Conquer Club

sully800 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes

No changes, except KH should have a hell of a lot more days than 29....

nope, not that i recall, him and sjnap switched leads several times, he may be over 29 currrently, anyone know when sjnap most recently lost his spot?

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.

done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx

Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!

ok sjnap, I will change it

Blitzaholic wrote:

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.

done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx

Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!

ok sjnap, I will change it

thank u my friend
oh btw...I still luv ya

Blitzaholic wrote:

sully800 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes

No changes, except KH should have a hell of a lot more days than 29....

nope, not that i recall, him and sjnap switched leads several times, he may be over 29 currrently, anyone know when sjnap most recently lost his spot?

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.

done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx

Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!

ok sjnap, I will change it

thank u my friend
oh btw...I still luv ya

Sorry Snapo-- I was referring to when I was Conqueror. At that time, you were all casual free and speed teams.

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

sjnap wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.

done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx

Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!

ok sjnap, I will change it

thank u my friend
oh btw...I still luv ya

you make me blush

karelpietertje wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes

That's not what she said

good one karelpietertje

Bruceswar wrote:

Crazy Mexican wrote:Is there any way to see the conquerors on a calendar, as in see the length of their reign’s?

or is there any way to get this info?
spankyou

Ask Blitz. He keeps track of things like that

here you go crazy mexican

Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...

Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...

indeed, way more

White Moose wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...

indeed, way more

at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)

demonfork wrote:

White Moose wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...

indeed, way more

at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)

I just forgot to update it, it was around early to mid april and I have around 100 games, think 101

Blitzaholic wrote:

demonfork wrote:

White Moose wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...

indeed, way more

at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)

I just forgot to update it, it was around early to mid april and I have around 100 games, think 101 now on July 20th

kh lost it on 8-14-09, so 101 + july 21 to 31st is 10 days, then august 1 to aug 13 is another 12 days , that's 22, so 101 + 22 = 123

1 karelpietertje 5963 5212 3259 (63%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.7 Netherlands Netherlands


# 17

Hah - none of these guys are ever going to beat Blitz' record of 170 days any time soon!

Nice list anyway

Blitzaholic wrote:for manbugalow to view as he was interested

Thank you very much

ManBungalow wrote:Hah - none of these guys are ever going to beat Blitz' record of 170 days any time soon!

Nice list anyway

Blitzaholic wrote:for manbugalow to view as he was interested

Thank you very much

you are welcome manbungalow and someone will pass it one day, all records are made to be broken, I just wanted them to be very challenging to break.

So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Sorry..i have to make a correction to your statement...when i got the first time conqueror i didnt get there by feestyle
I played at that time 90 % of single escalating games with topplayers like comic boy, scotty, blitzy, poo etc etc.
to raise up my topscore and to maintain in the top i idd used freestyle..because its almost not done to do it with sequantial game!

Hey Blitz....just letting you know, in case you forgot elementary school English, that an apostrophe means possession so there is no apostrophe in 'conquerors'......

Gilligan wrote:Hey Blitz....just letting you know, in case you forgot elementary school English, that an apostrophe means possession so there is no apostrophe in 'conquerors'......

no no no
its all im the implied word "Thread"

CC's 17 CONQUEROR's Thread

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Fact is that, even though the strategy in sequential teamgames or escalating games for instance is way more interesting than in freestyle 1v1, it is not possible to achieve a winning percentage of 99% in sequential, whereas this is very possible in freestyle 1v1.

I think the only thing that could possible be done about this is by separating the scoreboard into a freestyle and a sequential one, where every player has 2 separate scores.

however I don't see this happening any time soon, so I share your concerns.

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.

Time for congrats to karelpietertje again, back to Conqueror on a tied score of 5682. Is this the first dead-on tie at the top and what's the tie-breaker?
Reading the above posts, I guess lack must choose generosity of spirit above scatological humour.

King_Herpes wrote:

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.

Back again with the wit. There's no harm in imagining an age when the strongest tactics are where they should be- the very top of the scoreboard. You may have some people fooled (though I imagine it's simply because you are a "likable" fellow and people like to boost up their friends) but tactically you've never been a top player and never will be. I can stomach someone like sjnap maintaining conqueror through freestyle because he's actually a top 5 or 10 player unlike yourself. Well, anyway, you are right that it is probably a false hope but one can dream. Later.

prismsaber wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.

Back again with the wit. There's no harm in imagining an age when the strongest tactics are where they should be- the very top of the scoreboard. You may have some people fooled (though I imagine it's simply because you are a "likable" fellow and people like to boost up their friends) but tactically you've never been a top player and never will be. I can stomach someone like sjnap maintaining conqueror through freestyle because he's actually a top 5 or 10 player unlike yourself. Well, anyway, you are right that it is probably a false hope but one can dream. Later.

Hmm...well might we see the freestyle 1on1 merchants dropping back now with the elimination of the double turn rule?

Has the age of the seq. trips quads merchants returned?

Interesting times ahead I suspect.

(btw I am genuinely unclear about to what extent freestyle players - especially 1on1, 2on2 - relied on the double turn for those insane win rates)