Conquer Club

Alright people let's not go off half-cocked and kill someone at random if the majority of us decides to kill someone. I think that the majority of us should agree before a kill of someone. Anyone agree?

Vote: colton

He's been saying a lot...

Maybe a bit too much. Somewhat suspicious.






Oh, and if you think I've been "submarining": this is my second game and I understand the basic gameplay, but each game is just a tad different so I'm trying to absorb it all.

I am in favor of people with guns using them.

Rainbow Eater wrote:I am in favor of people with guns using them.

Lol, I found that post funny for some reason.

But anyways. I don't know who I should vote, Colton is starting to look suspicious or a bit n00bish. Its hard to differentiate the two :/

Army of GOD wrote:Vote: colton

He's been saying a lot...

Maybe a bit too much. Somewhat suspicious.






Oh, and if you think I've been "submarining": this is my second game and I understand the basic gameplay, but each game is just a tad different so I'm trying to absorb it all.

That is a OMGUS revenge vote. unvote

That is a bit of a omgus vote...
also, night might not be bad, we already had a kill today, if we don't have any suspicions, maybe we should just wait it out.

captainwalrus wrote:That is a bit of a omgus vote...
also, night might not be bad, we already had a kill today, if we don't have any suspicions, maybe we should just wait it out.

Not too bad of an idea especially if there is another cop or something that ain't naive. Like I said earlier we don't need to go off half-cocked today and kill people like yesterday. If that happens then we could end up in an LYLO position. For reference on the not going half-cocked see Shoot 'Em Up Mafia.

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Vote: colton

He's been saying a lot...

Maybe a bit too much. Somewhat suspicious.






Oh, and if you think I've been "submarining": this is my second game and I understand the basic gameplay, but each game is just a tad different so I'm trying to absorb it all.

That is a OMGUS revenge vote. unvote

After looking at the "Mafia terms" thread, you're saying that I'm voting for you because I voted for you? Nah.

In my experience with mafia-type games, I've come to learn two things:

*That I'm always eliminated first
*People who talk a lot are more than likely guilty

You just seem a bit jumpy. And if were wrong, then Thomas Malthus would be glad at least.

Army of GOD wrote:

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Vote: colton

He's been saying a lot...

Maybe a bit too much. Somewhat suspicious.






Oh, and if you think I've been "submarining": this is my second game and I understand the basic gameplay, but each game is just a tad different so I'm trying to absorb it all.

That is a OMGUS revenge vote. unvote

After looking at the "Mafia terms" thread, you're saying that I'm voting for you because I voted for you? Nah.

In my experience with mafia-type games, I've come to learn two things:

*That I'm always eliminated first
*People who talk a lot are more than likely guilty

You just seem a bit jumpy. And if were wrong, then Thomas Malthus would be glad at least.

Not true. I've seen vanilla townies post as much as I am. It's called helping eliminate the mafia by posting speculations or evidence. And if you've been in past games with me, I'm jumpy all the time

colton24 wrote:

captainwalrus wrote:That is a bit of a omgus vote...
also, night might not be bad, we already had a kill today, if we don't have any suspicions, maybe we should just wait it out.

Not too bad of an idea especially if there is another cop or something that ain't naive. Like I said earlier we don't need to go off half-cocked today and kill people like yesterday. If that happens then we could end up in an LYLO position. For reference on the not going half-cocked see Shoot 'Em Up Mafia.

lol, I remember shoot-em-up. Town won though...

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Vote: colton

He's been saying a lot...

Maybe a bit too much. Somewhat suspicious.






Oh, and if you think I've been "submarining": this is my second game and I understand the basic gameplay, but each game is just a tad different so I'm trying to absorb it all.

That is a OMGUS revenge vote. unvote

After looking at the "Mafia terms" thread, you're saying that I'm voting for you because I voted for you? Nah.

In my experience with mafia-type games, I've come to learn two things:

*That I'm always eliminated first
*People who talk a lot are more than likely guilty

You just seem a bit jumpy. And if were wrong, then Thomas Malthus would be glad at least.

Not true. I've seen vanilla townies post as much as I am. It's called helping eliminate the mafia by posting speculations or evidence. And if you've been in past games with me, I'm jumpy all the time

But for all we know, you're making all of this up to mislead us!


Or maybe I'm mafia scum!


WHAT THE F*** IS GOING ON?!?!?!
















Ok I'm done. And it was a joke, I'm not mafia.

Trust me though you could ask just about anyone that has been in past games with me.

captainwalrus wrote:

colton24 wrote:

captainwalrus wrote:That is a bit of a omgus vote...
also, night might not be bad, we already had a kill today, if we don't have any suspicions, maybe we should just wait it out.

Not too bad of an idea especially if there is another cop or something that ain't naive. Like I said earlier we don't need to go off half-cocked today and kill people like yesterday. If that happens then we could end up in an LYLO position. For reference on the not going half-cocked see Shoot 'Em Up Mafia.

lol, I remember shoot-em-up. Town won though...

Yeah, but the 3 random kills almost made the town lose day 1 that game

For the record AoG it looked like your were Pulling an Animorph(2)

vote AoG


He just seemed to argue for killing Colton a bit too much.

mod if people are not responding to prods can we please get some active replacements?

Rainbow Eater wrote:mod if people are not responding to prods can we please get some active replacements?

Who do you want prodded?

Not buying the colton wagon. Posting a lot is actually quite good for the town, given that the person is making meaningful and relevant posts of course, since people can only judge you by what you say.

FOS AoG for his weakly substantiated vote.

But I'm going to follow up on what I was saying earlier and Vote Duday.

F1fth wrote:Not buying the colton wagon. Posting a lot is actually quite good for the town, given that the person is making meaningful and relevant posts of course, since people can only judge you by what you say.

FOS AoG for his weakly substantiated vote.

But I'm going to follow up on what I was saying earlier and Vote Duday.

XD Just when you think the game is heading in another direction...

I don't have a defence to your vote. I've already posted my defence once or twice. But could we get a vote count please and thank you?

Vote Count

colton(3) -nagerous, spurgistan, AoG
AoG(2)-colton, DCR
duday(1)-F1fth

You have 3 days until the deadline is up. Remember, a daykill prolongs the day another week.

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

I thought colton unvoted

Army of GOD wrote:I thought colton unvoted

I did...

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:I thought colton unvoted

I did...

Sooo...shouldn't I have 1 vote?

Army of GOD wrote:

colton24 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:I thought colton unvoted

I did...

Sooo...shouldn't I have 1 vote?

Yeah

Vote Count

colton(3) -nagerous, spurgistan, AoG
AoG(1)- DCR
duday(1)-F1fth

You have 3 days until the deadline is up. Remember, a daykill prolongs the day another week.

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

duday53 wrote:

F1fth wrote:Not buying the colton wagon. Posting a lot is actually quite good for the town, given that the person is making meaningful and relevant posts of course, since people can only judge you by what you say.

FOS AoG for his weakly substantiated vote.

But I'm going to follow up on what I was saying earlier and Vote Duday.

XD Just when you think the game is heading in another direction...

I don't have a defence to your vote. I've already posted my defence once or twice. But could we get a vote count please and thank you?

Look at my first post:

F1fth wrote:...

Anyway, my suspect for the time being is Duday. He hopped on the SFX bandwagon only when the vote started to swing his way, and then shifted to Nag rather quickly. Looks to me like scum getting on his partner's wagon to avoid suspicion, then when he realized we probably weren't going to lynch him he just found another wagon.

Then your response:

duday53 wrote:...

Anyways, I still can't get over how many people have said they wanted to kill someone and then I say it and everyone jumps at my throat. I guess it is understandable considering my choice of words was weird. I said something about "killing someone to make the game more interesting". Have none of you thought about the reaction of activity there would be after you took a pot shot. I did, and I brought it up. I never said I was going to do it (I think), I only said I wanted to.

I'm voting for you because of you behavior on previous bandwagons, not because you said you wanted to daykill someone to make the game more interesting. I'd still like to to hear your defense for that before I decide to change my mind about the vote.

And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.

(One last thing, the vote correction only needed one succinct post. Making frequent one word/one sentence responses that add absolutely nothing to the game only makes the thread harder to navigate and thus the game harder to play. This applies more than just vote corrections of course, but everything [and specifically, to Colton].)