Conquer Club

Comments: multi...

seriously? you can't even be bothered to fill out the form anymore? ha!!!-Jésus noir

Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

I expect the response:

GRANDCRU

comments: multiple accounts

___________________________________
Look on my works...

Seriously, fill out the report properly next time or it will be deleted.

I will however look into this since it would never do to have a possible multi run free.

grow up... i've done enough of these to know that there isn't a point to filling out a multi-report

there are other facets of cheating that require evidence that I as a player can provide... but a multi is something that you're only going to bust if their IP addresses hit with someone else, and they can't explain it...

I'd be curious if you could show me an instance where someone was busted for being a multi where their IP addresses didn't prove it, and you guys just went on overwhelming evidence that players provided...

so, ease up with the "more proof" thing... I am not new to this. good luck and ty for looking into it


but i suppose i could have at least done this Grandcru

and for that i apologize

KraphtOne wrote:grow up... i've done enough of these to know that there isn't a point to filling out a multi-report

there are other facets of cheating that require evidence that I as a player can provide... but a multi is something that you're only going to bust if their IP addresses hit with someone else, and they can't explain it...

I'd be curious if you could show me an instance where someone was busted for being a multi where their IP addresses didn't prove it, and you guys just went on overwhelming evidence that players provided...

so, ease up with the "more proof" thing... I am not new to this. good luck and ty for looking into it


but i suppose i could have at least done this Grandcru

and for that i apologize

I think we'd just like to see what it was that made you think they were a multi. Presumably they have to be multi with another account, so do you have any suspicion as to who that might be?

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

owenshooter wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

Curious to see which one is this "once". Coz he accused me of being a multi once, and he was wrong

Donelladan wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

Curious to see which one is this "once". Coz he accused me of being a multi once, and he was wrong

mmmmmmmmmm no i didn't ! but i will say i thought you were french, not German... forget which proxy you're supposed to use? oh zing!

p.s. you do not need to respond to my trolling jokes m'am

Donelladan wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

Curious to see which one is this "once". Coz he accused me of being a multi once, and he was wrong

Or are you forgetting on which account I accused you of cheatin... oooooh no no no, no no no.... Alright, K1 out...

and if you kids give so much of a damn about what led me to believe the Cru is a cheatins then click on his name and take a guess which game it is that made me question him...

but you don't have the time you say? well you're trolling C&A threads, i think you've the time...

KraphtOne wrote:

Donelladan wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

Curious to see which one is this "once". Coz he accused me of being a multi once, and he was wrong

Or are you forgetting on which account I accused you of cheatin... oooooh no no no, no no no.... Alright, K1 out...

and if you kids give so much of a damn about what led me to believe the Cru is a cheatins then click on his name and take a guess which game it is that made me question him...

but you don't have the time you say? well you're trolling C&A threads, i think you've the time...

Okay, so the game that suggests he is a multi is Game 15256758. Not convinced but I suppose it's worth a look.

Thankfully clangers, nobody gives a f*ck if you're convinced or not.

Well I did some research into this track record and found some interesting results. One there have been around 18 cases of multi accusations of those 10 were cleared, 7 were busted, and one was closed. The case Donelladan refers too was not specified as a multi case and KraphtOne even specified that he did not believe it was a case of multis but stated as something weird. In that case the other player accused seems to have been connected to multiple accounts. Also the form is there for a reason it might be a pain in the ass bureaucratic reason such as human services forms, insurance forms, etc but they serve a purpose in having a standardized procedure.

iAmCaffeine wrote:Thankfully clangers, nobody gives a f*ck if you're convinced or not.

...or about your trolling, so you may as well desist. It only demeans you.

clangfield wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:Thankfully clangers, nobody gives a f*ck if you're convinced or not.

...or about your trolling, so you may as well desist. It only demeans you.

My constructiveness in this thread is on par with yours right now. Your secondary comment is an opinion which, thankfully clangers, nobody gives a f*ck about.

Also, your attempt at continuing my post into yours made no sense. Well done!

Major.Bossman wrote:Well I did some research into this track record and found some interesting results. One there have been around 18 cases of multi accusations of those 10 were cleared, 7 were busted, and one was closed. The case Donelladan refers too was not specified as a multi case and KraphtOne even specified that he did not believe it was a case of multis but stated as something weird. In that case the other player accused seems to have been connected to multiple accounts. Also the form is there for a reason it might be a pain in the ass bureaucratic reason such as human services forms, insurance forms, etc but they serve a purpose in having a standardized procedure.

Yeah used to bust all the time, but these days people are smart enough to wait till they've moved to a new IP address. But you will notice almost all cases had some fairly concrete evidence as to why I thought (knew) these players were multis... And in 2 cases I recall people were cleared and later busted for being multis after they knew they were in the clear

So these days I've wised up and just "here's the guy cheating" bust him if you can, if not then f*ck it

I tend to just PM a multi hunter rather than bother with all this. Lost count of my personal tally, big thanks to BG.

And as you have seen my track record in dealing with busting multis lately then you'll see my sense of humor in the original post of this thread I'm a funny guy...

This guy, btw... Is for sure a multi... 1 second Atttacks and waited till last 20 seconds to take turns in a 3 player freestyle game (making sure to end within last 3 seconds to get a card)... Nobody in the history of conquer club joined a 1 minute freestyle multiplayer as their 2nd game ever and can say they did that...

I am guessing this Game 15256758 is the one you are referencing. I agree with you that those actions are suspicious especially when after being called out on being a multi this player has not returned to the site. Regarding the other things you stated it is a shame cheaters are getting smarter and more careful. However I think we have different ideas of humor.

Major.Bossman wrote:However I think we have different ideas of humor.

This. This went without saying

KraphtOne wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:However I think we have different ideas of humor.

This. This went without saying

Yeah one of you is funny.

Donelladan wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Major.Bossman wrote:Could you give some proof or what inclined you to suspect this player of being a multi?

see... that is the thing... i completely get what you are all saying... however, i believe he has been wrong like ONCE in my memory... he has a pretty good track record... anyway, i always just love when my man pops up and throws the gauntlet down...-Jésus noir

Curious to see which one is this "once". Coz he accused me of being a multi once, and he was wrong

This was before you created your additional accounts. Or you had more than one(once) multi.

KraphtOne wrote:Comments: multi...

boom...-Jésus noir