Theres one in sign ups right nowdjelebert wrote:there will be other zombie baseball tournaments?
Moderator: Community Team

Theres one in sign ups right nowdjelebert wrote:there will be other zombie baseball tournaments?

Yesdjelebert wrote:there will be other zombie baseball tournaments?


not sure if it's gonna countIcePack wrote:OMG... why in the world would zombie baseball event not actually be zombie baseball lol so confusing...
I know, eh?IcePack wrote:OMG... why in the world would zombie baseball event not actually be zombie baseball lol so confusing...

Why wouldn't it count?Pirlo wrote:not sure if it's gonna countIcePack wrote:OMG... why in the world would zombie baseball event not actually be zombie baseball lol so confusing...
Apparently I need to get better at checking more than just settings for these lolDukasaur wrote:I know, eh?IcePack wrote:OMG... why in the world would zombie baseball event not actually be zombie baseball lol so confusing...

there must be something wrong :Mad777 wrote:Yes those are possible, the max per Tribe has been adjusted to "3", hope this will answer hat concernIcePack wrote:Right, and this year there is even less tribes to fill. And some restrict that multiple from same tribe can't join so are those ones even possible / realisticCatchersMitt14 wrote:There were a few issues with this last year when your tribe was your clan (meaning there were more tribe options). The less popular maps/setting tournaments had trouble filling. I think Josko ended up recruiting for at least one of them to start.IcePack wrote:What I mean is, if you have a 16 player tournament where ONLY one is allowed to sign up from each, and there's only 4 primitive and 4 advanced (idk exact true numbers I'm just giving an example) then you'll never hit the 16 required cuz there isn't 16 groups.Mad777 wrote:I don't foresee any issue with this, all Advanced Tribes are very active and the Primitive Tribes have so much players that at least one should step up and hopefully join...I guess we won't know for sure until that day...IcePack wrote:One of the issues I foresee in reusing the old events is some of those restrict 1 per tribe. Well it used to allow for all the clans etc but now it's just 4 primitive and a handful of advanced, are you going to be able to fill those events?
A bug was found, it should be fixed now, thanks so far for all the post about findings, as you may understand it is difficult to make is perfect especially when the thema change from the year before and little adjustment need to be made.djelebert wrote:there must be something wrong :
https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... nt_id=5916
tribe with more participants has more chance to win, finally? A tribe with 4 players involved who win only 1 round each, will be always better placed than a tribe with only one player who won his 4 rounds.
Player....for his Tribe....as it would be for any team ranking.josko.ri wrote:In Tribal tournament, who gets medals, winning player(s) or winning Tribe(s)?
I am sure some of potential Tribe founders like Clan leaders are not yet aware about the transition into Tribes 2.0. I am sure it would be beneficial to send to Clan Leaders which are not yet in Tribes pm explaining difference between Clans and Tribes and that they can be at the same time in Clan and Tribe and encourage them to found new Tribes.Mad777 wrote:I agree with what you said but that was the only way to do it since only 11 Tribes exist, we were hoping to have more Tribe created by the time this Olympics would start but it did not happened.

I cannot join Tribal tournament because 2 players from my Tribe already joined. why is this limit reduced from 3 to 2 without announcing? Also, if you limited to 2 participants per Tribe, you could also limit to 8 Tribes (first come first serve) so then we would have 16 player tournament with 2 players from each Tribe, and that could then be "real" Tribe event.Mad777 wrote:Yes those are possible, the max per Tribe has been adjusted to "3", hope this will answer hat concernIcePack wrote:Right, and this year there is even less tribes to fill. And some restrict that multiple from same tribe can't join so are those ones even possible / realisticCatchersMitt14 wrote:There were a few issues with this last year when your tribe was your clan (meaning there were more tribe options). The less popular maps/setting tournaments had trouble filling. I think Josko ended up recruiting for at least one of them to start.IcePack wrote:What I mean is, if you have a 16 player tournament where ONLY one is allowed to sign up from each, and there's only 4 primitive and 4 advanced (idk exact true numbers I'm just giving an example) then you'll never hit the 16 required cuz there isn't 16 groups.Mad777 wrote:I don't foresee any issue with this, all Advanced Tribes are very active and the Primitive Tribes have so much players that at least one should step up and hopefully join...I guess we won't know for sure until that day...IcePack wrote:One of the issues I foresee in reusing the old events is some of those restrict 1 per tribe. Well it used to allow for all the clans etc but now it's just 4 primitive and a handful of advanced, are you going to be able to fill those events?


I see your point, and on the other hand if we are letting going sideways you end up with 3-4 players from a same Tribe in 16 players tournament like I witnessed since Friday and up to yesterday...3 players per Tribe is basically 4 Tribe out of 11 that could possibly be within the same tournament, in this case not really fair for the other 7 Tribe who are seeking a spot to play...josko.ri wrote:Because of that wrong information that maximum allowed number of players per Tribe is 3, the current tournament Human Catapulting is waiting for last player for already 8 or more hours. If 3 players would really allowed then I would be the last player 8 hours ago and maybe. The entire new edition of the tournament would be filled. But since that information is wrong, we are missing new edition of the tournanent for already more than 8 hours.
I hear you, but does the page shows 1 game then 2 games then 1 game for the final round? I'm not trying to be an a*hole but many complaint about tournaments because player didn't read...Now as far the elimination process this has been for a while if not from the beginning of the Auto Tournament a painful choice but it has to be a winner and not sure it would be better to propose the time spend for the round, if the tournament speed gives you 3 minutes then no reason to play faster.JPlo64 wrote:Why the hell are there 2 games in the 2nd round of the CC Olympics - Speed Shopping tournamnet?!?!?!
https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... d=17650878
On top of it making so sense, the auto-tournament page only opened 1 of the 2 games.
I missed first 3 turns of the other game not knowing it was active, obviously lost it.
The game I played I started 2nd and won, the game that did not open I started first but of course lost b/c of the misses.
Then I'd like someone to explain the tiebreaker that advanced my opponent. Games ended same round, and my win was actually quicker. I guess he joined the tournament first![]()
What a wonderful way to determine who gets a medal in a game type where most games finish in same round number.
I totally understand it is my fault for not realizing it. It is correctly represented in the details.Mad777 wrote:I hear you, but does the page shows 1 game then 2 games then 1 game for the final round? I'm not trying to be an a*hole but many complaint about tournaments because player didn't read...Now as far the elimination process this has been for a while if not from the beginning of the Auto Tournament a painful choice but it has to be a winner and not sure it would be better to propose the time spend for the round, if the tournament speed gives you 3 minutes then no reason to play faster.JPlo64 wrote:Why the hell are there 2 games in the 2nd round of the CC Olympics - Speed Shopping tournamnet?!?!?!
https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... d=17650878
On top of it making so sense, the auto-tournament page only opened 1 of the 2 games.
I missed first 3 turns of the other game not knowing it was active, obviously lost it.
The game I played I started 2nd and won, the game that did not open I started first but of course lost b/c of the misses.
Then I'd like someone to explain the tiebreaker that advanced my opponent. Games ended same round, and my win was actually quicker. I guess he joined the tournament first![]()
What a wonderful way to determine who gets a medal in a game type where most games finish in same round number.
I've seen people playing five or more speed games at once.dkmaster wrote:two speed games running at the same time is sure to much
That must be a player on speedDukasaur wrote:I've seen people playing five or more speed games at once.dkmaster wrote:two speed games running at the same time is sure to much

