Page 3 of 9
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:18 am
by Requim For A Win
So basically the kid is acting out at his mom because he hates his mom and thinks feminists are shit
which is the exact opposite of what she wants him to do
Which is leading nowwhere.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:21 am
by hulmey
ambrose are you on another planet??
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:30 am
by OnlyAmbrose
hulmey wrote:ambrose are you on another planet??
Please, explain to me how western culture throughout the ages has revolved around the ideal of survival of the fittest?
John Locke. Dante Alighieri. Moliere. Shakespeare. Thomas Jefferson. Abraham Lincoln. Leonardo Da Vinci. Jesus of Nazareth. Michaelangelo. Richard the Lionheart. Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Pillars of western civilization. All of them believed in something a great deal more than survival of the fittest.
Locke believed in the sacred nature of a right to property. Dante believed in a constant spiritual journey. Moliere believed in honesty with oneself. Shakespeare believed in love. Jefferson believed in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Abraham Lincoln believed that fourscore and seven years before he made the emancipation proclamation the founding fathers believed in a great ideal. Leonardo Da Vinci believed in a curious mind. Jesus of Nazareth believed in selfless giving of all one has. Michaelangelo believed in the power of art. Richard the Lionheart believed in courage and honorable combat. Franklin Roosevelt believed in good and evil.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:00 am
by EvilPurpleMonkey
I must say these feminazis piss me off. I myself am a feminist, but there is a line where you go from equality to superiority, and feminazis break that line. They demand special protections and liberties that men don't have, twisting the true feminist ideology of being just as capable as men. She says that pornography is degrading to women, eh? You know what, being a porn star is an occupation, not slavery. They aren't forced into it. I bet the women looks at male or female pornography, but if she's looking at a man or a lesbian it's not degrading? And if someone watches porn they become a rapist? Funny that, 80 percent of the male population aren't rapists, not even 20% are. And saying she should have had a abortion just becuase her son watches porn, that's a disgusting reason. The only problem with her son is the amount of porn he looks at.
And then there's discipline. I would actually like it if kids could be smacked if they broke the rules. But then it's complicated by social services and now we have a generation of kids who think they can do whatever the hell they want. But not for something like watching porn, it's natural for teenagers to look at porn.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:07 am
by Hitman079
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:And then there's discipline. I would actually like it if kids could be smacked if they broke the rules. But then it's complicated by social services and now we have a generation of kids who think they can do whatever the hell they want. But not for something like watching porn, it's natural for teenagers to look at porn.
yes, but there's a time when you overdo it, as others (i believe hecter) have said. if you can't go on the computer without looking at porn, that's not an indication of lust as it occurs often but it's of self control. if the son knows that looking at porn is wrong, he should try to combat his problem. looking at porn is bad, but not as bad as the mother perceives it to be. maybe porn does have an influence, maybe it doesn't, but let's ask the kind of guys who take the "f*ck 'em and leave 'em" principle with women in general.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:21 am
by hulmey
Ambrose we are able to appreciate the things that you are mentioning because the Western World has survide to be the fittest race...
For example look at the Black Race and im saying majority here. Look at their culture. They have brought nothing to the world apart from Hip Hop and Bling.
The west has a truly greater culture and by West that is not including America!!!1
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:18 am
by EvilPurpleMonkey
Hitman079 wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:And then there's discipline. I would actually like it if kids could be smacked if they broke the rules. But then it's complicated by social services and now we have a generation of kids who think they can do whatever the hell they want. But not for something like watching porn, it's natural for teenagers to look at porn.
yes, but there's a time when you overdo it, as others (i believe hecter) have said. if you can't go on the computer without looking at porn, that's not an indication of lust as it occurs often but it's of self control. if the son knows that looking at porn is wrong, he should try to combat his problem. looking at porn is bad, but not as bad as the mother perceives it to be. maybe porn does have an influence, maybe it doesn't, but let's ask the kind of guys who take the "f*ck 'em and leave 'em" principle with women in general.
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I must say these feminazis piss me off. I myself am a feminist, but there is a line where you go from equality to superiority, and feminazis break that line......The only problem with her son is the amount of porn he looks at.
Obviously if you can't go on the internet without looking at porn there's a real problem. And if it's not an addiction I really doubt it has a negative impact, except for over zealous tissue consumption.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:29 am
by b.k. barunt
People addicted to porn eat tissues? I'd have to say thats a negative impact.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:35 am
by Stopper
hulmey wrote:Ambrose we are able to appreciate the things that you are mentioning because the Western World has survide to be the fittest race...
For example look at the Black Race and im saying majority here. Look at their culture. They have brought nothing to the world apart from Hip Hop and Bling.
The west has a truly greater culture and by West that is not including America!!!1
Is that "1" there intended to show that this post is satirical?
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:43 am
by EvilPurpleMonkey
b.k. barunt wrote:People addicted to porn eat tissues? I'd have to say thats a negative impact.
Consumption means use of, not necessarily eat.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:47 am
by Stopper
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:People addicted to porn eat tissues? I'd have to say thats a negative impact.
Consumption means use of, not necessarily eat.
I think you missed the rather fantastic play on the word "impact".
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 am
by btownmeggy
Stopper wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:People addicted to porn eat tissues? I'd have to say thats a negative impact.
Consumption means use of, not necessarily eat.
I think you missed the rather fantastic play on the word "impact".

Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:39 am
by OnlyAmbrose
hulmey wrote:Ambrose we are able to appreciate the things that you are mentioning because the Western World has survide to be the fittest race...
So it turns out that the culture that believes in things beyond survival of the fittest winds up being the fittest.
Perhaps you could learn something from that.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:51 am
by b.k. barunt
Game, set, match.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:14 pm
by cawck mongler
OnlyAmbrose wrote:cawck mongler wrote:in western nations its easier to survive and reproduce then anywhere else, and thats arguably our only function in life.
You'd find that historically and presently, the very western culture you're referring to has disagreed with that statement.
If you're referring to the great thinkers mentioned in your other post (btw Lincoln shouldn't be on there), then that's a very small portion of the population who're well off.
Its a fact that surviving and reproducing are part of our instincts, you can't compare your instincts to ideals, as not everyone shares the same ones and they all sort of tie into our other instincts anyways (like compassion and all that). Any culture that forced you to give up all your possessions would be fine by Ghandis standards, but hell for everyone else, so technically (the other guys being technical, not me) you can really only judge a culture by how easy it is to carry out our instincts.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:32 pm
by MeDeFe
So... the best culture would be an utter lack of culture? Where we really live like animals, relying only on our instincts and following their every urge. That's what you are proposing when you say that the best culture is the one where it's easiest to "carry out ones instincts".
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:01 pm
by cawck mongler
You're a moron, how would living like animals make it easier to survive? Technology and a system of laws and all that gives us a much better chance of survival.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:11 pm
by Dancing Mustard
I tried to read this thread, but I got bored and went to look at porn before it finished.
Anyway, I've got to go now, my mum is behind me shouting something about 'raping moomins'; stupid bitch...
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:56 pm
by muy_thaiguy
Still stand by my first comment on this thread...
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:10 pm
by MeDeFe
cawck mongler wrote:You're a moron, how would living like animals make it easier to survive? Technology and a system of laws and all that gives us a much better chance of survival.
Those things also force us to control our instincts and primal urges. I'm thinking you want to have your cake and eat it at the same time, as the saying goes.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:23 pm
by heavycola
that radical womyn inside of me
hehehe
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:29 pm
by hecter
"Feminazi" is actually a word, defined by urban dictionary. It has nothing to do with the eradication of a certain group of "pyples" either, btown!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feminazi
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:10 pm
by Stopper
By Christ, that's missing the point.
Hecter, the word "Nazi" is extremely pejorative and emotive, for obvious reasons. People often deliberately use the word (a more commonly abused word is "fascist" - cf "Islamo-fascism") to try and create a false association between those they don't like, and the Nazi Party of Germany.
I'm assuming you don't think the woman in the original post deserves to be bracketed with Hitler.
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:21 pm
by cawck mongler
Hitler was a genius and accomplished more then she ever could in a million years. She's a nobody.
Adolf Hitler>Psycho Feminazi Bitch
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:23 pm
by Stopper
cawck mongler= effete troll