 1 in every turns I get these really bad dice. The odds of them being that bad are about 1%. That's ridiculous, that should never happen. How can they call the dice random.

Well, technically, they should happen about 1% of the time. Technically.

I do have to admit ive seen far more 5s ...

pass please

forgot the pw

wb oliver

group 24 update:
game 3, from first to last -

tracedout
zissou
bjonte
s.d. bolts
ir0nclad
general flashman
mgall
egel

could use a game 5 in queue, everyone seems to be here

shoot

can i switch to classic art? i haven't played actively in awhile and forgot about classic shapes

tracedout
2295
classic
standard
escalating
don't really care, though i prefer unlimited

The simple elegance of the third one is fantastic, from the papyrus effect to the hieroglyphic font. It's an absolute travesty that it's not winning, let alone in last (what!).

Oh this would get me playing again. I'm down

my suggestion in another thread:

round down.

If Conquer Club wants to throttle question mark/low rank abuse they should just have scores round down. As it is, you get a whole point from a player if the 20*theirscore/yourscore formula has a decimal place. so if you get 5.01 points from a player ...

i finally made colonel...i love you all

i'm thankful i don't have any classic games up currently so i don't have to look at that map, and i also don't feel like the site owes me anything as i'm a wretched freemium, but i'd still like a new classic map up sooner rather than later. i've made all of my points there.
Change....is not always ...

i'm thankful i don't have any classic games up currently so i don't have to look at that map, and i also don't feel like the site owes me anything as i'm a wretched freemium, but i'd still like a new classic map up sooner rather than later. i've made all of my points there.

i admit it; i skimmed through all 69 pages of this thread.

oh insomnia.

edit: insomnia, the unfortunate condition, not the lass with the previous post

God loves his children, yeah.

(I saw these guys in Mass. the 13th, good times)

leaving the easy card is just basic cooperative game theory

sometimes it helps you more to help someone else. sometimes it doesn't.

Would someone mind PMing me a password, please?

chip would there be any way to indicate your average score and your opponent's average score, basically the components that go into this stat? to be honest i think they'd be more valuable than the actual stat.

No, sorry. If that were possible, then I would have just presented the opponent's ...

chip would there be any way to indicate your average score and your opponent's average score, basically the components that go into this stat? to be honest i think they'd be more valuable than the actual stat.

Think it's kind of dumb, simply because it's using relative rank. Saying that a Field Marshall regularly beat Majors would convey the same result (that the average opponent they beat was less than half their score, or about half their score), but wouldn't put them as a noob farmer/point hoarder ...

if you stare at the map long enough you can see the future

If Conquer Club wants to throttle question mark/low rank abuse they should just have scores round down. As it is, you get a whole point from a player if the 20*theirscore/yourscore formula has a decimal place. so if you get 5.01 points from a player, you actually will be credited with 6 points.

If ...

If Conquer Club wants to throttle question mark/low rank abuse they should just have scores round down. As it is, you get a whole point from a player if the 20*theirscore/yourscore formula has a decimal place. so if you get 5.01 points from a player, you actually will be credited with 6 points.

If ...

hey guys, i'd be interested in high ranked games, if anyone needs an extra man. i typically play 6-8 man sequential escalating.