Page 38 of 275
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:38 pm
by sam_levi_11
its atletico madrid's nickname
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:43 pm
by oggiss
sam_levi_11 wrote:its atletico madrid's nickname
Uewwww, go Los Blancos!

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:32 am
by sam_levi_11
lol yeah we are colchoneros or indios(because of the old native indians v whites)
anyway i had to laugh
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:51 am
by brooksieb
REAL MADRID 4 LIFE, ARSENAL ARE MUCH BETTER THOUGH!
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:41 pm
by oggiss
Arsenal sucks. Real Madrid probably lost just because they're going for the league title

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:55 pm
by sam_levi_11
real madrid are learning that like arsenal, if u play in a certain style, you get found out sometime.
arsenal rule, atletico rule too, real suck, spurs suck more
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:58 pm
by oggiss
sam_levi_11 wrote:real madrid are learning that like arsenal, if u play in a certain style, you get found out sometime.
arsenal rule, atletico rule too, real suck, spurs suck more
Haha, I don't see Real Madrid playstyle very obvious tbh.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:45 pm
by sam_levi_11
its not as obvious as arsenals but they have a way to really get at them
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:02 pm
by DAZMCFC
CIS Insuranc Cup Final: Dundee United 2
Rangers 2 (after extra-time)
Rangers won on penalties.
Man City 2 Tottenham Hotspurs 1 about time we scored and won.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:06 pm
by DAZMCFC
Scottish FA Cup: Celtic 0 Aberdeen 1
Rangers v Partick Thistle tonight.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:22 pm
by pmchugh
DAZMCFC wrote:Scottish FA Cup: Celtic 0 Aberdeen 1
Rangers v Partick Thistle tonight.
ah i noticed you hadnt posted the partick thistle score
if it wasnt for that jammy goal you would have been beaten by partick at home
1-1 for those that dont know, i hope they beat you at fir hill

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:06 pm
by brooksieb
Well Arsenal are going so downhill it's unbelievable.... fucking 5-8 points ahead!, we had the league in the bag the way we were going now look......THIRD!!!! in the space of a few weeks, this season ain't going as according to plan, lets hope we can beat liverpool i the CL and at the moment i'm happy if we get second in the league since our chances of winning the league are numbered.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:09 pm
by icedagger
Gahhh fucks sake
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:16 pm
by RedBullNation
Arsenal can't afford to drop another point. Man U vs. Chelsea next week.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:29 pm
by DAZMCFC
sorry Arsenal fans, but it seems like 3rd is the best place you can finish. in the Champs league it is up in the air against Liverpool.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:31 pm
by brooksieb
DAZMCFC wrote:sorry Arsenal fans, but it seems like 3rd is the best place you can finish. in the Champs league it is up in the air against Liverpool.
I hope atleast 2nd
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:15 am
by Iliad
RedBullNation wrote:Arsenal can't afford to drop another point. Man U vs. Chelsea next week.
Yay we overtook arsenal time to catch to man u

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:40 am
by oggiss
Seriously.... What the f*ck is wrong with fucking luckers Valencia. They can suck my fucking c*ck.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:33 am
by DAZMCFC
oggiss wrote:Seriously.... What the f*ck is wrong with fucking luckers Valencia. They can suck my fucking c*ck.
did Real who get beat again oggiss?

Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:09 am
by DAZMCFC
right a couple of International(friendlies) results.
Scotland 1 Croatia 1 not bad considering that Croatia topped Englands group and we had several players missing.
France 1 Ingerland 0

anyone see the Rio interview earlier on?
he was asked about Beckham and his 100th cap and he could not remember the 4 who have reached this milestone. he said "Peter Shilton, Bobby Moore and the others" what an idiot and you've got him as captain. is it not
Sir Bobby Moore and at his own club a director in Sir Bobby Charlton. fair enough if he forgot about Billy Wright(he did mainly play in the 50's), but it was only 4 names.

Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:12 am
by brooksieb
I want becks back as captain atleast with him we didn't lose as bad as this, but considering france is a good team i don't mind england loosing if it was 3-0 then no way.
Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:35 am
by pmchugh
DAZMCFC wrote:right a couple of International(friendlies) results.
Scotland 1 Croatia 1 not bad considering that Croatia topped Englands group and we had several players missing.
France 1 Ingerland 0

anyone see the Rio interview earlier on?
he was asked about Beckham and his 100th cap and he could not remember the 4 who have reached this milestone. he said "Peter Shilton, Bobby Moore and the others" what an idiot and you've got him as captain. is it not
Sir Bobby Moore and at his own club a director in Sir Bobby Charlton. fair enough if he forgot about Billy Wright(he did mainly play in the 50's), but it was only 4 names.

scotland 1-0 france
france 0-1 scotland
scotland 1-1 croatia
3 games 7 points if it were a group
england 2-3 croatia
croatia 2-0 england
france 1-0 england
3 games 0 points if it were a group
says it all really...
Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:29 pm
by RedBullNation
MLS needs your help guys.
First off, I need to tell you the story.
In 2009, a team in Seattle (owned by comedian Drew Carey) will start play. He has allowed fans to vote on a name. The favorite at first was "Seattle Sounders," after the NASL (the league with the New York Cosmos) and now USL (American 2nd division soccer) team with plenty of history in the area. However, the name was not included as an option (Seattle FC, Seattle Alliance, and Seattle Republic were options). All 3 options sound stupid. However, write-ins are allowed. Let's do MLS a favor and save it from one of the 3 cheesy names. If you want, vote for Seattle Sounders.
Go here
http://www.mlsinseattle.com/article_noh ... px?id=1152 and follow directions.
Thanks very much.
Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:50 pm
by johnnyrotten
Seattle FC doesn't sound so bad. What is it with you Americans that means you need to give teams unnecessarily flash names? Saying that, this particular case is exempted as you want the retro-ness of Seattle Sounders.
Did the Sounders have any big names back in the day? You know, like Pele, Beckenbauer, Neeskens etc etc etc.
Re: Football (real)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:57 pm
by johnnyrotten
And I'd just like to point you guys in the direction of
viewtopic.php?f=62&t=47292&st=0&sk=t&sd=a 