Conquer Club

ManBungalow wrote:

Frop wrote:Zero tolerance. Severe punishments for every violation and more importantly putting them on display for the whole community to see (forum announcements, separate tag or icon next to their username, etc.). CC has to start getting the message out there that they won't allow anyone to ruin our gaming experience.

Absolutely
I like the idea that a warned player has an icon or something next to their name. That could work nicely. Maybe the player could have something next to their user-name for a few weeks after they are warned/banned etc. Or they could "work" it off, by playing properly? Although having to work it off may discourage people from playing...
I dunno :\

Actually it's supposed to work as a deterrent.

Frop wrote:

ManBungalow wrote:

Frop wrote:Zero tolerance. Severe punishments for every violation and more importantly putting them on display for the whole community to see (forum announcements, separate tag or icon next to their username, etc.). CC has to start getting the message out there that they won't allow anyone to ruin our gaming experience.

Absolutely
I like the idea that a warned player has an icon or something next to their name. That could work nicely. Maybe the player could have something next to their user-name for a few weeks after they are warned/banned etc. Or they could "work" it off, by playing properly? Although having to work it off may discourage people from playing...
I dunno :\

Actually it's supposed to work as a deterrent.

I see
It would be interesting to see if LackAttack approves of that
The chance of another $25 a year? Or making the gaming experience better?

ManBungalow wrote:

Frop wrote:

ManBungalow wrote:

Frop wrote:Zero tolerance. Severe punishments for every violation and more importantly putting them on display for the whole community to see (forum announcements, separate tag or icon next to their username, etc.). CC has to start getting the message out there that they won't allow anyone to ruin our gaming experience.

Absolutely
I like the idea that a warned player has an icon or something next to their name. That could work nicely. Maybe the player could have something next to their user-name for a few weeks after they are warned/banned etc. Or they could "work" it off, by playing properly? Although having to work it off may discourage people from playing...
I dunno :\

Actually it's supposed to work as a deterrent.

I see
It would be interesting to see if LackAttack approves of that
The chance of another $25 a year? Or making the gaming experience better?

I think Manbungalow has really got to the heart of the matter here.

Yep,I doubt Lack will approve any of these ideas,as they all put people off paying a subscription.Most internet gaming sites with paying members do not have forums where the users complain day in day out about the same old nonsence.
Multis can simply buy back a membership over and over.
We all see the price for cheating is simply $25. No other punishment need apply.
We do not need the walk of shame or the icon announcing us cheats.Just simply put $25 through paypal transaction and all is well.

I was unfairly blocked and I don't want anything labeling me a cheater after so long.

I made about 10 -2 player games and i forgot and pressed speed games ,it was to late when i found out they all snapped them up , i couldent keep up playing about 10 speed games i just give up in the end.

Frop wrote:

e_i_pi wrote:These players are completely 100% innocent:

36 games - [player]CaptainMoo[/player] - 348 points
25 games - [player]PiousMartyr[/player] - 210+ points (Map Rank only reports 18 games out of 25)
22 games - [player]tyche73[/player] - 173 points
13 games - [player]Ossenaar[/player] - 113 points
9 games - [player]TYRELL[/player] - 105 points
9 games - [player]lilwdlnddude[/player] - 214 points
8 games - [player]awesome T-Baby[/player]

This case has been left open for too long that what I can do right now is to note all these accounts mentioned here. If we get another point dumping case and one of these accounts are once again involved, we will deal with them immediately.

@ on the nose
Next time, be more careful or else.

king achilles wrote:

Frop wrote:

e_i_pi wrote:These players are completely 100% innocent:

36 games - [player]CaptainMoo[/player] - 348 points
25 games - [player]PiousMartyr[/player] - 210+ points (Map Rank only reports 18 games out of 25)
22 games - [player]tyche73[/player] - 173 points
13 games - [player]Ossenaar[/player] - 113 points
9 games - [player]TYRELL[/player] - 105 points
9 games - [player]lilwdlnddude[/player] - 214 points
8 games - [player]awesome T-Baby[/player]

This case has been left open for too long that what I can do right now is to note all these accounts mentioned here. If we get another point dumping case and one of these accounts are once again involved, we will deal with them immediately.

@ on the nose
Next time, be more careful or else.

What a lot of asolute nonsense. Your actions are those of a person desperate not to have to make a decision that will upset someone. You are guilty of abusing the position you hold. Why am I not surprised, I see your crass decisions day in and day out. Your stupidity in not seeing that you are steadily building a problem for yourself is legendary.

What happened to the rules this site has? How can you go round 'busting' when you only apply the rules when it suits you? Why should on the nose bother to take any heeed of your supposed threat, you obviously avoid any kind of confrontation. The players on the list OBVIOUSLY took advantage of the situation, but as usual in your vacuous, timid and weak fashion, you will let them off with what is obviously taking advantage of points dumping.

I would have sent this privately but in the past you squirm and wriggle over these kinds of issues so decided to do this publicly. As with most of the team here, you are nothing more than a pale imitation of what you should be, but then that example starts at the top.

Please answer this SIMPLE question. Do you think the players in this list took advantage of points dumping, so breaking the rule which clearly states:

The Rules wrote:Unwritten Rules

Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts.

I am fascinated to see how CaptainMoo who benefited by some 348 points cannot have been breaking this rule. I will be intrigued as to your response for the others on this list.

As I have said, this case was left too long ago that got overlooked for months. If ever a score reset should have been done, it should have been handed when this report was still fresh. Now that months have passed, these accounts have already earned a lot of points all this time. Taking that all away would be also unfair to them.

Fruitcake, better that you should know how the busting, score resets, etc goes before judging people. You act as if you know everything but you do not. You are free to post what you know to a certain extent and let it appear that what you say is what is already everything that is needed to know.

Anyway, as I have noted this, another administrator can always step in and take a look at this case once again.

Or you can always post how awful I am regardless, and how knowledgeable you are.

8 games - awesome T-Baby


Did he not just get in on the spaceghost games? How many times is this guy going to be allowed to take points from the dumpers? When is enough enough?