Conquer Club

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

1,2,3,6,4,5 (Pure guess)

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

shouldn't it be: " in what order he germaned them in" ? , he wasn't finnish.

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

shouldn't it be: " in what order he germaned them in" ? , he wasn't finnish.

my you are witty today MPG

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

4, 3, 5, 1, 2, 6

If I get it right, I am the greatest guesser on earth.

No.

Hoagy wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

1,2,3,6,4,5 (Pure guess)

No.

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Johann Sebastian Bach wrote 6 Brandenburg Concertos. However, he did not finnish them in the order in which they were started. What is the order in which he finished them?

shouldn't it be: " in what order he germaned them in" ? , he wasn't finnish.

Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Captain_Scarlet wrote:1 2 3 4 5 6

No.

well, all I know is I think #2 was the last, and that he was as prolific in procreating as he was at composing, but that's the extent of my knowledge on him ( I much prefer Handel).

Should I just give the answer or should I wait till someone guesses right?

Martin Ronne wrote:Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Lost you're sense of humour marty ? Tsk Tsk. Tetchy, Tetchy

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Lost you're sense of humour marty ? Tsk Tsk. Tetchy, Tetchy

No, I just hate Grammar Nazi's more than any other type of "academic."

Martin Ronne wrote:

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Lost you're sense of humour marty ? Tsk Tsk. Tetchy, Tetchy

No, I just hate Grammar Nazi's more than any other type of "academic."

Shouldn't that be "academic". ? Correct puctuation is important, you know.


(I'm sorry I'm no grammar nazi. Believe me ).

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Lost you're sense of humour marty ? Tsk Tsk. Tetchy, Tetchy

No, I just hate Grammar Nazi's more than any other type of "academic."

Shouldn't that be "academic". ? Correct puctuation is important, you know.


(I'm sorry I'm no grammar nazi. Believe me ).

Could also be a difference between USA and NZ. I mean the brits spell theatre and we spell theater, there's center and centre.





Be sides, (.") looks better.

Martin Ronne wrote:Should I just give the answer or should I wait till someone guesses right?

I know 4 became 6

1 2 3 5 6 4

Martin Ronne wrote:

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Shove it up your ass Grammar Nazi!

Lost you're sense of humour marty ? Tsk Tsk. Tetchy, Tetchy

Could also be a difference between USA and NZ. I mean the brits spell theatre and we spell theater, there's center and centre.

now you "guys" going to play nice

there isn't a difference between USA and NZ - its a difference between modern English and what has become Amercian English
however grammar is grammar

so Marty here is an idea

we can turn our guesses into another game i.e. 2 positions correct type clues

Would two of those correct positions be: "missionary" and "doggy" ?


(I'm sorry - just in an extremely good (and mischievious) mood this morning)

(did I spell "mischievious" right ? ).

Captain_Scarlet wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Should I just give the answer or should I wait till someone guesses right?

I know 4 became 6

1 2 3 5 6 4

no

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:Would two of those correct positions be: "missionary" and "doggy" ?


(I'm sorry - just in an extremely good (and mischievious) mood this morning)

(did I spell "mischievious" right ? ).

Does it matter?

Martin Ronne wrote:

Captain_Scarlet wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Should I just give the answer or should I wait till someone guesses right?

I know 4 became 6

1 2 3 5 6 4

no

yes he used 4 to make 6

Captain_Scarlet wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:

Captain_Scarlet wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:Should I just give the answer or should I wait till someone guesses right?

I know 4 became 6

1 2 3 5 6 4

no

yes he used 4 to make 6

Either way, that's not the order.

6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1?

no again

without googling I'm pretty sure his last finished was 2. At least i remember that from way back.....and I'd bet more on I'm wrong than i'm right, so in saying that...

so i'll guess: 1,3,4,5,6,2.

MrPanzerGeneral wrote:without googling I'm pretty sure his last finished was 2. At least i remember that from way back.....and I'd bet more on I'm wrong than i'm right, so in saying that...

so i'll guess: 1,3,4,5,6,2.

Very close, the first three are right.

1,3,4 (and still just backing something in the back of my mind), 6,5,2