Oasis [Quenched]

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:51 pm

on the desert one its kinda hard to read the letters, and the forest is better for reading it right now, but the desert one is definately better for this map. great job! glad ur back to mapmaking!

and yes i think a palm tree would be good. how about this one?

i think you can get rid of the lettering right? good luck!

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:59 pm

nice sigs

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:51 pm

rocky mountain wrote:on the desert one its kinda hard to read the letters, and the forest is better for reading it right now, but the desert one is definately better for this map. great job! glad ur back to mapmaking!

and yes i think a palm tree would be good. how about this one?

i think you can get rid of the lettering right? good luck!

I figured out the palm tree problem. I'm gonna make a few in Bryce (its a 3d program) and just bring them into photoshop. It'll be easy.

hulmey wrote:nice sigs

Thats a great idea.

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:58 pm

wcaclimbing wrote:
hulmey wrote:nice sigs

Thats a great idea.

what is? "nice sigs" is an idea?

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:12 pm

rocky mountain wrote:
wcaclimbing wrote:
hulmey wrote:nice sigs

Thats a great idea.

what is? "nice sigs" is an idea?

In case you haven't noticed, the graphics on my current sig suck (at least they do in my opinion. they are from a very early stage in creation of the map).
And those new banners are almost the right size to make into a signature. Just a bit of resizing and adding a few extra effects and I could have a new sig.

So yes, "nice sigs" was an idea and yes it was a good one.

:roll:

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:21 pm

i get it now...
so have you done any progress on the actual map, or are you just doing the legend first. of course there's not really much more to do on the map (at least not in my opinion...

) but I was just wondering. and i shall say it again, DESERT LEGEND.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:56 pm

I got a bit of progress done on the actual map, but nothing major right now. I'm getting the key done first.

Heres the next version of the key background, with palm trees!

I did:
added palm trees
added some more shadows
changed the color of the sand a bit
changed the color of some of the text

For some reason the text is kinda blurry in this pic. Just try to ignore the blurryness and focus on the image.
This is the newest version:
[bigimg]http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r315/wcaclimbing/KeyTopExamples2.png[/bigimg]

Better?

Here is the previous version, if you want to compare them.:
[bigimg]http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r315/wcaclimbing/KeyTopExamples.png[/bigimg]

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:11 pm

wcaclimbing wrote:Better?

much.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:43 pm

I think your latest is pretty fitting for the map!

--Andy

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:44 pm

Stunning.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:15 pm

Ok guys. The new desert image will be on the map for the next update.
Now I just have to do everything from that big list I made back on page 32:
[click here] to see the list

If you have any suggestions that aren't on that list, please post them. You can find the most recent full map image on the first post.

brandoncfi · Post by **brandoncfi** » Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:26 pm

Great it really gives a sense that you will be making a journey into the harsh desert should look great on the map

Joodoo · Post by **Joodoo** » Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:32 pm

Very nice map. I would suggest somewhere between 15-40 neutral armies in every Grand Oasis territory.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:24 am

Joodoo wrote:Very nice map. I would suggest somewhere between 15-40 neutral armies in every Grand Oasis territory.

Can you explain why the number would have to be that big?
I'm not convinced...

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:42 am

if it was 40 neutrals there would be a total of 120 neutrals there, and thats more than AoR magic, with a lot less bonuses than it... if its 15, its still 45 total, and i think thats too high considering the bonuses that this game holds. the 24 (i think, with 8 on each?) that we have now is fine. i kinda liked the 10 there was before, but it should definately not be 15-40. whats the current neutral count again climbing?

EDIT:ok i see the poll and its 9+ so i guess its gonna be 10? what would it be if that option wins?

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:48 am

rocky mountain wrote:EDIT:ok i see the poll and its 9+ so i guess its gonna be 10? what would it be if that option wins?

Not sure, cause 6 is pulling a lot of votes also. and 9+ is everything above it, so that could be 9 or it could be 99.
I'll probably get a second poll in a few days that narrows down the choices a bit.

bryguy · Post by **bryguy** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:38 am

wcaclimbing wrote:
rocky mountain wrote:EDIT:ok i see the poll and its 9+ so i guess its gonna be 10? what would it be if that option wins?

Not sure, cause 6 is pulling a lot of votes also. and 9+ is everything above it, so that could be 9 or it could be 99.
I'll probably get a second poll in a few days that narrows down the choices a bit.

ok cool

and also the poll is 9+, so it could be 9, 99, 999, 9999, 99999, 999999, 9999999, 99999999, 999999999, 9999999999, 99999999999, 999999999999, or more! or anywhere in between!

rocky mountain · Post by **rocky mountain** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:30 pm

i think it should be 6 or 10

bryguy · Post by **bryguy** » Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:36 pm

rocky mountain wrote:i think it should be 6 or 10

why not 9.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001? thats a cool number.

But yea as rocky said 6 or 10 it should be. Although if its 10, then people will be discouraged of going for it. If its 6, they have a higher chance of going for it. And if its 1, then it will be a slaughterfest to get to the oasis first

zimmah · Post by **zimmah** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:11 am

Desert 19 doesn't exist, lol [-X

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:07 pm

zimmah wrote:Desert 19 doesn't exist, lol

Nice catch there, I'll fix that.

Doing work on the map today. Update in a few days.

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:05 pm

I'm a big fan of 9 on grand oasis, 27 will be large enough to stave off any too easy wins at least for a few rounds, and by then it'll be a good fight

Siedshow99 · Post by **Siedshow99** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:48 am

Aww I opened this thread thinking it would be a map based on the band

Joodoo · Post by **Joodoo** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:05 am

Okay, sry for the unreasonable post I made previously. I think this would be a very interesting map because it's only one I've seen so far that has no continents or additional territory bonuses, but has auto-deploy. It's kinda like somewhere between Circus Maximus (although I've never played on it before) and the other maps.

zimmah · Post by **zimmah** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:48 am

Joodoo wrote:Okay, sry for the unreasonable post I made previously. I think this would be a very interesting map because it's only one I've seen so far that has no continents or additional territory bonuses, but has auto-deploy. It's kinda like somewhere between Circus Maximus (although I've never played on it before) and the other maps.

autodeploy? where do you see autodeploy?

Oasis [Quenched]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]

Re: Oasis ---- OMG! Small Update June 3rd (on page 1 and 34) [I]