Moderator: Community Team

Army of GOD wrote:I should stop posting...
You could say the same for every other claim so far, but it explains the actions of N2 since Jak freely admits to killing IB and I take responsibility for the collateral damage that was HotShotStorrZerg wrote:Here is the deal with your claim.
No one can vouch your claim.

kgb007 wrote:You could say the same for every other claim so far, but it explains the actions of N2 since Jak freely admits to killing IB and I take responsibility for the collateral damage that was HotShotStorrZerg wrote:Here is the deal with your claim.
No one can vouch your claim.
You may not want to claim bc I want it but now you're at L2. What are you gonna do?

The claimed cop was right yesterday. I am more inclined to believe him than not today. Youu have 3 votes already when 5 are needed to lynch. What is it that you require before you will claim?StorrZerg wrote:ill respond to accusations or questions at this time. I will not be claiming with no talk
I won't carry this on any longer... Not sure how you knew but I just threw that accusation out there to get a reaction.StorrZerg wrote:yeah nice try MP i wasn't your check and you know it


mislynch me to prove me right and seal your fate (unjustly or not). the more you push on me, the more I suspect you of being anything but town. the more important question is why you feel like your claim is more important that others..? You certainly were playing like a VT D1 but you're probably more than that.StorrZerg wrote:hmm options
Jac shot Ib
ib shot hotshot
you make the claim after
Basically you are saying medic made correct saves 2 nights in a row.
There is no way to prove your claim.
You could be mafia GF and know you'd come up town if investigated and it still doesn't clear you from being a vamp at this point. Your play has definitely changed since the end of D2. You proved to be pretty influential at the end of D2, rallying the votes to mislynch Jonty. Perhaps the recruiter recognized your charisma..StorrZerg wrote:As for how I knew.
I'm town, and you claim red on me. Can't be true.
you got mafia lynched yesterday, so you are unlikely fake. Thus, fake check / reaction

kgb007 wrote:mislynch me to prove me right and seal your fate (unjustly or not). the more you push on me, the more I suspect you of being anything but town. the more important question is why you feel like your claim is more important that others..? You certainly were playing like a VT D1 but you're probably more than that.StorrZerg wrote:hmm options
Jac shot Ib
ib shot hotshot
you make the claim after
Basically you are saying medic made correct saves 2 nights in a row.
There is no way to prove your claim.
Ok, lets just have everyone say "mislynch me to prove me right" wow that means nothing. or when in a lylo situation, "o if you lynch me games over" I'm pushing on you, because you are playing scummy. You are not voicing your reads with opinions, you are bandwagoning, and your claim just happens to be "convenient" I'd love for someone to be able to disprove your claim, or even prove it. But the deal is unless we had a person watch where mafia killed that night, and it landed on someone who didn't die. That is the only way to prove your claim. But hey idc about your claim. I care about how you have been playing the game.
Why do i care about my claim? Well if mafia really want to know they can try and kill me. Maybe they have, who knows. See here is the other thing, if people want me to claim to claim, thats never going to happen. I'd die before a possible "well force storr to claim just to claim" If people are pushing on me cause they think im mafia, the end result is most likely a claim. As of right now, that is not the case. Just you "wanting a claim" cause im different.
I'd like you to answer spiesr's question as to what will compel you to claim if the fear of getting your townie self lynched isn't enough...
Easy, an actual accusation as to why i am mafia, and what makes me scum. screw claiming cause "o i want you to claim cause i can't think for myself"
I claimed unsolicited yesterday to add colour to Sausage's reasoning for his targets and eventual vote against spiesr (obivously at that time I didn't know it was a fake claim but I wanted get that information out in case I was turned during the night).
Sure, your claim was nicely "timed" it did add possible legitimacy to Sausage's claim. heck thanks for bringing that up, it makes you look even worse now. The deal is we have an interesting circle of A near lynch on jmac, which i had opportunity to push and end the day on. And then a random claim by mafia to force the lynch off jmac. And then a Cop claim to hammer the scum. Seeing the pattern, if there is a cult, it is very likely there is a connection between you and jmac. But to be honest, Jmac should be above you souly because of Sausage pulling the lynch off and pushing Spiesr.
And why are you assuming we have a doc at all? Might as well get all the claims out there and have our pick of the litter to test this vamp theory. I've seen masons be town/anti town so I'm not ready to clear virus' other half.
There is clearly some sort of protection role. There is no reason to out what it is, what type it is, to all of town at this point. !. if there is a cult, they could then take it over. 2. maybe cult all ready has so then knowing is useless so we should be going off reads. If there is only mafia left, then they know who to kill. It is possible medic has gotten correct saves this game. ok guys my bad " a protective role triggered in some way over the past few nights"
For the record, I can understand why Jak targeted virus, under the radar, not contributing much. Same goes for Nark...
Cool, what are your thoughts on the reads virus had then, any thought as to why he kept his vote the way he did?
You could be mafia GF and know you'd come up town if investigated and it still doesn't clear you from being a vamp at this point. Your play has definitely changed since the end of D2. You proved to be pretty influential at the end of D2, rallying the votes to mislynch Jonty. Perhaps the recruiter recognized your charisma..StorrZerg wrote:As for how I knew.
I'm town, and you claim red on me. Can't be true.
you got mafia lynched yesterday, so you are unlikely fake. Thus, fake check / reaction
Cool, interesting thought. So why then does my change in behavior mean i've been converted? Wouldn't i keep up the passion? I'll tell you what though. I made a push, i was wrong things like that happen in mafia. Deal is, if you think i was converted, then you have to think i wasn't the original "cult leader" If that is the case, who is the cult leader? Who am i linked to?

Gesh someone called your theory wrong/ bad and you vote them? You are not even thinking Jonty is scum. Your words are very clear on this "reason" for a jonty lynch.I thought I was pretty clear with my reason for voting Jonty but in case I wasn't, I voted him because he called my theory on N1 actions a "poor assumption". Dismissing my scenario as a possibility was the final straw. Jonty could have defended himself a little harder to draw more posts from people on the fence and expose where alliances fall but he didn't so he might as well have been a villager.
Lets expand a little shall wekgb007 wrote:vote jmac let's get a claim and then reevaluate
So basically you did nothing to help push jmac along other than "I WANT A CLAIM" I guess this does make it more unlikely that you 2 are "together" Specially since jmac claimed vt, and it ended up being very underwhelming.kgb007 wrote:Gut tells me Jmac's claim is BS but other than the post above, I don't have evidence to support my thinking. MP has already unvoted to disfuse the situation so we don't end the day prematurely.Jmac1026 wrote:Vote Roger Dodger.
Spoiler
I really don't like the way he's been playing. Bandwagoning, poor (no) reasonings for the things he has said or done, and his participation has done nothing to further the conversation or cases in constructive ways.
That being said, I'd support a Anark lynch if the case was made for one. Claiming with only two votes? Come on man! You're acting like amateur hour at the Apollo.
kgb007 wrote:unvote vote sausage Let's test MP and Sausage's claim. If MP is correct, we lynched scum and perhaps clear spiesr for the time being - he could get turned by vamps during the night (if he hasn't already). If the lynch goes wrong, Jak can eliminate MP tonight.
I claimed unsolicited yesterday to add colour to Sausage's reasoning for his targets and eventual vote against spiesr (obivously at that time I didn't know it was a fake claim but I wanted get that information out in case I was turned during the night).
kgb007 wrote:@jak you value the RB role more than cop right? how would you feel about lynching the claimed cop in MP and seeing which way he flips. If he's town, you get Sausage in the night, if he's mafia, you're free to target spiesr or jmac or whoever.
unvote I'm thoroughly confused
I don't really care to debate jak's scumminess, he's very clearly not town, he has his own win conditions so whether or not he believes your 11th hour claim is irrelevant to his scumminess.
I do find it curious that MP brings this information out now only because Sausage told he beginning on Wed that he'd be out of town through the weekend so in theory, MP could be rushing to lynch Sausage without any defense.
This doesn't really clear anything up but I might as well get it out there. I am town match maker, during N1 I had to choose two players to be joined. If one died, so did the other. I wasn't prepared to use my action but Mod pointed out that I must, so in a rush I chose IB and Hotshot. Early in D2, I realized my error but at that point it was already done.

Said today. (day 4)kgb007 wrote:unvote vote sausage Let's test MP and Sausage's claim. If MP is correct, we lynched scum and perhaps clear spiesr for the time being - he could get turned by vamps during the night (if he hasn't already). If the lynch goes wrong, Jak can eliminate MP tonight.
Your claim. day 3I claimed unsolicited yesterday to add colour to Sausage's reasoning for his targets and eventual vote against spiesr (obivously at that time I didn't know it was a fake claim but I wanted get that information out in case I was turned during the night).
So, you make it sound as if you claimed before The cop claim. yet you didn't Or that you favored Sausage as the Clean guy. Its a bit confusing to look at and i would like you to clarify. Cause You go onto the lynch, and then "pull out" and then don't vote. The no vote, has been quite convenient for you, "well i would have voted this person" (i can only give jmac credit since he said he would hammer at a certain time) you i cannot give any credit. Your opinion on the matter is mute, you have none in reality. It is as if you are floating around on day 3, not caring what happens. Happy to vote anyone off with out reason and then make "odd claim" Also you tried to push "the claim happened when Sausage was out of town" I think a mafia with Sausage would be more aware of his situation, and that is why you made it a clear point out. "lets scum up MP because of out of game situation"kgb007 wrote:@jak you value the RB role more than cop right? how would you feel about lynching the claimed cop in MP and seeing which way he flips. If he's town, you get Sausage in the night, if he's mafia, you're free to target spiesr or jmac or whoever.
unvote I'm thoroughly confused
I don't really care to debate jak's scumminess, he's very clearly not town, he has his own win conditions so whether or not he believes your 11th hour claim is irrelevant to his scumminess.
I do find it curious that MP brings this information out now only because Sausage told he beginning on Wed that he'd be out of town through the weekend so in theory, MP could be rushing to lynch Sausage without any defense.
This doesn't really clear anything up but I might as well get it out there. I am town match maker, during N1 I had to choose two players to be joined. If one died, so did the other. I wasn't prepared to use my action but Mod pointed out that I must, so in a rush I chose IB and Hotshot. Early in D2, I realized my error but at that point it was already done.
Again, you will notice, he has a habbit of pushing votes with 0 reasoning. I do find it interesting that you bring up the "joke" as "not a reason"kgb007 wrote: vote storr you'll hate my reasoning but let's have a claim, I also didn't care for your joke about not being cleared by jak yesterday

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

We know Sausage to be scum now. He voted Spiesr yesterday - could be a misdirect but I doubt it. Just an opportunity to lynch spiesr given his fake results and that spiesr had been on jonty both D1 and D2. I find it convenient Sausage tries to clear you at the same time by saying he roleblocked you N2 so you couldn't possibly be associated with HotShot's death. I know that you weren't because of my actions but the rest of the town may have gone along with Sausage's thinking.Whatsausage wrote:I am a town roleblocker. Night 1 I blocked spiesr, and night 2 I blocked storr. I wasn’t prepared to claim Day 2 from just one night’s results, but I feel like the changed results point pretty heavily towards spiesr being a killer and storr not. I got the feeling something was up with spiesr on Day 1, but it was just a feeling so I couldn’t really build a case. So I blocked him and then blocked someone else night 2 to see what changed. And judging from the change and his short posts that add little… I am going to go ahead and vote spiesr
FP'd like 3 times haha
Ah...the change in your behavior, at least you acknowledge it. Maybe it means you've been converted or maybe it means that since Jak outed vamps, the recruiter (possibly you) is keeping a lower profile during the day. It's curious that you quickly make a distinction between the possibility of being converted but not being the recruiter. You could be linked to yourself.StorrZerg wrote:Cool, interesting thought. So why then does my change in behavior mean i've been converted? Wouldn't i keep up the passion? I'll tell you what though. I made a push, i was wrong things like that happen in mafia. Deal is, if you think i was converted, then you have to think i wasn't the original "cult leader" If that is the case, who is the cult leader? Who am i linked to?
You quote just about every one of my posts from D3 except the one below which is my very next and subsequently last post from D3:kgb007 wrote:@jak you value the RB role more than cop right? how would you feel about lynching the claimed cop in MP and seeing which way he flips. If he's town, you get Sausage in the night, if he's mafia, you're free to target spiesr or jmac or whoever.
unvote I'm thoroughly confused
Jak hammers less than a day later and since my would-be vote from D3 doesn't matter to you, I won't say who I ultimately would have voted for.kgb007 wrote:There's a chance MP is right and sausage is a mafia RB. No one has counter claimed cop and of the two roles, RB is more likely to be a mafia role. Spiesr is correct, MP, with his claim, has basically turned into a MP vs sausage situation. I think the safer play be would be to lynch the RB so that he absolutely couldn't roleblock jak tonight, in theory, it guarantees jak can eliminate MP at night if we mislynch sausage. The flip side is if the majority is more than 50% confident that MP is scum, we press our luck, lynch MP and hope jak gets another scum/anti town/vamp at night. Still haven't decided who I'm playing my vote for though.
As for my vote against you and the reasoning (or lack of reasoning if you'd like) I'm freely admitting that my vote against jmac and you are to pressure for claims, always have been. Would scum do/admit that? And again you're misunderstanding - you can't say that me bringing up your poorly worded joke from yesterday is "not a reason". It actually IS a reason.StorrZerg wrote:Again, you will notice, he has a habbit of pushing votes with 0 reasoning. I do find it interesting that you bring up the "joke" as "not a reason"kgb007 wrote: vote storr you'll hate my reasoning but let's have a claim, I also didn't care for your joke about not being cleared by jak yesterday