Conquer Club

What's more sad than the fact he raped under aged girls?
The fact that he's in some institution instead of being run through a wood chipper into a pen of pigs.

Wump wants to post it as his Avatar?
Good.
It makes this deformed sick f*ck less inconspicuous to those who will bat his knees on general principals if he ever walks around in public.


Offensive......Life is offensive, grow a sack and buy a helmet.


JRF

i can't help but think westlehump really IS this guy...


yee gads... stay away from me you little freak...

Robinette wrote:i can't help but think westlehump really IS this guy...

We have a winner!

Post of the day.

dividedbyzero wrote:

Robinette wrote:i can't help but think westlehump really IS this guy...

We have a winner!

Post of the day.

No Ump was that dude in his previous avatar...the one with the mohawk

alright at the request of a few users, who actually cared enough to pm me instead of trying to flame me or "claim bad moderating " i am moving this to not yet banned. If this turns into a flame fest of any kind it will be locked again.

owenshooter wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

I just saw it.

i am following tom around the forums for the joy of laughing at his clan sig...almost as good as blitz's whacked reflection in his thota sig!!-0

Well im glad you like to tag along with me like a bad smell, but im growing weary of you and your negativity. I would be quite surprised if toy have friends in the real world because to be honest i couldn't think of anyone in the right mind who would volunteer want to talk to that noob.

And to the spelling mistake in Leigion - ha - i did it to take the piss out of the legion, and make fun of LFAW (a friend on the site) (also a member of ++The Legion++).
So, if you dont mind and take a step back from being an arrgant ass hole, you might be able to see that a friend-friend relationship can also contain a joke!-t

p.s - if it means that much to you...i can make it be spelt right...but i wouldnt want you to get your own way, you're a big boy now, you should learn...

t-o-m wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

I just saw it.

i am following tom around the forums for the joy of laughing at his clan sig...almost as good as blitz's whacked reflection in his thota sig!!-0

Well im glad you like to tag along with me like a bad smell, but im growing weary of you and your negativity. I would be quite surprised if toy have friends in the real world because to be honest i couldn't think of anyone in the right mind who would volunteer want to talk to that noob.

And to the spelling mistake in Leigion - ha - i did it to take the piss out of the legion, and make fun of LFAW (a friend on the site) (also a member of ++The Legion++).
So, if you dont mind and take a step back from being an arrgant ass hole, you might be able to see that a friend-friend relationship can also contain a joke!-t

p.s - if it means that much to you...i can make it be spelt right...but i wouldnt want you to get your own way, you're a big boy now, you should learn...

Suck it up, princess!

Shatners Bassoon wrote:

1) He's a sex offender who raped underage girls.

I'm more disturbed by this fact over anything else.

It's not true.

t-o-m wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

I just saw it.

i am following tom around the forums for the joy of laughing at his clan sig...almost as good as blitz's whacked reflection in his thota sig!!-0

Well im glad you like to tag along with me like a bad smell, but im growing weary of you and your negativity. I would be quite surprised if toy have friends in the real world because to be honest i couldn't think of anyone in the right mind who would volunteer want to talk to that noob.

And to the spelling mistake in Leigion - ha - i did it to take the piss out of the legion, and make fun of LFAW (a friend on the site) (also a member of ++The Legion++).
So, if you dont mind and take a step back from being an arrgant ass hole, you might be able to see that a friend-friend relationship can also contain a joke!-t

p.s - if it means that much to you...i can make it be spelt right...but i wouldnt want you to get your own way, you're a big boy now, you should learn...

Oh I see. It was intentional.....

there seems to be a general opinion that the thread where we were discussing the avvy wrester1ump had of a sex offender should be allowed.

If this thread is handled in a good way, there should be no reason for it to be locked.

As hecter said, the personal information argument falls flat on its face because this freak is known throughout the internet. I guess whoever rapes underage girls should get internet fame. I don't give a shit what disease this guy has, sex offenders are all the same.

I find it very offensive, plus every time I see it, I gag.

I find it immensly hilarious.


Also, in before lock.

well very funny clapper, I just found the thread in chatter box.

jnd, you heavily misunderstood the whole thing.

A point of the avatar was how this guy LOOKS, his sexual offense has been totally irrelevant (except as a source of guy's picture).

What hecter did was routine trolling.

wump choose this avatar to provoke and he succeed - bunch of suckers swallowed his hook.

Result of this particular game:

wrestler1ump 1 : 0 CC community

sigh, and they tell me I should read a few minutes more into things? LOL merged with the other thread in the not yet banned where it belongs!

Zemljanin wrote:jnd, you heavily misunderstood the whole thing.

A point of the avatar was how this guy LOOKS, his sexual offense has been totally irrelevant (except as a source of guy's picture).

What hecter did was routine trolling.

wump choose this avatar to provoke and he succeed - bunch of suckers swallowed his hook.

Result of this particular game:

wrestler1ump 1 : 0 CC community

I hope the kid is happy. It seems like he needs the small victories. If that helps him sleep at night, then fine, he can take it.

And I do think that his sex abuse means something. You're saying that if there was a 9/11 hero that got badly hurt saving people got a messed up face in the ordeal. I GUARANTEE that there wouldn't be such an uproar.

Zemljanin wrote:jnd, you heavily misunderstood the whole thing.

A point of the avatar was how this guy LOOKS, his sexual offense has been totally irrelevant (except as a source of guy's picture).

What hecter did was routine trolling.

wump choose this avatar to provoke and he succeed - bunch of suckers swallowed his hook.

Result of this particular game:

wrestler1ump 1 : 0 CC community

Why hello there mr 200 poster and also a person with 2 medals.
You have no influence over any threads made - nor do you contribute to the general discussion of the topic.
f*ck off out of chatter box, zremlim: 0 | everyone: 1

Zemljanin wrote:jnd, you heavily misunderstood the whole thing.

A point of the avatar was how this guy LOOKS, his sexual offense has been totally irrelevant (except as a source of guy's picture).

What hecter did was routine trolling.

wump choose this avatar to provoke and he succeed - bunch of suckers swallowed his hook.

Result of this particular game:

wrestler1ump 1 : 0 CC community

If perhaps unattractive, I find nothing offensive with the way he looks. Now, explain how what I did was routine trolling.

t-o-m wrote:

Zemljanin wrote:jnd, you heavily misunderstood the whole thing.

A point of the avatar was how this guy LOOKS, his sexual offense has been totally irrelevant (except as a source of guy's picture).

What hecter did was routine trolling.

wump choose this avatar to provoke and he succeed - bunch of suckers swallowed his hook.

Result of this particular game:

wrestler1ump 1 : 0 CC community

Why hello there mr 200 poster and also a person with 2 medals.
You have no influence over any threads made - nor do you contribute to the general discussion of the topic.
f*ck off out of chatter box, zremlim: 0 | everyone: 1

Indeed. Your e-peen is not massive enough to give us a reason to listen to you. Our time is limited and we cannot allow mere newbies to infringe upon our godgiven time. Come back to us when your member is swollen enough for tom to listen to you.

Since whump made his debut on CC, he has screamed for attention and abuse. He does it with avatars, constant tattling to the mods on trivial matters, and general asinine behavior. The worst thing you can do to whump is ignore him. He needs abusive attention to sustain his lonely, sick existence.


Please don't feed the whump.
Honibaz

t-o-m wrote:Why hello there mr 200 poster and also a person with 2 medals.
You have no influence over any threads made - nor do you contribute to the general discussion of the topic.
f*ck off out of chatter box, zremlim: 0 | everyone: 1

Indeed. Your e-peen is not massive enough to give us a reason to listen to you. Our time is limited and we cannot allow mere newbies to infringe upon our godgiven time. Come back to us when your member is swollen enough for tom to listen to you.

It seems that t-o-m lives in his own universe, so I have no intention to interrupt him. Snorri addressed me using local slang I have never been obligated to understand.
So what I'm going to say now is not for them, but for all:

I'm a very rare guest in this sub-forum. jnd opened a new thread in GD, I judged him as an honest and benevolent poster, so I wanted to warn him that he's taking the issue way too seriously. However, jnd's thread was merged with this one very soon. If I predicted that, I probably wouldn't post.
But now, here we are. I'm partly involved and I am staying until I finish a discussion with reasonable posters. Apologies to the others - for this very offensive trespassing...

jnd94 wrote:And I do think that his sex abuse means something.

I'd appreciate if you elaborate this, at least a bit. For the beginning - do you actually know what offense he exactly did?
And comparison with wounded hero isn't really good. Wump chose a picture of a person with obvious disability. IMO, he had a precise goal. And he succeeded...

hecter wrote:If perhaps unattractive, I find nothing offensive with the way he looks. Now, explain how what I did was routine trolling.

Well, before getting a premium, I was reading this forum much more than today. And in old posts you demonstrated:
a) at least MENSA level intelligence
b) very good background education for your age
c) extremely liberal standpoints
d) tendency to provoke less subtle minds, making fun of it

And now you are trying to convince us that you're genuinely offended by involving some sexual offender, without even knowing (at least without saying to us) what kind of offense he did??? Very unconvincing to me...

I thought you wanted to add some fuel while staying out of crowd. So you chose guy's sexual offense as an excuse. That's trolling, IMHO...

My hypothesis might be wrong, but it seems very reasonable... So I still believe in it, until otherwise proven...

Now I know you must be lying...

Zemljanin wrote:

t-o-m wrote:Why hello there mr 200 poster and also a person with 2 medals.
You have no influence over any threads made - nor do you contribute to the general discussion of the topic.
f*ck off out of chatter box, zremlim: 0 | everyone: 1

Indeed. Your e-peen is not massive enough to give us a reason to listen to you. Our time is limited and we cannot allow mere newbies to infringe upon our godgiven time. Come back to us when your member is swollen enough for tom to listen to you.

It seems that t-o-m lives in his own universe, so I have no intention to interrupt him. Snorri addressed me using local slang I have never been obligated to understand.
So what I'm going to say now is not for them, but for all:

I'm a very rare guest in this sub-forum. jnd opened a new thread in GD, I judged him as an honest and benevolent poster, so I wanted to warn him that he's taking the issue way too seriously. However, jnd's thread was merged with this one very soon. If I predicted that, I probably wouldn't post.
But now, here we are. I'm partly involved and I am staying until I finish a discussion with reasonable posters. Apologies to the others - for this very offensive trespassing...

jnd94 wrote:And I do think that his sex abuse means something.

I'd appreciate if you elaborate this, at least a bit. For the beginning - do you actually know what offense he exactly did?
And comparison with wounded hero isn't really good. Wump chose a picture of a person with obvious disability. IMO, he had a precise goal. And he succeeded...

hecter wrote:If perhaps unattractive, I find nothing offensive with the way he looks. Now, explain how what I did was routine trolling.

Well, before getting a premium, I was reading this forum much more than today. And in old posts you demonstrated:
a) at least MENSA level intelligence
b) very good background education for your age
c) extremely liberal standpoints
d) tendency to provoke less subtle minds, making fun of it

And now you are trying to convince us that you're genuinely offended by involving some sexual offender, without even knowing (at least without saying to us) what kind of offense he did??? Very unconvincing to me...

I thought you wanted to add some fuel while staying out of crowd. So you chose guy's sexual offense as an excuse. That's trolling, IMHO...

My hypothesis might be wrong, but it seems very reasonable... So I still believe in it, until otherwise proven...

I did elaborate. Situation is everything. And a war hero is a great example. Both have tremendous disability, but a hero is a hero and a sex offender, no matter what specific offense he did is still a low life sack of shit.

I think wumps avy is his personal choice, and it should stay. wump has always shown who his personal role models and hero's are..that is why wump is so loved by CC

Apparently this guy was charged with "Gross Sexual Imposition" which is defined as unwilling sexual contact with one who is not one's spouse.

The dude allegedly groped a nurse (according to a statement by his brother, he was only trying to get her attention).

Time to put things in perspective. These harsh statements about him being a "sex offender" are a little over the top.

Hell, I could be charged with "Gross Sexual Imposition" several times a week if the chicks didn't dig me so much. If I wasn't so damned good looking, I'm sure I'd get at least an occasional negative response with all the ass grabbing I do.

But really, do your research before calling someone a "low life sack of shit". This guy is a far cry from a child molester and was probably a victim of miscommunication.

TheProwler wrote: If I actually came on to women instead of whump and my pugs, I'm sure I'd get at least an occasional negative response with all the ass grabbing I do.

Heh heh, the assprowler speaks.


Honibaz