[Official] Classic TOUCH-UP [Quenched]

Unit_2 · Post by **Unit_2** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:20 pm

Are you going to change the bonus that it is worth to the right amount?

i.e. Asia, Africa, Norht America, Etc.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:33 pm

Unit_2 wrote:Are you going to change the bonus that it is worth to the right amount?

i.e. Asia, Africa, Norht America, Etc.

They are the right amount...

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:03 am

wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.

Agree Fully.

wicked wrote:Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.

uhh... Agree on the small map, think the large map is fine.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:05 am

People, this is all the artist is allowed to do:

army circles
territory names
legends
border adjusting

and he/she can only adjust these in a visual way. We can not make any gameplay changes, we can't make any ascetic image changes. We can not make any major color changes.

So please, just focus on commenting on those 4, most of you are understanding this, but not everyone.

MrBenn · Post by **MrBenn** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:11 am

I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am

wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.

Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.

I agree with Wicked... (Not sure that's happened before :lol:

)

C.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:21 am

yeti_c wrote:
wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.

Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.

I agree with Wicked... (Not sure that's happened before )

C.

yes it's only blurry on the small map, but that's what over 90% of people use.

Also if the orange of Aussie can be tweaked ever so slightly, it'll make it stand out more from Asia. I'm pretty sure Lack would be ok with that minor color change. :wink:

tenio · Post by **tenio** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:03 pm

90% of the people use the small map? wow I can barley read the small map

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:06 pm

MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...

Again not possible under lacks veto.

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:05 am

gimil wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...

Again not possible under lacks veto.

The touchup author can try increasing the contrast IF it can be done easily.

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:31 am

lackattack wrote:
gimil wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...

Again not possible under lacks veto.

The touchup author can try increasing the contrast IF it can be done easily.

The man himself shows face

Ill be sure to let him know

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:22 am

Ah, can you move S. Europe a little to the left so it's more visible to know that Middle East and S. Europe touch?

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:59 pm

The quiet helper wrote:Fixes
-Orange Oceania
-Southern Europe white removed
-Southern Europe Border to Middle East attack line added
-Random numbers
-Fixed small version Oceania territory blur

Genghis Khan CA · Post by **Genghis Khan CA** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:10 pm

As someone who never thought the original classic map was THAT bad... I'd like to congratulate the touch-upper on a job well done - it looks fantastic!

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:43 pm

rebelman wrote:the orange numbering is almost impossible to read in western oz

was this comment ignored ?

actually could we see numbers on continents the same colour, this was a big problem in classic before touch up it would be great if it could be looked at as well

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:20 am

Again, I'd like to see the sea connections cleaned up a bit. They just look so blocky and jagged... Like stairs.

Lone.prophet · Post by **Lone.prophet** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:37 am

what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned

WidowMakers · Post by **WidowMakers** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:21 am

The text in QUEBEC for the large map still needs fixing. (edbeard pointed that out)

Lone.prophet wrote:what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned

They look virtually the same to me. I think the new map "looks" slightly brighter due to the army circles being lighter.

hecter wrote:Again, I'd like to see the sea connections cleaned up a bit. They just look so blocky and jagged... Like stairs.

They are the same between both maps. Does lack care? Connection lines were not on the list of fixes allowed. But I really don't see the harm in adding new blue lines.

EDIT: A new line between southern Europe and Middle east was added in the update. Makes sense to allow the other lines to get fixed as well. (Unless keeping them the same as the current map is OK)

WM

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:31 pm

Lone.prophet wrote:what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned

They are identical except for aus which has been made less saturated than before to increase the contrast between aus and asia.

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:25 pm

Lone.prophet's comment reminds me of someone who complained about how the colour of Africa became aweful when we tried to launch this the fist time. Africa's colour wasn't changed at all of course.

I like the new Oz orange.

let's leave the attack lines as is.

Lone.prophet · Post by **Lone.prophet** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:16 pm

well i really did see difference now i dont see it anymore LOL

Kaplowitz · Post by **Kaplowitz** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:24 pm

gimil wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!

Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto

I dont care about lackattack- who does he think he is? some kind of all powerful administrator or something?! :roll:

oh right

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:36 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:
gimil wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!

Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto

I dont care about lackattack- who does he think he is? some kind of all powerful administrator or something?!

oh right

Its alright, we all know twill is taking over

Post by **iancanton** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:23 pm

i'm having trouble distinguishing 3s from 8s in the army count, especially in dark blue. this also applies on the existing classic map. usually, it's pretty obvious which one it is if u're in the middle of a game. however, if the numbers suddenly appear in a fog game, then it might catch out a few people.

ian.

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:05 am

artist wrote:-I fixed Quebec text on the large map.
-Showing the worst color for each bonus group
-Show random colors
-XML

88's

XML Random Numbers

XML:
http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/6/15/ ... %20v4a.xml