Re: London [All Cities] Riot 2011
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:52 pm
time to rename it uk riots
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=150960
Why can't they protest peacefully? They need to learn a thing or two from Egypt.drake_259 wrote:time to rename it uk riots
simple because there not protesting, its all about looting and causing chaosbedub1 wrote:Why can't they protest peacefully? They need to learn a thing or two from Egypt.drake_259 wrote:time to rename it uk riots
When I saw it on the news, I wondered if you'd turn upDAZMCFC wrote:about 500 scroats just down the road from my house(probably all white). my wife said the police were there early, but have now left. papershops, off-licenses and supermarkets are being targeted. shit load of people are just out watching it all unfold. cars being set alight and maybe Lidl.
oh by the way this is all happening in sunny Salford.
Oh the irony of it all. Manchester police vans in London, whilst the riots are in Manchester.DAZMCFC wrote:about 500 scroats just down the road from my house(probably all white). my wife said the police were there early, but have now left. papershops, off-licenses and supermarkets are being targeted. shit load of people are just out watching it all unfold. cars being set alight and maybe Lidl.
oh by the way this is all happening in sunny Salford.
Gypsys Kiss wrote:When I saw it on the news, I wondered if you'd turn upDAZMCFC wrote:about 500 scroats just down the road from my house(probably all white). my wife said the police were there early, but have now left. papershops, off-licenses and supermarkets are being targeted. shit load of people are just out watching it all unfold. cars being set alight and maybe Lidl.
oh by the way this is all happening in sunny Salford.
Ever do you meanIcePack wrote:Anything happen in Hendon?


1) Yes. Mark Duggan, father of four, whose death, most likely unnecessary at the hand of the policy sparked this.thegreekdog wrote:Some things are apparent here, based on Pedro's descriptions (and I would hardly call Pedro a conservative, pro-elite, pro-status quo kind of guy):Iliad wrote:I was waiting for you to disregard a complex issue completely and reduce it to a cliche.Phatscotty wrote:Understand that the barbarians are at the gate.
Never mind the socio-economic reasons behind the hatred of the youth, the reason that they feel disenfranchised enough to start looting and rioting given the opportunity. Never mind that the high unemployment, austerity measures, the education sector, the closing down of youth centers that have led to the youth having no investment what so ever in the status quo. Never mind the interesting reflection of the consumerist culture, that spends billions on convincing the population that its objects are invaluable and now it appears is more than successful. Never mind the police's response, the mindset of whom has led to a murder of 29 year old father of four, whose response has been completely unable to stem the youth. Never mind what this could mean for possible cuts for the police or whether their response has been shaped to highlight to the government that they are invaluable.
The riots and looting are reprehensible but to simply shut off your brain, which does seem to be your default status, and to call them barbarians misses a great deal what these riots have revealed.
(1) The original riots started as a response to the police shooting a man.
(2) The riots are now the avenue by which youths have taken advantage, criminally.
So, I ask you the following questions:
(1) Who among the rioters are disenfranchised?
(2) What makes you think that the reason for the riots is disenfranchisement and not, as Pedro suggests, trying to steal stuff?
(3) What makes you think the riots are a response to high unemployment and austerity measures?
I additionally offer the following - If these young men were rioting to change the system, I would have sympathy for them. Instead, they are rioting (can we even call it rioting) because they want free shit. Therefore, although Phatscotty is quick with the one liners that don't make sense, it's ridiculous for you to posit that these riots are anything more than a way for people to steal things. I mean, really... disenfranchisement? Are you suggesting there is some sort of comparison between these people and the people in Egypt or Libya? Knock it off.
Iliad wrote:I was waiting for you to disregard a complex issue completely and reduce it to a cliche.Phatscotty wrote:Understand that the barbarians are at the gate.
Iliad wrote:Never mind the socio-economic reasons behind the hatred of the youth, the reason that they feel disenfranchised enough to start looting and rioting given the opportunity. Never mind that the high unemployment, austerity measures, the education sector, the closing down of youth centers that have led to the youth having no investment what so ever in the status quo. Never mind the interesting reflection of the consumerist culture, that spends billions on convincing the population that its objects are invaluable and now it appears is more than successful. Never mind the police's response, the mindset of whom has led to a murder of 29 year old father of four, whose response has been completely unable to stem the youth. Never mind what this could mean for possible cuts for the police or whether their response has been shaped to highlight to the government that they are invaluable.
The riots and looting are reprehensible but to simply shut off your brain, which does seem to be your default status, and to call them barbarians misses a great deal what these riots have revealed.

To live and die in L.A.saxitoxin wrote:
- - similar to Iraq and Libya, neighborhood militias are springing up to fill the void left by police - http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/ ... 0351.shtml

You would be wrong , they have consistently said that they have no desire to carry guns.neanderpaul14 wrote:I bet all the police in Britain were wishing they carried guns right now, not just special response teams.
Best of luck to all those over there, well except the rioters.
Well I guess things are just gonna have to be allowed to get way out of hand then!comic boy wrote:You would be wrong , they have consistently said that they have no desire to carry guns.neanderpaul14 wrote:I bet all the police in Britain were wishing they carried guns right now, not just special response teams.
Best of luck to all those over there, well except the rioters.
There has been speculation that he dealt drugs but nothing concrete has come out yet. There was no firefight , a weapon was found in his car but had not been fired , the bullet that struck an officer was police issue and a richochet.jbrettlip wrote:Is it true that the guy that was shot at the beginnning of this was a known drug dealer, and was in a firefight with the police when he was shot?
Well I guess the British police prefer a few riots every decade to 100,000 gun deaths a yearPhatscotty wrote:Well I guess things are just gonna have to be allowed to get way out of hand then!comic boy wrote:You would be wrong , they have consistently said that they have no desire to carry guns.neanderpaul14 wrote:I bet all the police in Britain were wishing they carried guns right now, not just special response teams.
Best of luck to all those over there, well except the rioters.