A strategy point, if anyone still feels inclined to listen to me.
We can be pretty sure it's LOYL. So if we get two town votes on another town, all the scum need to do is both vote him and they've won. (We would have a slight chance, if the doc pulls off another save. It's not worth the risk.) Be as careful putting a second vote on someone as you would a hammer.
I wasn't blocked yeah. but i tracked skoffin and got that he didnt go anywhere, seems to fit with being blocked but it would also fit with being scum who did nothing hmph.
....and ET tracked Scoffin who didn't go anywhere, now let me get this right. If skoffin was scum and her victim was protected, wouldn't she still be tracked to the victims house anyway? I think so.....soooo, either ET is lying or Skoffin is indeed cop. Seeing as he was right about Iliad I am inclined to believe that both ET and Skoffin are both town.
Icedagger hammered cena after the deadline so I am inclined to believe him......that just leaves phil and will.
freemium till clan privs granted
hs 2725 22.12.07 hp 29
yorkiepeter wrote:Hmmm, so we do have a doc by the looks of it.
Now can we clear anybody?
....and ET tracked Scoffin who didn't go anywhere, now let me get this right. If skoffin was scum and her victim was protected, wouldn't she still be tracked to the victims house anyway? I think so.....soooo, either ET is lying or Skoffin is indeed cop. Seeing as he was right about Iliad I am inclined to believe that both ET and Skoffin are both town.
Icedagger hammered cena after the deadline so I am inclined to believe him......that just leaves phil and will.
Huh? Your reasoning doesn't make sense First, if you're assuming Skoffin is town because she was right about Iliad, that also clears Phil (unless godfather?)
I think ET's lying here. Skoffin being blocked makes sense after she claimed cop, ET tracking her and getting no results doesn't. Even if Skoffin was blocked. there should still be results of who she tried to visit right?
Can the mods confirm what a tracker will find out in certain situations, or not?
I'm fairly sure ET is town. Will and skoffin I'm not sure about. Yorkie and Ice voted cena post-claim, but I'm not willing to rule them out just for that. We would probably have got him the next day anyway, especially if skoffin is telling the truth. If Ice hadn't hammered, would he have been able to get through yesterday without making a claim? Also since it was technically past the deadline, he might have thought it wouldn't be counted.
A tracker gives the mod a name each night, and the mod replies with who that preson visited during the night, for example, if i was a killer and a tracker tracked me, and i killed clive, he would obviously get the name Clive back.
Guys I am intentionally lurking. Discuss; Play mafia, it is good.
Oderint Dum Metuant says: Don't confuse the easily confused!
Also: if ET is lying, we can assume one of two things. Either ranger #1 is not in the game, or the scum have been given safe claims. Having #2 without #1 seems unlikely, which means skoffin is also lying. If there are safe claims, either skoffin is lying or cena didn't use his (to make us think there aren't any?).
militant wrote:A tracker gives the mod a name each night, and the mod replies with who that preson visited during the night, for example, if i was a killer and a tracker tracked me, and i killed clive, he would obviously get the name Clive back.
But what happens if the person the tracker tracks is blocked? I.e they try to investigate someone but they're blocked. Would the tracker get who they tried to investigate back?
So if a cop was blocked, he wouldn't have been able to go anywhere and the tracker would get a null result? And if the doctor saved someone, then presumably the mafia would have gone there and failed to get a kill, and the tracker would see that someone was visited? But if the mafia just decided not to kill, there'd be no result.
philh wrote:So if a cop was blocked, he wouldn't have been able to go anywhere and the tracker would get a null result?
Correct.
And if the doctor saved someone, then presumably the mafia would have gone there and failed to get a kill, and the tracker would see that someone was visited? But if the mafia just decided not to kill, there'd be no result.
philh wrote:Also: if ET is lying, we can assume one of two things. Either ranger #1 is not in the game, or the scum have been given safe claims. Having #2 without #1 seems unlikely, which means skoffin is also lying. If there are safe claims, either skoffin is lying or cena didn't use his (to make us think there aren't any?).
Boo!! I brought up safe claims earlier in connection with Cena, and none of you cared Anyway I am certain Ranger #1 is in this game and as no one has countered him I assume ET is that, lynching him would be a mistake. I'd feel threatened except by lynching him you'd just further prove my innocence, however by then it'd likely be moot anyway
For the moment I am suspriscious of will(Yes, still) and Ice. As said he did hammer cena after the deadline, so it could of been a ploy. also, yesterday he was adament in killing either Iliad or myself. To begin with it seemed like he would have prefered the claimed cop o'course.
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Okay, I'm pretty sure skoffin and ET are innocent now. Leaving Will, yorkie and ice.
Will may be the place to start. The other two both voted cena post-claim. Either one of them doing that to deflect suspicion would be plausible, but both is less so.