Conquer Club

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

strike wolf wrote:Well I guess since it doesn't appear anyone has any problems with it...

I am Scruffy Vanilla townie

"Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived" *licks finger and turns page of a porno mag*

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

drake_259 wrote:i killed Talapus N1 and can prove strike is innocent

i am Professor Farnsworth, Town Inventor

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

Gilligan wrote:I am Richard Nixon's Head, Town Vote Stealer.

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

jonty125 wrote:I am Calculon, Vanilla Townie

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

Metsfanmax wrote:Didn't really think this was a good time for a mass claim but since it's already gotten this far, I am Amy Wong, a VT.

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hm I hate massclaims. I'm Zapp Brannigan, town bodyguard. I didn't target anyone N1, protected pcm N2 but didn't die since he just so happened to also target his attacker, and I targeted Haggis N3. I didn't target anyone N4 unfortunately because I was busy with school, so that's why Haggis and drunk died. That's who I would've targeted because I had a pretty good idea they were Leela/Fry.

tbh just from flavor I have a hard time believing Nixon is town. I can't remember how gilligan has played though, I'd have to review.

-Tails

Subject: [Official] Futurama Mafia Day 5 "The Sting"

pancakemix wrote:For the record, I blocked strike last night.

--Pointing out that drake originally posted his role in Red, but then changed it. Not much, but could be something.

--Need a claim from GEQ

--We have 4 Vanilla claims...They should be our first targets. Unfortunately, I still know nothing of the show and need help as to if the role matches the person. I'm sure they do, but you never know.

*3 Vanilla claims

GEQ prodded.

Metsfanmax wrote:Didn't really think this was a good time for a mass claim but since it's already gotten this far, I am Amy Wong, a VT.

Is it possible for two people two get the same role? Because, if so, I am also Amy Wong, Vanilla Townie

That's weird...

Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Gilligan wrote:Pointing out that drake originally posted his role in Red, but then changed it. Not much, but could be something.

I believe i clicked red because i'm too used to clicking it for the votes

and anyway who else would have used the Doomsday Device?

Other items i was given was "Egg" Salad Sandwich and What If Machine

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

I've never seen a double role...

@strike wolf: Yes, I was going to. Was thinking of using it on a Vanilla, I think they have the best odds of being a mafia...What do you think?

drake_259 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Think about this -- what are the chances that I would guess both the exact name, alignment and role of another active player? GEQ's counter claim is terribly weak and should be seen with suspicion given how much scummarining he's done (not that I have been the paragon of activity).

@gilligan: that would be my recommendation as The Professor is a strong claim and Hypnotoad has been flavor confirmed.

@mets:

1. Amy is a fairly common character without being too prevalent. Anyone who did a brief search or had prior knowledge of the series would find her probably just prevalent enough to be believed but small enough it could easily have been not included in the show.

2. Vanilla townie isn't exactly a hard role to come up with particularly in a game that has vanillas confirmed.

3. If QE is lying he'll be lynched tomorrow.

This is a fairly safe lynch.

strike wolf wrote:@mets:

1. Amy is a fairly common character without being too prevalent. Anyone who did a brief search or had prior knowledge of the series would find her probably just prevalent enough to be believed but small enough it could easily have been not included in the show.

Amy appears in like every episode. I disagree that she could easily not have been in the game. If I were manufacturing a role I didn't expect to be in the game already, I would pick a less major character for sure.

3. If QE is lying he'll be lynched tomorrow.

This is a fairly safe lynch.

You could also do it the other way around, following the same logic (assuming there are not, in fact, copied roles in this game).

Metsfanmax wrote:

drake_259 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Think about this -- what are the chances that I would guess both the exact name, alignment and role of another active player? GEQ's counter claim is terribly weak and should be seen with suspicion given how much scummarining he's done (not that I have been the paragon of activity).

I'm just not used to having to keep up with something like this, and to be honest I forgot. Sorry :/
I'm going to vote gilligan
The both of us having the same role is a little fishy, but it sounds like something that safari may throw in. I don't know, it's odd. Seems like it's too easy. I'm baffled that Gil hasn't used his role yet, though. That's why I think his claim is fake.

God Emperor Q wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

drake_259 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Think about this -- what are the chances that I would guess both the exact name, alignment and role of another active player? GEQ's counter claim is terribly weak and should be seen with suspicion given how much scummarining he's done (not that I have been the paragon of activity).

I'm just not used to having to keep up with something like this, and to be honest I forgot. Sorry :/

No worries man. Sometimes people just do forget. I was just surprised that you were given the benefit of the doubt.

God Emperor Q wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

drake_259 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Think about this -- what are the chances that I would guess both the exact name, alignment and role of another active player? GEQ's counter claim is terribly weak and should be seen with suspicion given how much scummarining he's done (not that I have been the paragon of activity).

I'm just not used to having to keep up with something like this, and to be honest I forgot. Sorry :/
I'm going to vote gilligan
The both of us having the same role is a little fishy, but it sounds like something that safari may throw in. I don't know, it's odd. Seems like it's too easy. I'm baffled that Gil hasn't used his role yet, though. That's why I think his claim is fake.

I edited.

We can see what the original post said in Mets' quote, so I think you're ok there.

I'm really not sure which of these two we should lynch, but obviously it ought to be one of them. Let me take some more time to ponder this.

Just a quick reminder NOT to edit your posts. Any more editing of posts and I will be forced to modkill the offender.

God Emperor Q wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

drake_259 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Good enough. There is rarely two of the same exact role. Yes Safari has done it before but I don't think this game was set up that way. vote metsfan

@gilligan: I suggest that you use your ability tonight to prove your role. I was going to suggest lynching you before this latest development.

agree GEQ wouldnt be stupid enough to cc surely

vote mets

Think about this -- what are the chances that I would guess both the exact name, alignment and role of another active player? GEQ's counter claim is terribly weak and should be seen with suspicion given how much scummarining he's done (not that I have been the paragon of activity).

I'm just not used to having to keep up with something like this, and to be honest I forgot. Sorry :/
I'm going to vote gilligan
The both of us having the same role is a little fishy, but it sounds like something that safari may throw in. I don't know, it's odd. Seems like it's too easy. I'm baffled that Gil hasn't used his role yet, though. That's why I think his claim is fake.

It's because I don't know how to use it effectively (I've never seen this role before). I didn't want to out myself too early, because it would have looked bad. I'll use it tonight, and you'll see.

GEQ or Mets

I'll unvote vote GEQ between him and Mets, he been the most scummy.

jonty125 wrote:GEQ or Mets

I'll unvote vote GEQ between him and Mets, he been the most scummy.

Little curious here. There are 2 votes on Mets and 1 on myself (I think I gottem all)

You says it's between Mets and GEQ. There are already votes on Mets, so why not go there? What's your reasoning behind it going for GEQ and not Mets, who already has votes on him?

Gilligan wrote:

jonty125 wrote:GEQ or Mets

I'll unvote vote GEQ between him and Mets, he been the most scummy.

Little curious here. There are 2 votes on Mets and 1 on myself (I think I gottem all)

You says it's between Mets and GEQ. There are already votes on Mets, so why not go there? What's your reasoning behind it going for GEQ and not Mets, who already has votes on him?

Because saf just picked mets without explaining and drake didn't think GEQ wouldn't be stupid enough to counterclaim. I picked GEQ because like I said I've seen him as the most scummy there's no deadline so there is no rush in getting a lynch.

Right now I'm leaning towards GEQ. He's been on my scumdar for a while.... but I'll have to go back. Mets hasn't done anything to raise suspicion, at least in my eyes.

-Tails

QOTD:

Professor Farnsworth: Anyhoo, your net-suits will allow you to experience Fry's worm infested bowels as if you were actually wriggling through them.
Dr. Zoidberg: There's no part of that sentence I didn't like!

Vote Count

GEQ(1)- jonty
Mets(2)- strike, drake
Gilligan(1)- GEQ

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

jonty125 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

jonty125 wrote:GEQ or Mets

I'll unvote vote GEQ between him and Mets, he been the most scummy.

Little curious here. There are 2 votes on Mets and 1 on myself (I think I gottem all)

You says it's between Mets and GEQ. There are already votes on Mets, so why not go there? What's your reasoning behind it going for GEQ and not Mets, who already has votes on him?

Because saf just picked mets without explaining and drake didn't think GEQ wouldn't be stupid enough to counterclaim. I picked GEQ because like I said I've seen him as the most scummy there's no deadline so there is no rush in getting a lynch.

You mean strike, right?

Gilligan wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

jonty125 wrote:GEQ or Mets

I'll unvote vote GEQ between him and Mets, he been the most scummy.

Little curious here. There are 2 votes on Mets and 1 on myself (I think I gottem all)

You says it's between Mets and GEQ. There are already votes on Mets, so why not go there? What's your reasoning behind it going for GEQ and not Mets, who already has votes on him?

Because saf just picked mets without explaining and drake didn't think GEQ wouldn't be stupid enough to counterclaim. I picked GEQ because like I said I've seen him as the most scummy there's no deadline so there is no rush in getting a lynch.

You mean strike, right?

Yeah, saf's post was above

I want to get things rolling.

vote Metsfanmax