Rights
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:06 am
You are allowed to pick one human right for your country to enshrine the protection of in its legislature. Gogogo.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=226896
No, the first one is a government that provides everyone with economic and physical security.KoolBak wrote:Wouldnt the first one be communism / socialism? Just wanna clarify....
So Duk, basically you want economic & physical security, AND personal freedom of speech and behavior, ...but only for your chosen few, just like on CC, right?Dukasaur wrote:The whole thing is a false dichotomy. You won't keep one very long without a reasonable quantity of the other. Nor can either be absolute. A reasonable balance with a good quantity of both protections is my goal.
Only in developed nations. The two options seem more like two pieces of a step-by-step plan to prosperity.Dukasaur wrote:The whole thing is a false dichotomy. You won't keep one very long without a reasonable quantity of the other. Nor can either be absolute. A reasonable balance with a good quantity of both protections is my goal.
Depends on how you interpret it. Basic economic security can also be accomplished through a strong healthy jobs market.KoolBak wrote:Wouldnt the first one be communism / socialism? Just wanna clarify....
So Duk, basically you want economic & physical security, AND personal freedom of speech and behavior, ...but only for your chosen few, just like on CC, right?Thorthoth wrote:Dukasaur wrote:The whole thing is a false dichotomy. You won't keep one very long without a reasonable quantity of the other. Nor can either be absolute. A reasonable balance with a good quantity of both protections is my goal.
''Oh NO?!?"riskllama wrote:careful there, skip - it's them very same oligarchs that are standing between you and the permaban hammer right now...Thorthoth wrote:So Duk, basically you want economic & physical security, AND personal freedom of speech and behavior, ...but only for your chosen few, just like on CC, right?Dukasaur wrote:The whole thing is a false dichotomy. You won't keep one very long without a reasonable quantity of the other. Nor can either be absolute. A reasonable balance with a good quantity of both protections is my goal.
That is called oligarchy.
Almost, the one truly inalienable right is the Right to Be Dissatisfied. Everything else is either a privilege or a crime, depending on P.O.V.armati wrote:YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS - George Carlin
https://youtu.be/hWiBt-pqp0E
Amenarmati wrote:YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS - George Carlin
https://youtu.be/hWiBt-pqp0E
Finally, the black Jesus has arrived on CC!theblackjesus wrote:Why not both?
You'd think owen would have jumped on that name just so no one can have it.Neoteny wrote:I am legit shocked that username was available.
waauw wrote:Depends on how you interpret it. Basic economic security can also be accomplished through a MILITARY.KoolBak wrote:Wouldnt the first one be communism / socialism? Just wanna clarify....