Moderator: Cartographers
What does that make TBK and me? Scarecrow and the Cowardly Lion?ender516 wrote:I thought it was the ghost of the Munchkin who hanged himself... wait, that wasn't California, that was Oz ... meh, what's the diff?
You have very valid points here. Amount given for bonus should be based on how borders to protect and how many regions within bonus. However, prominent cities or countries within the region of a map SHOULD be listed. Has anybody ever heard of half of these cities listed on the California map? I haven't and I've lived in California my entire life. Exactly my point.natty_dread wrote:When I made my first map, which is incidentally being revamped currently, some guy from Denmark was horribly offended when Denmark's bonus was (is) only 3 on the map. He said "Denmark is such an important and powerful country that there's no way it's bonus should be so much less than Sweden or Norway!"
I tried to calmly explain, that no matter how much political power a country has in the real world, if it's only a few territories on a map and has only 2 borders, it's bonus has to be low for gameplay purposes.
Gameplay balance needs to be first priority (as we recently bitterly learned on the Korea map) over historical, geographical, economical etc. accuracy. There will always be someone who lives in Poland or whatever and thinks his country should give a +10 autodeploy... however, it's much more important to make sure the map plays well than to worry about things like who's got the biggest cities or most money in the real world.
Yes and fixednatty_dread wrote:Do I see wrong? There seems to be some white in the palm tree...
[/quote]
Yup here they are!thenobodies80 wrote:So it seems we're ready to go. Right?
In that case, TBK could you please post all the files? (just to be sure I don't send to Lack the wrong files).
[/quote]


Well I wasn't really going off of counties when I did this. More just cities and geographical zones. I was aware that Napa isn't doesn't extend as far west as pictured, that was just a fib that some other Cali native said would be fine just to fit Nappa in somewhere.Boss Tokugawa wrote:As a Native Californian I love the map. However I must point out the Napa Valley/County is mislabeled. What you have there is Sonoma county. Napa Valley/county is the east of Sonoma County.
Hope that before this leaves this point someone take a look at. I live in Sonoma valley and The Napa valley does not extend to the ocean or hit Mendocino county. Here is a link to an appropriate map. http://geology.com/state-map/maps/calif ... ty-map.gif
Thanks for all the hard work!

Lol yeah I'll fix it. An honest mistake. Please don't be "offended" by a silly accident. Jeezdemonfork wrote:Why is El Dorado below Sacramento?
I live north of sacramento and south of el dorado....This would be impossible if California was laid out the way that you have it...Can you please fix this, it's very offensive to me that you have el dorado below sacramento
Thanks bubb, I couldn't handle living between sacramento and san franciscoThe Bison King wrote:Lol yeah I'll fix it. An honest mistake. Please don't be "offended" by a silly accident. Jeezdemonfork wrote:Why is El Dorado below Sacramento?
I live north of sacramento and south of el dorado....This would be impossible if California was laid out the way that you have it...Can you please fix this, it's very offensive to me that you have el dorado below sacramento


Because I'm such an inspirational guyLindax wrote:Why is Victor Sullivan's name on the map?
Lx