Conquer Club

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Postby MTIceman41 on Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:21 pm

Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

Link to Clan War

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation
Last edited by MTIceman41 on Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:06 am, edited 45 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:34 am

You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:31 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby IcePack on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:34 am

Wow S+M vs FOED in Round 1, tough draw but fun to watch!
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Captain IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16783
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:51 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:02 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?

Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:24 am

I was just referencing your editing skills. FOED are good indeed.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:34 am

MTIceman41 wrote:Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation


FOED Agrees
User avatar
Colonel JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 07, 2017 4:08 pm

Updated...S&M home maps created, sent out, and under link
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Wed May 10, 2017 8:47 pm

All games created and joined.
All player counts are within rules.
Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:

GL all, it will be a close one
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby IcePack on Wed May 10, 2017 8:51 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:


I got this quite a bit on our set too lol
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Captain IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16783
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (1) vs (0) FOED out of 21

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 14, 2017 11:27 am

First blood: Game 17423063
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Conchobar on Sun May 28, 2017 2:05 am

MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<
Image
User avatar
Colonel Conchobar
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 28, 2017 7:21 pm

Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<


Solid clan then, and solid now...hell no not another 1 game loss...

Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Conchobar on Mon May 29, 2017 2:23 am

MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<
Image
User avatar
Colonel Conchobar
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Fyrdraca on Tue May 30, 2017 11:14 pm

Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<


While neither game is definitely over yet, we are going to need help from the dice to have chance in either. Honestly I think we played the Conquer Man game about as well as we could have going second. I'm sure we could have made some slightly better moves here and there, but I feel pretty good about our play.

As for Actium, ugh. I realized a round too late (which of course in unlimited is huge) that our strat wasn't the right one for the particular game settings. I will say that we did have some bad rolls at crucial times, but not enough to completely change the outcome. Going first however and having a sizable lead early on, if we lose I'm gonna stew on that for a while.

Regardless, I think we gave josko and company a tough fight in both games, and I'd be interested to hear their assessment of our competition.

Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
User avatar
Brigadier Fyrdraca
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:39 am
Location: Missouri, USA
3232

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (9) vs (8) FOED out of 21

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:47 am

Looks like S&M will have this by 1 or 2 games depending on North America.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:57 pm

Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)
User avatar
Colonel JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:18 pm

JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:53 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:43 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.

:lol:
(If you don't get it, look at the bracket ;) )
User avatar
Colonel JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4r] Rd 1: S&M (12) vs (9) FOED out of 21 S&M WINS

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:02 am

All games completed 12-9 final score.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Postby groovysmurf on Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:03 pm

Privileges removed, databases updated, topic moved.
User avatar
Colonel groovysmurf
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH


Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users