Page 3 of 4

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:51 pm
by obliterationX
sailorseal wrote:
Tupence wrote:
sailorseal wrote:I'm pleased to see that only the Exictium victories have been counted in the title :roll:

So now you can't read, count or take your turns? There is a Water's Fury victory very clearly in the title...hence the [1]. And that victory is the only Water's Fury that has been posted in this thread.

:roll:

LOL. Lying to yourself to make you and your horrible clan seem better than they are? You're pathetic. So are your tactics, but coming from someone who clearly can't read, then fair enough. Your fair play is also horrific. Never have I experienced intentional turn-missing from the leader of a clan in a Clan Challenge, because he was too incompetent to take his turns.

That's tragic.

You know, I would say " :lol: ", but I'm going to say =D> =D> =D> , you really are a funny one. Keep it up, little kid. =D>

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:28 pm
by Jefreus
sailorseal wrote:I'm pleased to see that only the Exictium victories have been counted in the title :roll:


Sailor, perhaps you misunderstand that the singles games are best of 3 - that means whoever wins 2 or more gets the victory, and whether or not the loser has won 1 game or 0 is irrelevant.

And if players would report game results, it would be nice ;)

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
by obliterationX
My apologies to all if my previous post seemed a bit on the "flamey" side, but sometimes little kids like sailorseal need to be told how it is, straight up. :)

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:08 pm
by sailorseal
Just a note to all Exicitium members I will no longer be communicating with any of you except Mad, so fell free to express your opinions just do not expect a response.

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:56 pm
by Kotaro
Mad Pineapples wrote:Doubles

Classic Shapes: Mad Pineapples & Kotaro Vs. Sir Sinclair & sailorseal
Game 5351729


We lost that one. Nice dice team 2.

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:05 pm
by Jefreus
Kotaro wrote:
Mad Pineapples wrote:Doubles

Classic Shapes: Mad Pineapples & Kotaro Vs. Sir Sinclair & sailorseal
Game 5351729


We lost that one. Nice dice team 2.



Thanks Kotaro, updated ;)

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:50 am
by jpcloet
obliterationX wrote:My apologies to all if my previous post seemed a bit on the "flamey" side, but sometimes little kids like sailorseal need to be told how it is, straight up. :)


Just stick to the facts:

  • Games posted almost 2 weeks ago
  • There are 5 or 6 games still open
  • WF has been warned already about possible default.
  • I've expressed my concern about the league impact of WF joining if they are this organized.
  • The pm response I got from SS was disgraceful to his clan, I expect more from a leader, and he was given some tips on how to deal with that situation if true.

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:17 am
by Kotaro
Game 5351595

Won by Exictium

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:48 pm
by Jefreus
Kotaro wrote:Game 5351595

Won by Exictium


Updated, thanks ;)

Re: Exictium [7] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:53 pm
by Jefreus
I've gathered the games that currently still need to be filled by Water's Fury:

Singles
Supermax: Prison Riot!: Kotaro Vs. ?
Game Game 5351583
Game Game 5351584
Game Game 5351585

Doubles
Treasures of Galapagos: Mad Pineapples & jammyjames Vs. Sir Sinclair & ?
Game Game 5351693

Triples
Pelopennesian War: Kotaro, jammyjames & Mad Pineapples Vs. Sir Sinclair & ?
Game Game 5351751

Imperium Romanum: Mad Pineapples, Kotaro & obliterationX Vs. tlane, Sir Sinclair, & ?
Game Game 5351754

Waterloo: obliterationX, Mad Pineapples & Jefreus Vs. ?
Game Game 5351760

Poker Club: MegsEggs, Kotaro & Tupence Vs. tlane, Sir Sinclair, & ?
Game Game 5351602

Quadruples
Waterloo: Mad Pineapples, Kotaro, jammyjames & obliterationX Vs. ?
Game Game 5351770

Pelopennesian War: Jefreus, Mad Pineapples, obliterationX & Kotaro Vs. tlane, sailorseal & SirSinclair ?
Game Game 5351797


I would also like to again congratulate Sir Sinclair on his newborn daughter :)

Re: Exictium [7] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:27 pm
by Kotaro
Jefreus wrote:
I would also like to again congratulate Sir Sinclair on his newborn daughter :)


As would I

Re: Exictium [7] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:29 pm
by Tupence
Kotaro wrote:
Jefreus wrote:
I would also like to again congratulate Sir Sinclair on his newborn daughter :)


As would I

Me too, many congratulations and hope all the family are well. Any missed turns will be forgiven!
By you that is, not by other members of your clan...

Re: Exictium [7] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:18 pm
by Kotaro
Game 5351735

Won by us

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:53 pm
by The Neon Peon
obliterationX wrote:
sailorseal wrote:
Tupence wrote:
sailorseal wrote:I'm pleased to see that only the Exictium victories have been counted in the title :roll:

So now you can't read, count or take your turns? There is a Water's Fury victory very clearly in the title...hence the [1]. And that victory is the only Water's Fury that has been posted in this thread.

:roll:

LOL. Lying to yourself to make you and your horrible clan seem better than they are? You're pathetic. So are your tactics, but coming from someone who clearly can't read, then fair enough. Your fair play is also horrific. Never have I experienced intentional turn-missing from the leader of a clan in a Clan Challenge, because he was too incompetent to take his turns.

That's tragic.

You know, I would say " :lol: ", but I'm going to say =D> =D> =D> , you really are a funny one. Keep it up, little kid. =D>

I think being a cadet is less pathetic than getting to colonel by foeing everyone who shows an ounce of skill. Honestly, KLOBBER does that and he got to general easily by foeing all high ranks, why are you still barely a colonel? I've gotten higher than your best score by playing doodle assassins for heaven's sake.

Re: Exictium [7] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:59 pm
by Kotaro
You know what's truly tragic? A troller spamming useless nonesense in someones clan thread

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:50 pm
by Jefreus
The Neon Peon wrote:
obliterationX wrote:
sailorseal wrote:
Tupence wrote:
sailorseal wrote:I'm pleased to see that only the Exictium victories have been counted in the title :roll:

So now you can't read, count or take your turns? There is a Water's Fury victory very clearly in the title...hence the [1]. And that victory is the only Water's Fury that has been posted in this thread.

:roll:

LOL. Lying to yourself to make you and your horrible clan seem better than they are? You're pathetic. So are your tactics, but coming from someone who clearly can't read, then fair enough. Your fair play is also horrific. Never have I experienced intentional turn-missing from the leader of a clan in a Clan Challenge, because he was too incompetent to take his turns.

That's tragic.

You know, I would say " :lol: ", but I'm going to say =D> =D> =D> , you really are a funny one. Keep it up, little kid. =D>

I think being a cadet is less pathetic than getting to colonel by foeing everyone who shows an ounce of skill. Honestly, KLOBBER does that and he got to general easily by foeing all high ranks, why are you still barely a colonel? I've gotten higher than your best score by playing doodle assassins for heaven's sake.


Awfully rude to come into a clan challenge thread where you're in neither of the two clans and instead decide to pick at one of the players. What goes on between you two does not involve the clans, so I ask you either save this for PMs or wall posts. Keep our thread clean of useless spam.

Kotaro wrote:Game 5351735

Won by us

Updated, thanks.

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:05 pm
by The Neon Peon
Jefreus wrote:Awfully rude to come into a clan challenge thread where you're in neither of the two clans and instead decide to pick at one of the players. What goes on between you two does not involve the clans, so I ask you either save this for PMs or wall posts. Keep our thread clean of useless spam.

I am defending someone who is being flamed, anything wrong with that? I do not like sailor whatsoever, and I am rooting for Exictium in this clan war, but personally, I believe that if someone resorts to foeing every high rank you see to win games, he/she should not be laughing at other people for incompetence in the game.

Maybe that's just me.

Good luck in the rest of your games here, if they ever get started.

Re: Exictium [8] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:40 pm
by Sir Sinclair
I just want to say I am sorry that some of our clan is unorganized and alsoThanks for the congrats and yes everyone is healty :D


SORRY AGAIN

Re: Exictium [8] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:59 pm
by Jefreus
Sir Sinclair wrote:I just want to say I am sorry that some of our clan is unorganized and alsoThanks for the congrats and yes everyone is healty :D


SORRY AGAIN


No worries Sir, you've been doing your part in this war. Just need others to step up.

Btw, nice avatar =D>

Re: Exictium [8] Vs. Water's Fury [2]

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:47 am
by Sir Sinclair
Game 5351757 waters fury wins

Re: Exictium [15] Vs. Water's Fury [3]

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:55 am
by Mad Pineapples
I've now returned. The scores have been updated.

Could everyone please calm down? Keep personal arguments to wall comments and private messages. This thread is no place for them.

Re: Exictium [15] Vs. Water's Fury [3]

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:32 pm
by Jefreus
Mad, you might want to edit out the comment I added at the end of the original post ;)

Re: Exictium [16] Vs. Water's Fury [3]

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:26 am
by Tupence
Game 5351615 - Another win for Exictium

Re: Exictium [6] Vs. Water's Fury [1]

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:45 am
by obliterationX
The Neon Peon wrote:
Jefreus wrote:Awfully rude to come into a clan challenge thread where you're in neither of the two clans and instead decide to pick at one of the players. What goes on between you two does not involve the clans, so I ask you either save this for PMs or wall posts. Keep our thread clean of useless spam.

I am defending someone who is being flamed, anything wrong with that? I do not like sailor whatsoever, and I am rooting for Exictium in this clan war, but personally, I believe that if someone resorts to foeing every high rank you see to win games, he/she should not be laughing at other people for incompetence in the game.

Maybe that's just me.

Good luck in the rest of your games here, if they ever get started.

Why are you here? Go and play a few of those AssDoodles and get back to Colonel, bro!

Re: Exictium [17] Vs. Water's Fury [4]

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:28 pm
by Kotaro
North America: Mad Pineapples & MegsEggs Vs. tlane & Sir Sinclair
Game 5351740


We win

Cairns Coral Coast: Mad Pineapples, Kotaro, obliterationX & jammyjames Vs. 3mp0r3r, Sir Sinclair, tlane & sailorseal
Game 5351790


We win