Page 1 of 4

4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:35 pm
by Falkomagno
i dont get it. What is the issue with that.?

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:42 pm
by hecter
Child porn.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:44 pm
by Timminz
hecter wrote:Child porn.

and nuthin' but

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:47 pm
by alex951
I would recommended that you never ever go on that site. It will corrupt your mind.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:54 pm
by Falkomagno
I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:55 pm
by SultanOfSurreal
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


4chan's servers are buried underground

hope this cleared things up a bit

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:02 pm
by alex951
Your probably looking in the wrong place but don't look for it and there are lots of disturbing subject on their also

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:04 pm
by Snowgun
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".

And as Alex says (who seems to know a LOT about 4 chan ;) ) imagine a bunch of teenagers running the zoo, and imagine the type of shit they come up with unsupervised.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:06 pm
by SultanOfSurreal
Snowgun wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".


when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:08 pm
by Falkomagno
it sounds like a really dangerous place...i thought it was something geeky manga thing...

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:14 pm
by Snowgun
SultanOfSurreal wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".


when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything



For those too lazy to check, here is some stuff from wiki


Through its association with Anonymous, 4chan has become associated with Project Chanology, a worldwide protest against the Church of Scientology held by members of Anonymous. On January 15, 2008, a 4chan user posted to /b/, suggesting participants "do something big" against the Church of Scientology's website. This message resulted in the Church receiving, by its own reports, more than 6,000 threatening phone calls. It quickly grew into a large real-world protest


Internet attacks
See also: Anonymous (group)#KTTV Fox 11 news report and Sarah Palin email hack

Users of 4chan and other websites "raided" Hal Turner by launching DDoS attacks and prank calling his phone-in radio show during December 2006 and January 2007. The attacks caused Turner's website to go offline. This cost thousands of dollars of bandwidth bills according to Turner. In response, Turner sued 4chan, 7chan, and other websites; however, he lost his plea for an injunction and failed to receive letters from the court.[42]

KTTV Fox 11 aired a report on Anonymous, calling them a group of "hackers on steroids", "domestic terrorists", and collectively an "Internet hate machine" on July 26, 2007.[43] Slashdot founder Rob Malda posted a comment made by another Slashdot user, Miang, stating that the story focused mainly on users of "4chan, 7chan and 420chan". Miang claimed that the report "seems to confuse /b/ raids and motivational poster templates with a genuine threat to the American public", arguing that the "unrelated" footage of a van exploding shown in the report was to "equate anonymous posting with domestic terror".[44]

On July 10, 2008, the swastika symbol (卐) appeared at the top of Google's Hot Trends list—a tally of the most popular search terms in the United States—for several hours. It was later reported that the HTML numeric character reference for the symbol had been posted on /b/, with a request to perform a Google search for the string. A multitude of /b/ visitors followed the order and pushed the symbol to the top of the chart, though Google later removed the result.[12]

Later that year, the private Yahoo! Mail account of Sarah Palin, Republican vice presidential candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election, was hacked by a 4chan user. This followed criticism of Palin and other politicians supposedly using private email accounts for governmental work.[45] The hacker posted the account's password on /b/, and screenshots from within the account to Wikileaks.[46] A /b/ user then logged in and changed the password, posting a screenshot of his sending an email to a friend of Palin's informing her of the new password on the /b/ thread. However, he forgot to blank out the password in the screenshot.[47] A multitude of /b/ users attempted to log in with the new password, and the account was automatically locked out by Yahoo!. The incident was criticized by some /b/ users, one of whom complained that "seriously, /b/. We could have changed history and failed, epically."[48] The FBI and Secret Service began investigating the incident shortly after its occurrence. On September 20 it was revealed they were questioning David Kernell, the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell.[49]

The stock price of Apple Inc. fell significantly in October 2008 after a hoax story was submitted to CNN's user-generated news site iReport.com claiming that company CEO Steve Jobs had suffered a major heart attack. The source of the story was traced back to 4chan.[50][51]

In May 2009, members of the site attacked YouTube, posting pornographic videos on the site.[52] 4chan claimed responsibility for the attack, one member told the BBC that the attack was in response to YouTube "deleting music".[53]

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:18 pm
by alex951
SultanOfSurreal wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".


when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything


Ummm possibly exposing hundreds of kid to porn via youtube. Leaking personal info. And other stuff I don't feel like typing out using my phone.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:19 pm
by SultanOfSurreal
Snowgun wrote:Through its association with Anonymous, 4chan has become associated with Project Chanology, a worldwide protest against the Church of Scientology held by members of Anonymous. On January 15, 2008, a 4chan user posted to /b/, suggesting participants "do something big" against the Church of Scientology's website. This message resulted in the Church receiving, by its own reports, more than 6,000 threatening phone calls. It quickly grew into a large real-world protest


yeah that totally amounted to something

Internet attacks
See also: Anonymous (group)#KTTV Fox 11 news report and Sarah Palin email hack

Users of 4chan and other websites "raided" Hal Turner by launching DDoS attacks and prank calling his phone-in radio show during December 2006 and January 2007. The attacks caused Turner's website to go offline. This cost thousands of dollars of bandwidth bills according to Turner. In response, Turner sued 4chan, 7chan, and other websites; however, he lost his plea for an injunction and failed to receive letters from the court.[42]

KTTV Fox 11 aired a report on Anonymous, calling them a group of "hackers on steroids", "domestic terrorists", and collectively an "Internet hate machine" on July 26, 2007.[43] Slashdot founder Rob Malda posted a comment made by another Slashdot user, Miang, stating that the story focused mainly on users of "4chan, 7chan and 420chan". Miang claimed that the report "seems to confuse /b/ raids and motivational poster templates with a genuine threat to the American public", arguing that the "unrelated" footage of a van exploding shown in the report was to "equate anonymous posting with domestic terror".[44]

On July 10, 2008, the swastika symbol (卐) appeared at the top of Google's Hot Trends list—a tally of the most popular search terms in the United States—for several hours. It was later reported that the HTML numeric character reference for the symbol had been posted on /b/, with a request to perform a Google search for the string. A multitude of /b/ visitors followed the order and pushed the symbol to the top of the chart, though Google later removed the result.[12]

Later that year, the private Yahoo! Mail account of Sarah Palin, Republican vice presidential candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election, was hacked by a 4chan user. This followed criticism of Palin and other politicians supposedly using private email accounts for governmental work.[45] The hacker posted the account's password on /b/, and screenshots from within the account to Wikileaks.[46] A /b/ user then logged in and changed the password, posting a screenshot of his sending an email to a friend of Palin's informing her of the new password on the /b/ thread. However, he forgot to blank out the password in the screenshot.[47] A multitude of /b/ users attempted to log in with the new password, and the account was automatically locked out by Yahoo!. The incident was criticized by some /b/ users, one of whom complained that "seriously, /b/. We could have changed history and failed, epically."[48] The FBI and Secret Service began investigating the incident shortly after its occurrence. On September 20 it was revealed they were questioning David Kernell, the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell.[49]

The stock price of Apple Inc. fell significantly in October 2008 after a hoax story was submitted to CNN's user-generated news site iReport.com claiming that company CEO Steve Jobs had suffered a major heart attack. The source of the story was traced back to 4chan.[50][51]

In May 2009, members of the site attacked YouTube, posting pornographic videos on the site.[52] 4chan claimed responsibility for the attack, one member told the BBC that the attack was in response to YouTube "deleting music".[53]


when i said that 4chan hadn't affected anything but shitty furry websites, i was making a joke. the joke is that 4chan doesn't do anything but f*ck with other websites in lame ways. they do not affect anything in the real world. this list does nothing to sway my opinion about that.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:39 pm
by john9blue
Entertainment.

Also, rule 1.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:43 pm
by Falkomagno
and what "/b/" stands for??

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:46 pm
by alex951
Falkomagno wrote:and what "/b/" stands for??


Don't look for it I told you its dangerous

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:48 pm
by Army of GOD
/b/ stands for "random" somehow.

All of the porn, racism, homophobia, etc. is really bad and shitty but I must admit, when they make threads that AREN'T about that stuff, it can be pretty funny.

I mean, I still laugh at this: Image



I'd say only go there if you're willing to venture through a myriad of offensive things to find a few funny things.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:19 pm
by hecter
Falkomagno wrote:and what "/b/" stands for??

You know how we have "General Discussion" and "Suggestions and Bug Reports" and "Monkey Business"? They have "/a/" and "/b/" and "/gif/" etc. "/b/" is the nasty one, where you're likely to find people having sex with a woman who has no upperbody (as in it's just the legs up to a bit above the waste, the rest has been hacked off) or autopsies of babies or child porn or some other kind of mix of nasty bullshit. It's also where you find most of the funny shit.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:24 pm
by demonfork
I had never heard of 4chan until I read this thread...anyway I went there...not sure what the big deal is...maybe I'm missing something.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:42 pm
by alster
Never heard of it. Seen chan4chan.com though, dunno if it's the same or a rip-off. In any event, not impressed. Seen worse. As for young minds, well, if having access to the Internet, they have all the porn and violence in the world by their fingertips. This site won't destroy them. However, IMO the establishment always knows what's best for you and I hope they shut it down... :D

Re: 4chan

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:43 pm
by Neoteny
It was interesting for a little while, and then got old quickly after that.
After that it's pretty much only interesting if you are looking for some sketchy porn.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:43 am
by Kalano Sanchin
Rule 34 Conquer Club

Re: 4chan

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:12 am
by Woodruff
SultanOfSurreal wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".


when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything


You mean seriously endangering lives doesn't count as affecting anything in your world? Because 4chan has done so with their prank calling many times.

Re: 4chan

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:25 am
by SultanOfSurreal
Woodruff wrote:
SultanOfSurreal wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why


The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".


when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything


You mean seriously endangering lives doesn't count as affecting anything in your world? Because 4chan has done so with their prank calling many times.


one time a prank call mugged me in an alley at gunpoint

other than that though i've never had my life endangered by a phone call

Re: 4chan

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:35 am
by StephenB
I'm surprised so many people from here know of 4chan. The community there couldn't be more different to that of CC.

Like AoG said, next to the sick stuff there's a lot of hilarious shit there aswell. If you are easily offended, I advise you not to go there out of curiosity. Just trust me when I say you will not like what you find.