Dallas Cowboys Mafia[Mafia win]

dcowboys055 · Post by **dcowboys055** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:57 pm

Vote Count

No Lynch-4(anarkistsdream, everywhere116, what me worry?, unriggable)
Fircoal-2(unit_2, wisse)
what, me worry?-1(beastly)

Puff · Post by **Puff** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:59 pm

what,me worry? wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I would like to see more activity from the following players:

CBlake
Fircoal
Huguenots
cmckinney
beastly
shultz
what, me worry?

If I do not, my vote will go to one of you for not participating in the discussions, as it obviously means you do not care enough about this game to remain in it...

And I do not mean one little post crying about how you've been busy and can't get on the internet... We are ALL fucking busy... Don't sign up if you can't participate...

I will make my choice on Monday afternoon.

Some of us have to work while others spend their friday nights on the computer. And as much as mandalorian and fircoal seem to be pointing fingers, I dont have enough to vote an innocent member out....at least not yet....

No Lynch

You don't have to vote in red in this game.

I think it is a little suspicsious of fircoal to vote no lynch almost right off the bat but I will not vote for now

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:23 pm

See? After my post, you all threw something up to try and defend yourself... That gives everyone info as to your feelings.

As for you Beastly:

I shouldn't have been included on your dumb list... I have been participating...

you should read the back post...

First off, your defensive outlash to my post, and considering the fact that you are a newb, makes me think you have something to hide...

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Beastly

Don't make fucking assumptions about what I have and have not read... And don't act like a dick when your next post shows you don't even know the rules...

Peace.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:43 pm

Puff wrote:
what,me worry? wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I would like to see more activity from the following players:

CBlake
Fircoal
Huguenots
cmckinney
beastly
shultz
what, me worry?

If I do not, my vote will go to one of you for not participating in the discussions, as it obviously means you do not care enough about this game to remain in it...

And I do not mean one little post crying about how you've been busy and can't get on the internet... We are ALL fucking busy... Don't sign up if you can't participate...

I will make my choice on Monday afternoon.

Some of us have to work while others spend their friday nights on the computer. And as much as mandalorian and fircoal seem to be pointing fingers, I dont have enough to vote an innocent member out....at least not yet....

No Lynch

You don't have to vote in red in this game.

I think it is a little suspicsious of fircoal to vote no lynch almost right off the bat but I will not vote for now

??? That was WMW not me.

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:47 pm

My vote will stay for the moment, but as discussion continues that will change.

what,me worry? · Post by **what,me worry?** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:05 pm

Beastly wrote:VOTE WHAT ME WORRY

Right Back at Ya

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Beastly

For being a d*ck.....

cmckinney · Post by **cmckinney** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:06 pm

sorry u guys, i couldnt get to a computer. please forgive me for actually having a social life anarkist. :wink:

anyway, with 15 players im gonna guess that we have 3-4 players mafia, a serial killer, a vigilante, maybe 2 cops, maybe 2 docs, and possibly a few other roles thrown in here and there. comments?

Huguenots · Post by **Huguenots** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:07 pm

i am participating see

cmckinney · Post by **cmckinney** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:08 pm

oooh oooh look! im participating also!!!!!!!!!!

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:08 pm

I agree with your numbers...

And don't worry, my social life had me gone a good portion ofthe weekend too...

And, as I said, I just wanted to hear from you all... Never said I suspected anything at all.. That is, until Beastly's little comment...

'That just reeks of being pissy in an effort to come off as irritated by the implication...

I never voted for anyone at that point, or even FOS'ed anyone...

cmckinney · Post by **cmckinney** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:14 pm

so, we currently have a 1:3 or 1:4 chance of lynching an anti town.

those are not bad odds.

i think that we just need to find a person who looks suspicious and act on it. Even if we do lynch a towinie, the way people vote helps give info.
voting a no lynch will be the best thing for the mafia.

Huguenots · Post by **Huguenots** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:21 pm

true so ,
beastly has two votes
what me worry has one vote
firecoal has two
no lynch has two votes
i think it takes 8 to lynch

Huguenots · Post by **Huguenots** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:26 pm

Anarkistdream Wrote

I agree with your numbers...

And don't worry, my social life had me gone a good portion ofthe weekend too...

And, as I said, I just wanted to hear from you all... Never said I suspected anything at all.. That is, until Beastly's little comment...

'That just reeks of being pissy in an effort to come off as irritated by the implication...

I never voted for anyone at that point, or even FOS'ed anyone...bolding by huguenots

bolding by huguenots

Anarkistdreams Wrote

Argue this somewhere else??? Like where? This is completely about the game...

FOS: Unriggable

yeah no FOSing right

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:27 pm

I meant in my large post that everyone was freaking out about...

Those were two seperate incidences...

Huguenots · Post by **Huguenots** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:28 pm

okay if you ment it like that

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:53 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:See? After my post, you all threw something up to try and defend yourself... That gives everyone info as to your feelings.

As for you Beastly:

I shouldn't have been included on your dumb list... I have been participating...

you should read the back post...

First off, your defensive outlash to my post, and considering the fact that you are a newb, makes me think you have something to hide...

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Beastly

Don't make fucking assumptions about what I have and have not read... And don't act like a dick when your next post shows you don't even know the rules...

Peace.

UNVOTE NO LYNCH

VOTE ANARKISTDREAM

That is scary how quick you are to vote for him - I noticed nothing wrong when I read his post. You're just trying to make a scene.

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:01 pm

unriggable wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:See? After my post, you all threw something up to try and defend yourself... That gives everyone info as to your feelings.

As for you Beastly:

I shouldn't have been included on your dumb list... I have been participating...

you should read the back post...

First off, your defensive outlash to my post, and considering the fact that you are a newb, makes me think you have something to hide...

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Beastly

i think this was just back lash do you really want to do this or is it revenge

Don't make fucking assumptions about what I have and have not read... And don't act like a dick when your next post shows you don't even know the rules...

Peace.

UNVOTE NO LYNCH

VOTE ANARKISTDREAM

That is scary how quick you are to vote for him - I noticed nothing wrong when I read his post. You're just trying to make a scene.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:03 pm

So what does it mean when you quote somebody but dont comment?

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:03 pm

is that just revenge

{look up at my other post sorry messed it up :oops:

}

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:05 pm

Its actually curiosity so dont take offense alot of people do it I never really know what it means.

Beastly · Post by **Beastly** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:15 pm

unvote what me worry

vote anark

zurich111 · Post by **zurich111** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:21 pm

a little bandwagonny and jumppy with votes aren't we Beastly

Huguenots · Post by **Huguenots** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:24 pm

what your not playing but whoever that was is kinda right

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:00 pm

Huguenots wrote:what your not playing but whoever that was is kinda right

I am just as confused as you are...

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:11 pm

i have not seen shultz yet so i think i will vote shultz