^_^_^_^_^_^Non Villana 4 *Game Over* MAFIA WIN!^_^_^_^_^_^

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:51 pm

so he can have his puppy. i don't mind lynching submariners as well as idiots

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:02 pm

I'm still the most suspicious of IGS. He posted elsewhere but never here.
That said, Charles if you don't role claim the next time you post, I'm ok with giving you both a new car and a hit with a hammer. :wink:

charles77 · Post by **charles77** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:05 pm

I am a mason people!!!

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:50 pm

Interesting. If what Charles said is true, who could be his partner? W_T? I think it would make sense to put the newbs as masons, but I'm not too sure.

As Charles is a newb, I don't think he would really know what a mason was.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:29 pm

I also think Charles can't fake that roleclaim. For the partner question, roles are given randomly so I don't see how you can try to dig on this without drawbacks. FOS Skittles once again.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:34 pm

r a recruiting mason?

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:35 pm

and unvote

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:36 pm

ga7 wrote:I also think Charles can't fake that roleclaim. For the partner question, roles are given randomly so I don't see how you can try to dig on this without drawbacks. FOS Skittles once again.

Whaa...?

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:38 pm

Simple. I already FOSed you, which you never bothered explaining. Then you go on digging on who could be Charles' partner. Skimming and searching for a night kill? Looks so to me.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:41 pm

How was that skimming? I was just suggesting, I didn't actually mean that he could be his partner.

I wasn't bothered explaining why you FOSed me, because it was your choice to. If I was really bothered about going back to explain it, I would.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:50 pm

You skim because you choose to disregard completely an accusation. Basically you didn't vote at all (according to SL's list) on 2 days and on day 3 you put a vote with an explanation so detached that it looks like you don't want to wet yourself at all. Then you wonder about WT being Charles' mason partner, but it looks like it's just for the sake of arguing and finding the real one, since you don't unvote. And your defense is that you can't be bothered? :roll:

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:54 pm

Vote Count

WT (3) skittles, WT, Seirra
IGS (1) ga7,
charles77 (7) 0ojakeo0, Russian, Firth, Exile, Sheep, Tonka, LSU,
Tonka (1) MM,

17 Alive, 9 to Lynch, 8 to get a new car, 7 to get a Sick Puppy

Charles gets a sick puppy.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:55 pm

I didn't vote on Day 2 because all the pointing was going towards McSnipe, and I didn't believe he was scum at all. I was also busy when Day 2 was happening so I didn't have that much time to post.

Let me go back to find that stupid accusation.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:01 pm

ga7 wrote:Fiou, ok just read back day 2.
First, concerning the lists. On GT's one mostly based on activity, I disagree with the parts about MM and Skittles. MM didn't bring that much to the table, even though I understand from an unexperienced point of view why he was so focused on GT day 2. Then Skittles. I think you have a bit of bias there GT, probably because he seems to agree with you a lot. For example:
Skittles! wrote:Okay. Skip that part.

I notice how Wild_Tiger has hardly participated in this game, with the "spam on" posts. This is seriously annoying, and he's not inputting anything into the game. He may have a big pro-town role, but to me he's not doing anything very productive for the town, if he is pro-town.

This has led me to vote Wild_Tiger.

That post makes my scumdar ping. Seeming to follow a bandwagon but at the same time justifying his vote should WT get lynched and prove to be a power role. Why so much emphasis on the fact he could be pro town? FOS on that.

As for SL's one, it's good to have vote records, even though it's beyond me that you can trust so many people right now

Gimpy made a good post on day 2, which was the main reason I voted McSnipe. Even though he was a survivor I think it'd be good to look at it again:

gimpyThewonder wrote:vote mcsnipe

here's why: I don't actually think he's scum, but i think there was a string of scum that voted for him. Starting w/ Russian. Russian used what Skittles said about scum calling people scum against mcsnipe. But i sure don't recall mcsnipe saying that. I remember LSU calling mcsnipe scum but not the other way around. Next we have IGS quoteing what Russian said as evidence for his vote. Then Charles jumped on th ebandwagon after not saying anything fora couple days.

SO: i believe 2 if not all 3 of these people are scum, w/ the further possibility that LSU and his attack dog mentality is the godfather.

of course this all goes out the window if Mcsnipe is scum but i think that we will learn quite a bit either way from this lynch

So here's some suspects.
Charles77, since he defended Eddie for some reason, doesn't appear that scummy at the moment (at least for a noob). His submarining ways bug me, I'll see if they change. Either way, he looks more like a backup candidate for a lynch.
LSU, well his witch hunts look a bit suspicious; but not enough evidence for me as he puts noobs on the grill regardless of his alignment.
Russianfire is a more interesting case. He seems active and helping, but probably pushed the hardest for McSnipe's lynch. IGMEOY.
Then IGS. Submarining and hoping on wagon. He's a pretty low-profile player from what I saw, but I get scum vibes from him.

About WT. He seemed distant, putting a joke vote on himself, then participated a bit more. I'm not convinced at this point that it's the best option.

I won't cover everyone else but as for general behavior Firth & Jake seem to hop on wagons a lot without much input.

For now, I'll unvote vote IGS, at the moment the one I'm the most suspicious of.

How did I follow a bandwagon when I was the first or second to vote on W_T, which he then voted himself? I didn't bandwagon at all.

Isn't it obvious that after I voted for him, he started posting more? Even if he stated that he wasn't posting before hand because he was busy, he still got some posts in, which all included spam and no help to the town. If he does turn out to be pro town, then that's a bummer. It wouldn't give the mafia the lead, and it wouldn't seriously injure the town because he doesn't input that much at all.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:04 pm

fircoal i unvoted

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:07 pm

Fir, what about the sick puppy?

In any case, Unvote Vote WT I think you are right about most of your points Skittles, but I still have a doubt as to how you presented the things. One point you are right on is that WT has proven utterly useless to town right now, so let's see how it comes out. I'll definitely have my eyes on you if he's pro-town, lucky one

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:07 pm

ga7 wrote:Fir, what about the sick puppy?

In any case, Unvote Vote WT I think you are right about most of your points Skittles, but I still have a doubt as to how you presented the things. One point you are right on is that WT has proven utterly useless to town right now, so let's see how it comes out. I'll definitely have my eyes on you if he's pro-town, lucky one

I don't have a pic of it. but I sent it in the main.

charles77 · Post by **charles77** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:33 pm

i know what a mason is!!!!!!!!

charles77 · Post by **charles77** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:34 pm

am i allowed to tell who my parter is or should i not say that :?:

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:09 am

charles77 wrote:am i allowed to tell who my parter is or should i not say that

It's more advisable not to say who your partner is.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:18 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Tonka is town and you're trying to play too much into the scene. There is nothing to be gained by pursueing tonka so move on or may more votes move on to you as there is a chance that you are scum.

Oh ho! You know this how exactly?

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:21 am

Minister Masket wrote:
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Tonka is town and you're trying to play too much into the scene. There is nothing to be gained by pursueing tonka so move on or may more votes move on to you as there is a chance that you are scum.

Oh ho! You know this how exactly?

He would either know by.
A) Being mafia himself
B) being cop (back-up)
C) Lie, cause Tonka and LSU are scummates,
OR D) Just guessing.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:21 am

With being the cop, I meant that he's investigated him and it turned out town, unless Tonka is the god-father.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:27 am

Skittles! wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Tonka is town and you're trying to play too much into the scene. There is nothing to be gained by pursueing tonka so move on or may more votes move on to you as there is a chance that you are scum.

Oh ho! You know this how exactly?

He would either know by.
A) Being mafia himself
B) being cop (back-up)
C) Lie, cause Tonka and LSU are scummates,
OR D) Just guessing.

Excuse me! Was I asking you?
I know all the conventional ways of knowing a role, and most point to being scum. I want to know how he knows. Not you random bystander!

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:38 am

i say we lynch charles. he isnt helping and although he is town we can test this role thing. my vote stays.