Conquer Club

betiko wrote:Voting no lynch was the best way to defend mtam. But this isn t my major point. It s related to the city you re in.

Is it true that you are in king s landing?

I voted no lynch early before people started voting mtam so that makes your first point moot.
Yes I am in King's Landing.

pretender77 wrote: SKIMMER

how am i a skimmer?

jak111 wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Mmm, yeah I'm going to ##Vote Pretender. I could point to any number of reasons over the past two reasons as a good one, but they just keep comin'. This new Zivel business is more than enough on its own...

Sounds like a mix-up to me more than anything.

(Also we have a tropical storm here, nothing major, just something that keeps flickering the damn power so I might not be very active until tonight when I know the power will be on for longer than 10 mins).

Pretender, I suggest you go back to the start of day 2 and reread...

That's a hell of a lot of mixups. If you'll recall, his initial vote on Zivel was rather sloppy as well (more of a convenience vote than anything).

At the speed that the game is moving, the number and size of the posts to read, and especially the very short lengths of days I will never be able to catch up unless I just skip stuff. I even gave up on taking notes. I will just read the pages from today and go with the flow I guess.

As you probably already know I am replacing jmac. I have not seen him post much in my attempt to catch up so I guess that's why I am replacing him. As for presentation, well I played 2 games of mafia before and I modded a couples in our clan's forum.

Dammit, jonty has been killed. He was the one I was agreeing the most in what I have read before. I seen in one of his post being suspicious of ninjabunnies and jak, please anyone confirm that he didn't changed his mind on this. From my day 1 read I found that jak and ninjabunnies were the most supicious, I would like to hear more on them from your perspectives too.

Day 3 Voting ends 7/6 16:00 cc time
About 25 hours from this post

betiko (0): Zivel
charm (3): kgb007, Zivel, Jak111
pretender77 (1): pancakemix

No Lynch (0):

Currently charm is set to be lynched.

People who have yet to cast vote. (15)
SeriousCowKing, 27ninjabunnies , betiko, boonetown, pershy, pretender77, legionnare, jwiedlin, Epitaph1, Army of God, charm, Strike Wolf, Crasp, Nebuchadnezer, MudPuppy

It's a busy weekend. Hard to keep up...

Pretender is suspicious...charm is suspicious...I'll come back tomorrow, when I'm not on my phone, and can properly analyze everything. however, this stupid short day is going to not give us a lot of options.

Can we get an extension?

Can we get 1 day extension due to the 4th of july? It seems like too many people are absent/not active enough.

Perchy, I am glad to know you are indeed from king s landing as it adds up. As the brits would say, I have strong reasons to believe you are "the only scum in the village" after an information that filtrated in our town. We have basically been told that there is only one anti town in king s landing and that it is most likely perchy. While I can t be sure the information is correct since we cannot verify the source, it seems like a pretty legit lead. I would like to get your claim to have a better opinion of what we were told by a secret informant.

My symbolic vote goes on perchy.

Fp

From what I understand, charm said she has been rolebocked in night 1 and not in night 2, while we had only 1 kill in night 1 and 2 kills in night 2. Not sure what her role is, but she has killing powers and I don't think she is a vigilante, vote Charm.

Zivel wrote:Actually, what bloody game are you reading dude? The only person who claimed at the last min was maybe Mtam and he was lynched for being scum.

pretender77 wrote: SKIMMER

You better have some decent answers to what I can only call some messed up play....

Yea. It's a mixup. I apologize. I'm used to 16 or less player mafia games not ones as big as this with people I don't know. I just re-read. I apologize zivel

pretender77 wrote:

Zivel wrote:Actually, what bloody game are you reading dude? The only person who claimed at the last min was maybe Mtam and he was lynched for being scum.

pretender77 wrote: SKIMMER

You better have some decent answers to what I can only call some messed up play....

Yea. It's a mixup. I apologize. I'm used to 16 or less player mafia games not ones as big as this with people I don't know. I just re-read. I apologize zivel

your read on pershy since you know him please.

So I have a little bit of catching up to do. Not much.

And this is a lot to read, Sirius? I'm used to there being 200 pages by the end of Day 1 on TL forums. Quit complaining brah, and actually contribute something.

Though, I wouldn't mind the extension because of fourth of July.

Also, I was roleblocked. Mafia apparently don't like me. That's cool bro.

I must be on to something! *Cough Jweidlin Cough JAK Cough*

Eh, boone. Either super dumbtell on the night kills, or she's actually town here. I was worried there for a minute.

I still say we kill off pershy along with JAK and Jweidlin.

I'm gonna read what I missed, and I'll be back with some more info.

Why is my name all caps? It's actually all lower case letters.. jak. (I wonder if anyone has ever figured out where my username originated from. Probably not yet).

SiriusCowKing wrote:From what I understand, charm said she has been rolebocked in night 1 and not in night 2, while we had only 1 kill in night 1 and 2 kills in night 2. Not sure what her role is, but she has killing powers and I don't think she is a vigilante, vote Charm.

Sirius actually brings up a good point here, 1 died Night 1 and Charm claims to have been blocked Night 1, 2 die Night 2 and she does not claim to be blocked Night 2.

My vote stays, that's a puzzle piece now in play and very suspicious indeed, I am surprised I didn't find it with how insane I am about things like that.

@JAK- cause it looks cooler capitalized. And I'm using your name as an acronym right now.

Also, the reason why charm wasn't roleblocked is because I was roleblocked. Unless there are multiple roleblockers in this game.

So if charm actually has a role that does something, she needs to claim it if it helps town before these idiots jump on her case.

I don't see how sirius automatically assumes charm is the one with killing powers.

Oh good. I can use the extension. Just popping on to say sorry I haven't posted lately and I'll catch up in the AM.

betiko wrote: Perchy, I am glad to know you are indeed from king s landing as it adds up. As the brits would say, I have strong reasons to believe you are "the only scum in the village" after an information that filtrated in our town. We have basically been told that there is only one anti town in king s landing and that it is most likely perchy. While I can t be sure the information is correct since we cannot verify the source, it seems like a pretty legit lead.

ok thanks for sharing - I had kinda figured there would probably be at least 1 scum in King's Landing - that's why I haven't been very forthcoming there in my chat. But why do you suspect me?
Anyway - I'm not sure who I suspect most in KL, there are a couple that are on my "town" list, but difficult to tell who could be scum, although ninja would probably get my vote.
Glad we've got the extension, gives a bit more time to make an informed decision.

pershy wrote:

betiko wrote: Perchy, I am glad to know you are indeed from king s landing as it adds up. As the brits would say, I have strong reasons to believe you are "the only scum in the village" after an information that filtrated in our town. We have basically been told that there is only one anti town in king s landing and that it is most likely perchy. While I can t be sure the information is correct since we cannot verify the source, it seems like a pretty legit lead.

ok thanks for sharing - I had kinda figured there would probably be at least 1 scum in King's Landing - that's why I haven't been very forthcoming there in my chat. But why do you suspect me?
Anyway - I'm not sure who I suspect most in KL, there are a couple that are on my "town" list, but difficult to tell who could be scum, although ninja would probably get my vote.
Glad we've got the extension, gives a bit more time to make an informed decision.

I can't tell you who, but someone got information from the outside talking to player X who visits cities and gets to know how many antitown are in there (he visited king's landing night 2), player Y tracked the same player X night 2 and the result was that he visited you pershy. There was a result of 1 antitown in king's landing. Now out of the 4 players alive in king's landing, why did the result come up as player X visiting pershy? You confirmed that player X indeed visited king's landing by admitting you were part of that town and I think it's our best lead today.

betiko wrote:

pershy wrote:

betiko wrote: Perchy, I am glad to know you are indeed from king s landing as it adds up. As the brits would say, I have strong reasons to believe you are "the only scum in the village" after an information that filtrated in our town. We have basically been told that there is only one anti town in king s landing and that it is most likely perchy. While I can t be sure the information is correct since we cannot verify the source, it seems like a pretty legit lead.

ok thanks for sharing - I had kinda figured there would probably be at least 1 scum in King's Landing - that's why I haven't been very forthcoming there in my chat. But why do you suspect me?
Anyway - I'm not sure who I suspect most in KL, there are a couple that are on my "town" list, but difficult to tell who could be scum, although ninja would probably get my vote.
Glad we've got the extension, gives a bit more time to make an informed decision.

I can't tell you who, but someone got information from the outside talking to player X who visits cities and gets to know how many antitown are in there (he visited king's landing night 2), player Y tracked the same player X night 2 and the result was that he visited you pershy. There was a result of 1 antitown in king's landing. Now out of the 4 players alive in king's landing, why did the result come up as player X visiting pershy? You confirmed that player X indeed visited king's landing by admitting you were part of that town and I think it's our best lead today.

Hmmm, that is very interesting. If you are telling the truth I would be inclined to follow that lead instead. Can anyone confirm what betiko wrote?

The lead on charm could be wrong for many reasons, like if there is a vigilante and he just didn't' kill on night 1, hell it could be charm that is the vigilante. I still think that the lead on charm is a solid one, so I will be willing to vote either pershy or charm.

SiriusCowKing wrote:

betiko wrote:

pershy wrote:

betiko wrote: Perchy, I am glad to know you are indeed from king s landing as it adds up. As the brits would say, I have strong reasons to believe you are "the only scum in the village" after an information that filtrated in our town. We have basically been told that there is only one anti town in king s landing and that it is most likely perchy. While I can t be sure the information is correct since we cannot verify the source, it seems like a pretty legit lead.

ok thanks for sharing - I had kinda figured there would probably be at least 1 scum in King's Landing - that's why I haven't been very forthcoming there in my chat. But why do you suspect me?
Anyway - I'm not sure who I suspect most in KL, there are a couple that are on my "town" list, but difficult to tell who could be scum, although ninja would probably get my vote.
Glad we've got the extension, gives a bit more time to make an informed decision.

I can't tell you who, but someone got information from the outside talking to player X who visits cities and gets to know how many antitown are in there (he visited king's landing night 2), player Y tracked the same player X night 2 and the result was that he visited you pershy. There was a result of 1 antitown in king's landing. Now out of the 4 players alive in king's landing, why did the result come up as player X visiting pershy? You confirmed that player X indeed visited king's landing by admitting you were part of that town and I think it's our best lead today.

Hmmm, that is very interesting. If you are telling the truth I would be inclined to follow that lead instead. Can anyone confirm what betiko wrote?

The lead on charm could be wrong for many reasons, like if there is a vigilante and he just didn't' kill on night 1, hell it could be charm that is the vigilante. I still think that the lead on charm is a solid one, so I will be willing to vote either pershy or charm.

I m not too sure about the charm lead because from flavour it seems like one killer got the 2, it seems like both death are linked. I think her power is to talk in a special QT and that she just laughed for being roleblocked night 1 which didn t prevent her from talking in her Special QT. That s my read on what happened. So i guess storr sends a message to inform when you get roleblocked even if you have no blockable night action?

Regarding pershy, only crasp can openly confirm this as the rest of the dread fort will stay anonymous.

I am here and caught up. Given Betikos reveal, I think my best move right now is to admit tha I too reside in Kings Landing. I say this because i there is indeed only one scum there an s/he gets eliminated without town knowing who is in our city than mafia has free range to kill us off with minimal interference. I will not force the reveal of the other two within KL nor will I confirm or deny if the Throne is in our city. I will ##vote pershy as he is one I was leaning more neutral to scum in our city and Betikos post rings true.

Thank you for confirming, this lead is now the strongest one. ##unvote, vote pershy

strike wolf wrote:I am here and caught up. Given Betikos reveal, I think my best move right now is to admit tha I too reside in Kings Landing. I say this because i there is indeed only one scum there an s/he gets eliminated without town knowing who is in our city than mafia has free range to kill us off with minimal interference. I will not force the reveal of the other two within KL nor will I confirm or deny if the Throne is in our city. I will ##vote pershy as he is one I was leaning more neutral to scum in our city and Betikos post rings true.

there is actually 5 known KL residents, not 4

There is only 4. Hotshot and IB died.

As far as why both Jonty and Hotshot died. It was never brought up in QT but it seems like it might bealover recruiter type mechanic.

Still have some catching up to do but the pershy case is very compelling and who I will most likely cast my vote for. Betiko is a big town read given his vote immunity.

betiko wrote:there is actually 5 known KL residents, not 4

Are you saying 1) KL started with 7 since there are two known dead KLers: IB, HotShot; or 2) that out of 6, you know who five of them are (including the dead); or 3) are you miscounting?

fp'd by Strike