Conquer Club

Iron Butterfly wrote:

Count Belisle wrote:I UnVOTE NS

VOTE NO LYNCH

No lynch serves no purpose but to help mafia at this point in time especially after we got a 3 day extension

Vote Count Besisle

FOS Vodean as well

well im just sayin that unless people really do get much more active, we dont have much to go on. and that means that it is a likely mis-lynch. which is very bad in such a small game. im for pushing cases, but urge us to err on the side of caution.

I was fastposted by the mod

unvote

But with 6 pages, I think we need to lynch the inactive. vote NoSurvivors

IB, I voted before the extention,

so I UNVOTE

Vote nosurvivors agreed let's make him talk about why he wants no one to survive

vodean
DiM
jonty125
jgordon111
Iron Butterfly
DoomYoshi
thehippo8
Count Belisle - (1) - Iron Butterfly
NoSurvivors - (4) - jonty, DoomYoshi, LSU, vodean L-2
LSU Tiger Josh
jak111
No Lunch - (1) - jak

Not Voting: DiM, NoS, jgordon, thehippo, Count

With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch

UUNVOTE COUNT

and yup i am in favor of hitting the inactives.

let's let them claim first and hit them later if hitting is still required.

i believe we should be getting a claim from NS, right?

Yup, NS is up. And now we wait. Can't afford to put him at L1 in case of accidental lynch, but I would have put him at L2 if given the chance.

Iron Butterfly wrote:

Count Belisle wrote:I UnVOTE NS

VOTE NO LYNCH

No lynch serves no purpose but to help mafia at this point in time especially after we got a 3 day extension

Vote Count Besisle

FOS Vodean as well

Unvote, Vote Iron B

Voting blindly is reckless, even you know that. The deadline was supposed to be about 12 hours ago but since it was extended I think I found my suspect for Day 1.

No lynch serves many purposes, especially in aid to protect townies from being blindly lynched Day 1, for the fact of you saying a no lynch only helps scum when lynching today WIFOM or not we are blind. That's scummy at the least, and scum at the best.

While there aren't many good cases Day 1, after we hear from NoS, I'd personally be interested in seeing where an Iron B claim goes. The post I quoted is reckless and half assed and he knows it.

I am not voting blindly.

The very first lesson I learned in my very first game from Safari was to lynch inactives. I am not talking about submariners. In actives! They offer nothing.

Your so full of yourself sometimes.

Iron Butterfly wrote:I am not voting blindly.

The very first lesson I learned in my very first game from Safari was to lynch inactives. I am not talking about submariners. In actives! They offer nothing.

Your so full of yourself sometimes.

This is an insufficient response. Jak called you on attacking count for stating his mind by saying that he is inactive. Stating your mind is not being inactive. You can't call jak BS on that one! But I doubt that jak's vote is valid either, your action IB deserved a fos (perhaps) but more likely a "please explain". Frankly, IB, your vote is WIFOM in the context of the game and perhaps you may want to make a comment on the NS issue rather that dithering off into some strange unchartered territory. If we had nothing else then that would be fine but even now (hours later) ther is no response from NS and all you are doing is being distracting and taking the pressure off NS! Given the time delay, I am getting close to adding my vote but I will sleep on it in the hope that you will clear this up, IB!

can we get a prod on NoS please?

Iron Butterfly wrote:

Count Belisle wrote:I UnVOTE NS

VOTE NO LYNCH

No lynch serves no purpose but to help mafia at this point in time especially after we got a 3 day extension

Vote Count Besisle

FOS Vodean as well

I asked for an extension. We got the extension of three days.

Count voted for a no lynch. A no lynch serves no useful purpose at this point other then to help mafia, especially with no claims.

Count explained his mistake and I unvoted. It was suggested that we target inactive s and in my mind I was thinking REAL inactives...that is people who are AWOL from the game. They serve no purpose and take up space.

I DID NOT say Count was the inactive. It was two different thoughts Hippo.

i agree with targeting inactives. at least to the point where they have to claim or are proded to say something.

NoS has been prodded and picked it up

I will be gone for a week

Until Thursday to be exact. I can probably check in on Tuesday though, so I can see what NoS flips as.

Sorry guys, I saw not much was happening and now there are 3 extra pages! My apologies for being inactive. :S

do we still want a claim?

Maybe a vote count to see where we are at again?

vodean
DiM
jonty125
jgordon111
Iron Butterfly - (1) - jak
DoomYoshi
thehippo8
Count Belisle
NoSurvivors - (4) - jonty, DoomYoshi, LSU, vodean L-2
LSU Tiger Josh
jak111
No Lunch

Not Voting: DiM, NoS, jgordon, thehippo, Count, IB

With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch

Well, I personally think that NoS' response, after 3 days of inactivity and on L2, is inadequate. I think that a claim is appropriate.

thehippo8 wrote:Well, I personally think that NoS' response, after 3 days of inactivity and on L2, is inadequate. I think that a claim is appropriate.

lets give him one more post to really clear things up. that post was kinda just "hey, sorry, im here".
then we decide.
FOS hippo for rushing towards a claim (i know its kinda your meta, but still)