Re: Civilization Mafia - Day 1: The Ancient Era
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:42 am
how to you post a picture or a youtube clip?
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=221534
Unity? Sounds like communism to me. DEFCON 1! DEFCON 1!Samlen wrote:Greetings fellow leaders! I hope that we can unify together to bring civilization to this uncivilized world. (Let's hope the barbs don't overrun us like they do in civ VI ._.)
out of yourmadmitch wrote:how to you post a picture or a youtube clip?
I confirmed as Pokemon, now think about my country.Skoffin wrote:I suppose confirmations can indeed suggest information about any given player. For example, could your confirmation perhaps suggest you are infact Great Britain during the time period of the 1980's -1990's?
dakky21 wrote:out of yourmadmitch wrote:how to you post a picture or a youtube clip?
[YouTube]https://youtu.be/6y4qnQ0tEUE[/YouTube]
just cut out 6y4qnQ0tEUE and put that inside youtube tags.
speaking of confirms and cases around those, benga confirmed "congerm" leading me to think he is Germany... Samlen said "confirmerino" from which it is obvious something about Merino which is a type of wool which originated from Spain but modern Merino is domesticated in Australia. In both ways, both benga and Samlen sound as "civilized" countries.
I confirmed as Pokemon, now think about my country.Skoffin wrote:I suppose confirmations can indeed suggest information about any given player. For example, could your confirmation perhaps suggest you are infact Great Britain during the time period of the 1980's -1990's?

The great people of [Redacted] paving the way of progress, as usual.Minister Masket wrote:Had the first Declaration already courtesy of Skoffin.
You should probably remind yourself of Rules 1 and 14. That said, I will have to update it anyway since I somehow left out Flores' avatar.dakky21 wrote:Give us grace period to change avatars? You should have said it in the first place. Also it would be much more informative if you used all others nicknames instead of avatars.
BTW can I declare peace on Skoffin now?
There is no arguing with this logic. Excellent points. Dakky's brilliant plan must be a double bluff!Skoffin wrote:"HURRRBURBLUR I AM JAPAAAAAAN!" is what I take from your comment. What has Japan done for me lately? Stolen my boyfriend and turned him into a weebo. You are no ally of mine, Sir.
But this is is I believe your suggestion there. You may very well be Great Britain, and you may be afflicted with mad cow. This doesn't sound very beneficial to me and may very well disrupt my own stocks, therefore I must close any and all trade with you. If there's no trade between our borders, I don't need you. AWAY WITH YE!
Minister Masket wrote:You should probably remind yourself of Rules 1 and 14. That said, I will have to update it anyway since I somehow left out Flores' avatar.dakky21 wrote:Give us grace period to change avatars? You should have said it in the first place. Also it would be much more informative if you used all others nicknames instead of avatars.
BTW can I declare peace on Skoffin now?
You can request peace but until she does, you remain at war. Why complain though when you're extra safe from lynching?
EDIT: Aha, I have djfireside in there for some reason. That only leaves HotShot RUINING the symmetry.
I don't think it works like that. Yeah, both Tim and Skoffin declared war and that should be +6 on me, but majority lynch is in place. That means first week we have 16 players and 9 is required for a lynch, so with two wars ongoing it would be 9 (+6 from wars) = 15 votes needed for my lynch, not 22. Only if I (or someone) start a third war I'd be lynch proof with 9 + 9 = 18 which would exceed the number of possible votes. Seems like a cool strategy to avoid sure lynch.HotShot53 wrote:So with 2 wars declared on him, dakky now needs 22 votes to be lynched right now with only 16 votes available... I'd say he's safe from being lynched for a while lol.
I'm going to answer your question with another question: How do you know all the civilisations in the game are civilised and how do you know Gandhi is a serial killer? I don't know anything about that, I know only that there are threats to my nation from other nations. Phrase it like you wish.aage wrote:Also, are you going to answer my question Dakky? All the civilisations in the game are considered civilised. The clue is in the phrasing. We have no idea what criteria MM used to determine who is the scum. For all we know, Gandhi is a serial killer. As you said, think outside the box![]()
(am I doing this right?)
I am not Dakky.Skittles! wrote:So you're a furry, Dakky?
Join the weebs. It's fun.~Skoffin wrote:"HURRRBURBLUR I AM JAPAAAAAAN!" is what I take from your comment. What has Japan done for me lately? Stolen my boyfriend and turned him into a weebo. You are no ally of mine, Sir.
ITT: People who didn't read the rules.dakky21 wrote:I don't think it works like that. Yeah, both Tim and Skoffin declared war and that should be +6 on me, but majority lynch is in place. That means first week we have 16 players and 9 is required for a lynch, so with two wars ongoing it would be 9 (+6 from wars) = 15 votes needed for my lynch, not 22. Only if I (or someone) start a third war I'd be lynch proof with 9 + 9 = 18 which would exceed the number of possible votes. Seems like a cool strategy to avoid sure lynch.HotShot53 wrote:So with 2 wars declared on him, dakky now needs 22 votes to be lynched right now with only 16 votes available... I'd say he's safe from being lynched for a while lol.
I'm going to answer your question with another question: How do you know all the civilisations in the game are civilised and how do you know Gandhi is a serial killer? I don't know anything about that, I know only that there are threats to my nation from other nations. Phrase it like you wish.aage wrote:Also, are you going to answer my question Dakky? All the civilisations in the game are considered civilised. The clue is in the phrasing. We have no idea what criteria MM used to determine who is the scum. For all we know, Gandhi is a serial killer. As you said, think outside the box![]()
(am I doing this right?)
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:
And an unrelated list of people I never vote for D1 anyway:
declare friend madmitch
declare friend skoffin
declare friend strike wolf
declare friend TimWoodbury
declare friend benga
declare friend aage
Vote Tim. Throwing Dakky up to unlynchable just looks odd, and then to do it as somehow an act of aggression?
:/ Vote Dakkydakky21 wrote:I don't think it works like that. Yeah, both Tim and Skoffin declared war and that should be +6 on me, but majority lynch is in place. That means first week we have 16 players and 9 is required for a lynch, so with two wars ongoing it would be 9 (+6 from wars) = 15 votes needed for my lynch, not 22. Only if I (or someone) start a third war I'd be lynch proof with 9 + 9 = 18 which would exceed the number of possible votes. Seems like a cool strategy to avoid sure lynch.HotShot53 wrote:So with 2 wars declared on him, dakky now needs 22 votes to be lynched right now with only 16 votes available... I'd say he's safe from being lynched for a while lol.
I'm going to answer your question with another question: How do you know all the civilisations in the game are civilised and how do you know Gandhi is a serial killer? I don't know anything about that, I know only that there are threats to my nation from other nations. Phrase it like you wish.aage wrote:Also, are you going to answer my question Dakky? All the civilisations in the game are considered civilised. The clue is in the phrasing. We have no idea what criteria MM used to determine who is the scum. For all we know, Gandhi is a serial killer. As you said, think outside the box![]()
(am I doing this right?)
strike wolf wrote::/ Vote Dakkydakky21 wrote:I don't think it works like that. Yeah, both Tim and Skoffin declared war and that should be +6 on me, but majority lynch is in place. That means first week we have 16 players and 9 is required for a lynch, so with two wars ongoing it would be 9 (+6 from wars) = 15 votes needed for my lynch, not 22. Only if I (or someone) start a third war I'd be lynch proof with 9 + 9 = 18 which would exceed the number of possible votes. Seems like a cool strategy to avoid sure lynch.HotShot53 wrote:So with 2 wars declared on him, dakky now needs 22 votes to be lynched right now with only 16 votes available... I'd say he's safe from being lynched for a while lol.
I'm going to answer your question with another question: How do you know all the civilisations in the game are civilised and how do you know Gandhi is a serial killer? I don't know anything about that, I know only that there are threats to my nation from other nations.Phrase it like you wish.aage wrote:Also, are you going to answer my question Dakky? All the civilisations in the game are considered civilised. The clue is in the phrasing. We have no idea what criteria MM used to determine who is the scum. For all we know, Gandhi is a serial killer. As you said, think outside the box![]()
(am I doing this right?)