Conquer Club

Norse wrote:You need to chill the f*ck out mate.

I personally find this funny and entertaining. I mean...it's not as though I am at work/around the family dinner table here....

Maybe a sense of humour is missing

OnlyAmbrose wrote:

Norse wrote:You need to chill the f*ck out mate.

I personally find this funny and entertaining. I mean...it's not as though I am at work/around the family dinner table here....

Maybe a sense of humour is missing

I just don't find the idea of social darwinism very funny is all.

cawck mongler wrote:

Guiscard wrote:
I've made anti-colonial arguments many times on this board in terms of what advantages/disadvantages the colonisers gave, and I don't feel the need to do it again here, but I would like to ask you a question...

Do we have a moral right to impose our rule on a people over whom we have no claim other than superior economic or military power?

Surely all debate on benefit / harm (and you are wrong in your assessment) is entirely pointless given how colonialism in general was and is still entirely wrong and illegal!

If, in the course of a mass murder, the criminal gives away fifty pounds to each family member of those murdered it doesn't make him any less culpable, or the murder any less wrong does it?

Back then there weren't any democracies, so it was one dictator (or monarch rather) over another, nothing wrong with that. I'd also like to know how I'm wrong in what I said about Europe making scientific progress through colonialism? After all, places that were left alone never went through industrialisation, it was only places directly affected by the colonial powers.

What if the people the murderer killed staged a rebellion against him, or rather, the natives ruling elite staged the rebellion in order to increase their own wealth?

Guiscard wrote:
Back when? the Colonial period?

Ok... I challenge you to read some form of real history before I reply any further.

hulmey wrote:We are descedants from monkeys (animals) although some of us (like BK) are worse than animals.

We have evolved (intelligent wise) to be stronger than animals, thus why we rule this godforsaken planet of ours.

Take away our intelligence and we are shark bait!!!

Skittles! wrote:

hulmey wrote:We are descedants from monkeys (animals) although some of us (like BK) are worse than animals.

We have evolved (intelligent wise) to be stronger than animals, thus why we rule this godforsaken planet of ours.

Take away our intelligence and we are shark bait!!!

You mean, take away our technology and then we're shark bait. Technology rules us, we don't rule technology. We've become so dependant of it that without it 99% of us wouldn't be able to make a fire.

Dancing Mustard wrote:In Soviet Russia, Shark Bait rules You!

cawck mongler wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

hulmey wrote:We are descedants from monkeys (animals) although some of us (like BK) are worse than animals.

We have evolved (intelligent wise) to be stronger than animals, thus why we rule this godforsaken planet of ours.

Take away our intelligence and we are shark bait!!!

You mean, take away our technology and then we're shark bait. Technology rules us, we don't rule technology. We've become so dependant of it that without it 99% of us wouldn't be able to make a fire.

Being able to make a fire is technology. And why is being dependant on technology such a bad thing?

Norse wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:In Soviet Russia, Shark Bait rules You!

Mind you though, there's some pretty intelligent shark bate over in russia...


Bloody commies.

Skittles! wrote:

Norse wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:In Soviet Russia, Shark Bait rules You!

Mind you though, there's some pretty intelligent shark bate over in russia...


Bloody commies.

I don't think Russia is a communist state anymore..

Skittles! wrote:

Norse wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:In Soviet Russia, Shark Bait rules You!

Mind you though, there's some pretty intelligent shark bate over in russia...


Bloody commies.

I don't think Russia is a communist state anymore..

Norse wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

Norse wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:In Soviet Russia, Shark Bait rules You!

Mind you though, there's some pretty intelligent shark bate over in russia...


Bloody commies.

I don't think Russia is a communist state anymore..

That's what they want you to think.

Norse wrote:Let's draw a line under this ugly matter now...

In conclusion

Africans loved slavery, shark bait rules the communist states of the world, and asian ladies love big willies.

Skittles! wrote:

Norse wrote: asian ladies love big willies.

They obviously don't like American dicks then.

Norse wrote:Let's draw a line under this ugly matter now...

In conclusion

Africans loved slavery

Skittles! wrote:

cawck mongler wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

hulmey wrote:We are descedants from monkeys (animals) although some of us (like BK) are worse than animals.

We have evolved (intelligent wise) to be stronger than animals, thus why we rule this godforsaken planet of ours.

Take away our intelligence and we are shark bait!!!

You mean, take away our technology and then we're shark bait. Technology rules us, we don't rule technology. We've become so dependant of it that without it 99% of us wouldn't be able to make a fire.

Being able to make a fire is technology. And why is being dependant on technology such a bad thing?

Because, if ever we do run out of fossil fuels, our electrical technological tools would become useless.

And I know making fire is a technology, we've just made it easier with the uses of lighters, matches etc.

d.gishman wrote:

Norse wrote:Let's draw a line under this ugly matter now...

In conclusion

Africans loved slavery

this statement is so stupid i dont know where to begin

cawck mongler wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

cawck mongler wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

hulmey wrote:We are descedants from monkeys (animals) although some of us (like BK) are worse than animals.

We have evolved (intelligent wise) to be stronger than animals, thus why we rule this godforsaken planet of ours.

Take away our intelligence and we are shark bait!!!

You mean, take away our technology and then we're shark bait. Technology rules us, we don't rule technology. We've become so dependant of it that without it 99% of us wouldn't be able to make a fire.

Being able to make a fire is technology. And why is being dependant on technology such a bad thing?

Because, if ever we do run out of fossil fuels, our electrical technological tools would become useless.

And I know making fire is a technology, we've just made it easier with the uses of lighters, matches etc.

So we'd go back to how it was before technology? You're saying that no technology is better then technology, because technology will eventually lead to no technology...

cawck mongler wrote:

d.gishman wrote:

Norse wrote:Let's draw a line under this ugly matter now...

In conclusion

Africans loved slavery

this statement is so stupid i dont know where to begin

If they didn't like it, then why did they willingly participate in it?