Conquer Club

Leehar wrote:Has there ever been lists with regards to top 5's by country?

Well, there aren't any as far as can see. What I'm looking to understand is if an attempt has ever been made

Obviously it may not be as useful any more with the new scoreboard letting sorting by country but something like 1st 5 Non-americans to 4500 or similar might be interesting?
It's something different at the least...

I agree, probably not that useful for this thread, that would be way too many to keep track of for every country.

jefjef wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

HighlanderAttack wrote:
You can't give theherkman any credit except for joining 1304 games. He did not play them missed most of the turns. Deadbeat most of them. He gets credit for being a loser and nothing more. AoN and I missed some turns for sure but I know I missed less than 20 and AoN I think has stated he missed less than 25. This guy missed at least 2500 turns and that is a low estimate--when said and done he will miss well over 3000 turns--he deserves what he has got and that is stripping of premium and guested.

should theherkman get an ******* asterik like jefjef suggested for 1304?

how should I handle this?

It should not be acknowledged at all. I would say CC is going to find his actions as Intentional deadbeating at the extreme very least but most likely as Intentional point dumping and issue a website ban which would mean CC did not sanction the games. Nor should your list.

HA and AoN did not get disciplined. They played em by the rules.

ok, I won't count it at all then.

yer i wouldnt

lord voldemort wrote:yer i wouldnt

Top 5 with most active games at one time
1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. Hotdoggie 430
5. Shoop76 330

insert jigger1986 582


count jigger though, right?

Blitzaholic wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:yer i wouldnt

Top 5 with most active games at one time
1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. Hotdoggie 430
5. Shoop76 330

insert jigger1986 582


count jigger though, right?

he said he didnt miss any so i would

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:yer i wouldnt

Top 5 with most active games at one time
1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. Hotdoggie 430
5. Shoop76 330

insert jigger1986 582


count jigger though, right?

he said he didnt miss any so i would

Ha! theherkman fail.

Top 5 with most active games at one time
1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. jigger1986 582
5. Hotdoggie 430

6. Shoop76 330


welcome jigger1986

sorry shoop76

should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzaholic wrote:should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzy wants to join the dark side.

JoshyBoy wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzy wants to join the dark side.

I wouldn't mind being a stat mod for statistics and records, I maintian most of them anyways. I could use some help though if CC thinks it may be a good idea?

Blitzaholic wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzy wants to join the dark side.

I wouldn't mind being a stat mod for statistics and records, I maintian most of them anyways. I could use some help though if CC thinks it may be a good idea?

Scodals: The main problem i would have with this is that your records are not historicly accurate. These are your list and you can keep them how you want them but currently you allow for changing before a bracket is complete with 10 people. I have 2 problems with this,
1) These statistics are not accurate, once the next person enters the bracket it is irrelevant what the person before them achieves when looking for reliable statistics.
1. Blitzaholic 5594 score + 112 medals
2. King Herpes 4021 score + 42 medals
3. Chariot of Fire 4264 score + 49 medals
4. Master Fenrir 4055 score + 55 medals
5. Ljex 4015 score + 62 medals
6. Pimphawks70 4176 score + 61 medals
7. Velvecarrots 4613 score + 43 medals
8.
9.
10.
You did not have 5594+112 medals before KH had 4021+42. This makes for unreliable information that is not an accurate depiction of who achieved what when.
2) You are way quicker to update your own results than anyone else's, which is another reason you shouldn't change things after the next person is entered, other people do not tell you of their new counts and as such you don't update them, while you are still updating yourself.

First 5 Top 5: This thread is well done, though one thread does not deserve an entire forum with mods.

Most Medals/Most Wins: Scoreboard does this so it is essentially unnecessary

i think that playing with theherkman, you can not call walid result,because theherkman miss games-and i beat that jiger get very large number of games in theherkman deadbeat, just mine oppinion.

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzy wants to join the dark side.

I wouldn't mind being a stat mod for statistics and records, I maintian most of them anyways. I could use some help though if CC thinks it may be a good idea?

Scodals: The main problem i would have with this is that your records are not historicly accurate. These are your list and you can keep them how you want them but currently you allow for changing before a bracket is complete with 10 people. I have 2 problems with this,
1) These statistics are not accurate, once the next person enters the bracket it is irrelevant what the person before them achieves when looking for reliable statistics.
1. Blitzaholic 5594 score + 112 medals
2. King Herpes 4021 score + 42 medals
3. Chariot of Fire 4264 score + 49 medals
4. Master Fenrir 4055 score + 55 medals
5. Ljex 4015 score + 62 medals
6. Pimphawks70 4176 score + 61 medals
7. Velvecarrots 4613 score + 43 medals
8.
9.
10.
You did not have 5594+112 medals before KH had 4021+42. This makes for unreliable information that is not an accurate depiction of who achieved what when.
2) You are way quicker to update your own results than anyone else's, which is another reason you shouldn't change things after the next person is entered, other people do not tell you of their new counts and as such you don't update them, while you are still updating yourself.

First 5 Top 5: This thread is well done, though one thread does not deserve an entire forum with mods.

Most Medals/Most Wins: Scoreboard does this so it is essentially unnecessary

yes I did ljex in this sense, ok, if you are referring to 4000 score and 40 medals simultaneously, then yes, I was the 1st player to do this. reached that bracket before kh hit 40 medals, my score then was like 4775 with 99 medals, however, I was the only player to get that, then kh finally got there, we were the only 2 forever and I was the 1st, since there was not players yet, my score kept going higher with the medals, so i adjasted it, iw as still the 1st player, then when you finally came along I stopped updating them and froze them in like you suggested, this is why it does not read blitzaholic 5740 score with 114 medals, it reads 5594 score with 112 medals, because from that point on I took your sugggestion. I had over 4000 score and over 90 medals before kh even got his 30th medal. once kh finally got his 30th medal and more slowly, his score dropped a ton.

Blitzaholic wrote:

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:should this thread be sticky?

should there be a stat forum?

should there be stat mods?

Blitzy wants to join the dark side.

I wouldn't mind being a stat mod for statistics and records, I maintian most of them anyways. I could use some help though if CC thinks it may be a good idea?

Scodals: The main problem i would have with this is that your records are not historicly accurate. These are your list and you can keep them how you want them but currently you allow for changing before a bracket is complete with 10 people. I have 2 problems with this,
1) These statistics are not accurate, once the next person enters the bracket it is irrelevant what the person before them achieves when looking for reliable statistics.
1. Blitzaholic 5594 score + 112 medals
2. King Herpes 4021 score + 42 medals
3. Chariot of Fire 4264 score + 49 medals
4. Master Fenrir 4055 score + 55 medals
5. Ljex 4015 score + 62 medals
6. Pimphawks70 4176 score + 61 medals
7. Velvecarrots 4613 score + 43 medals
8.
9.
10.
You did not have 5594+112 medals before KH had 4021+42. This makes for unreliable information that is not an accurate depiction of who achieved what when.
2) You are way quicker to update your own results than anyone else's, which is another reason you shouldn't change things after the next person is entered, other people do not tell you of their new counts and as such you don't update them, while you are still updating yourself.

First 5 Top 5: This thread is well done, though one thread does not deserve an entire forum with mods.

Most Medals/Most Wins: Scoreboard does this so it is essentially unnecessary

yes I did ljex in this sense, ok, if you are referring to 4000 score and 40 medals simultaneously, then yes, I was the 1st player to do this. reached that bracket before kh hit 40 medals, my score then was like 4775 with 99 medals, however, I was the only player to get that, then kh finally got there, we were the only 2 forever and I was the 1st, since there was not players yet, my score kept going higher with the medals, so i adjasted it, iw as still the 1st player, then when you finally came along I stopped updating them and froze them in like you suggested, this is why it does not read blitzaholic 5740 score with 114 medals, it reads 5594 score with 112 medals, because from that point on I took your sugggestion. I had over 4000 score and over 90 medals before kh even got his 30th medal. once kh finally got his 30th medal and more slowly, his score dropped a ton.

Blitz I understand that you got their first, that is not what i am saying is wrong. I am saying this is historically inaccurate because you did not get the numbers it displays for you before KH got the numbers it displays for him. This is my problem with scodals and as much as you change it in the future...there is no way to fix what has been done in the past.

sdh wrote:hopefully a new team medal

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=129525

any update on this?

ljex


you need 15 points for 5000


well done of late m8, gr8 milestone if you hit it

Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

you sure>?






I can add that gilly, nice one, just please help me with updates if you can, thx.

My question is, how can someone get so many contribution medals?

Blitzaholic wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

you sure>?






I can add that gilly, nice one, just please help me with updates if you can, thx.

My question is, how can someone get so many contribution medals?

tournaments, maps, general contribution medals

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

you sure>?






I can add that gilly, nice one, just please help me with updates if you can, thx.

My question is, how can someone get so many contribution medals?

tournaments, maps, general contribution medals

Why is the contribution medal put with the special contribution medal? They are not the same and should have a different medal. Agreed?

Blitzaholic wrote:

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

Gilligan wrote:Top 5 Contribution Medals
1. Gilligan 44
2. danryan 38
3. amazzony 33
3. WidowMakers 33
3. Optimus Prime 33

I thought that that would be a good category for the medal section (No, not because I am number one....)

you sure>?






I can add that gilly, nice one, just please help me with updates if you can, thx.

My question is, how can someone get so many contribution medals?

tournaments, maps, general contribution medals

Why is the contribution medal put with the special contribution medal? They are not the same and should have a different medal. Agreed?

Because they wanted to be able to give out what was previously the special contribution medal more, so they made it the contribution medal. And yes they are basically the same thing just how many got "special contribution medals" was very few people, after the change you still get a medal for helping the site thought which is why the medal exists they are just not so infrequent

I see that

Leader of most usergroups: nagerous - 7

nagerous wrote:Leader of most usergroups: nagerous - 7

I have 7 as well


The only problem with this nagerous, is 5th place could have over 50 players tied with 4 and 5 usergroups.

Blitzaholic wrote:

nagerous wrote:Leader of most usergroups: nagerous - 7

I have 7 as well


The only problem with this nagerous, is 5th place could have over 50 players tied with 4 and 5 usergroups.

I don't think there are that many leaders. You're only leader of 2 (Super Elite and HoF Panel) + 1 clan