Conquer Club

areyouincahoots wrote:It's the SAT for the south...lol
Not perfect, but it got me a full academic scholarship...

Damn, thats pretty good then, I have to pay to go to school.

what did this start out as anyway? y r we doin this

dragonwarrior7 wrote:what did this start out as anyway? y r we doin this

thanks for helping us
edit: didnt notice it was your first post, couldnt have picked a better thread for it

ak why u have to be so rude to me all the time?.....yea ive been to UCA..

johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread posts awards...
(These are official, checked by yours truly... so don't argue with them)


500th Post - SMITH197

PAGE 34

areyouincahoots wrote:oooooo...i'm the 500th!!!!

500 posts!!! Good job, team!!!!

Johnny didn't give me credit for the 500th post, and I won't have that prize stolen from me...I have proof...lol.

UCAbears wrote:ak why u have to be so rude to me all the time?.....yea ive been to UCA..

i was cracking a joke because you spelled college wrong

cool

you gonna play in the real time UCA?
I would like you to play with us please.

and by the longest thread, you mean what exactly?

That it's a long thread?

I'm confused.

Me too.

what?

edit: the spam is killing me

areyouincahoots wrote:

johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread posts awards...
(These are official, checked by yours truly... so don't argue with them)


500th Post - SMITH197

PAGE 34

areyouincahoots wrote:oooooo...i'm the 500th!!!!

500 posts!!! Good job, team!!!!

Johnny didn't give me credit for the 500th post, and I won't have that prize stolen from me...I have proof...lol.

Sorry hooty, I personally counted them, t'was SMITHY...

areyouincahoots wrote:ummm...not sure, yet...

interests include: communications, history, poli sci, journalism, literature....looking to narrow options in the near future...

I'm "strong" in every area, but I truely excel in english (33 on ACT) and reading (35 on ACT)...

Law, education, and literature and publications are among the possibilities of future careers...

I'm shying away from politics, but it is a possibility...eventually.

lol...You didn't know you were going to get a book when you asked that question, did you? lol...It's a complicated matter for me.

How did you know what I was planning to look into during college? Although my college years are a couple years away...

Bump.

how sad we must bump

jay_a2j wrote:Love how everyone RE-defines words to suit their agenda! There is NO proof that anyone LIED about anything! The inteligence said Saddam had wmd's, Clinton said it, Hillary said it. We just found 500 wmd's. WHAT constitutes a lie? If you people could get past your hatred for Bush long enuff to see ITS NOT THE WAY the left is portraying it! And just as Iran just moved missles to Lebenon so Saddam could have done the same thing! He had 14 months to get rid of wmd's while we waited for the UN to act! WAKE UP!

Ok, the lie was that Saddam had WMD and was capable of shooting at us within 45 minutes. That was what Colin Powell said to congress.

Then we find out that Saddam didn't have immediate access to WMD. Sure, we found 500 units of bioweapons, where were they before Saddam was captured? Where was this imminent, limb-rending threat that we were facing? We knew he had the weapons (after all, we gave him the weapons). The lie wasn't that there were weapons, the lie was that the weapons were battle-ready and could reach us in under an hour. That was the lie, Jay.

Oh, and those little mobile weapons labs that were on the news. The ones with all the neat little arrows showing what was the storage tanks and where certain parts were put together. The mobile labs that turned out to be a hoax. No one remembers those it seems.

Why is it that we aren't allowed to talk about the failings, crimes, and/or lies of this administration (like the vice president committing attempted manslaughter) but you're allowed to harp on about Chappaquiddick and Clinton getting fellated by a white house intern?

jay_a2j wrote:

Pilate wrote:

foutballfreek15 wrote:ReverendKyle wrote: No.

You mean to tell me that we shouldnt of entered Iraq? That means you believe in mass murders! Saddam Hussein was killing off the Iraq's like they weren't worth anything! That just isn't right! Don't even think to say that it isn't our bussiness!

]

So why not say you're going to Iraq to stop Saddam? If you feel so strongly about it, why did they lie about the WMD? Talk about having it both ways

Love how everyone RE-defines words to suit their agenda! There is NO proof that anyone LIED about anything! The inteligence said Saddam had wmd's, Clinton said it, Hillary said it. We just found 500 wmd's. WHAT constitutes a lie? If you people could get past your hatred for Bush long enuff to see ITS NOT THE WAY the left is portraying it! And just as Iran just moved missles to Lebenon so Saddam could have done the same thing! He had 14 months to get rid of wmd's while we waited for the UN to act! WAKE UP!

lol, this is too funny

this forum is too long at it should die

Caleb the Cruel wrote:this forum is too long at it should die

I'm sorry, what?

Sorry Hoots, Johnny's right. Smithy was 500th.

I'm pretty sure we've seen that spam can already on this thread...maybe like page 70 or so...ConfigT broke it out.

areyouincahoots wrote:It's the SAT for the south...lol

Overall score: 31 (out of 36)
Reading:35 (missed one darn question)
English:33
Math:29
Science:27 (all out of 36)

Not perfect, but it got me a full academic scholarship...

Hey if you had gotten one point higher in math you would have gotten the same score my sister, who's now engaged by the way.

strike wolf wrote:Hey if you had gotten one point higher in math you would have gotten the same score my sister, who's now engaged by the way.

Congrats to her, and also I don't care.