Rank Insignias

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: CHANGE Rank Designators

Post by Qwert »

You have" new ranks" ;) topic
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: CHANGE Rank Designators

Post by Thezzaruz »

qwert wrote:You have" new ranks" ;) topic


We know, it was linked to that thread within a few hours. And that being 5 days ago I don't see your need for a bump...
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

I'm very new here, But just a suggestion.....I'm a military member, and the rank structure is very confusing to someone actually used to real military rank. Silver is a higher rank than gold, not the other way around, which you have. The rank you have for cadet is actualyl a Lieutenant rank, and the rank you have for Lieutenant is actually a Major or Lt. Col. The rank you have for Brigadiar is actually the rank of a Colonel, and the rank you have for General is acually just a Briggadiar general.

I know it'd take a lot to change it, and people are used to it this way, but for anyone with military experience, it can be confusing.
User avatar
The Neon Peon
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm
Gender: Male

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by The Neon Peon »

Well, lets just say this is not the army for a reason.
User avatar
Stephan Wayne
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: EAST TN

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by Stephan Wayne »

hell i think it just looks fancier the higher you go
no other reasons be hide it or maybe lack did not want to get suided by the army as well
User avatar
BaldAdonis
Posts: 2334
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:57 am
Location: Trapped in Pleasantville with Toby McGuire

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by BaldAdonis »

flyboy86 wrote:I'm very new here, But just a suggestion.....I'm a military member, and the rank structure is very confusing to someone actually used to real military rank. Silver is a higher rank than gold, not the other way around, which you have. The rank you have for cadet is actualyl a Lieutenant rank, and the rank you have for Lieutenant is actually a Major or Lt. Col. The rank you have for Brigadiar is actually the rank of a Colonel, and the rank you have for General is acually just a Briggadiar general.

I know it'd take a lot to change it, and people are used to it this way, but for anyone with military experience, it can be confusing.

Silver's not higher than gold, just a different member (paying vs. not).
It doesn't take much to change, and the ranks have gone through a few changes already to bring them to where they are. There was a thread a while back with the suggestion for a lot more ranks, as well as images to go along with them. Have a look for that if you're interested. But from what I understand, they're not meant to reflect military ranks, just to borrow things that look cool (I mean, is there a rank that gives you a crown?)
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

I know its not 100% military, but its very close. All the descriptions are definitely militray, and the insignias that go along with them do not match at all. A lieutenant should have a single bar, a captain should have two bars, a major should have the oak leaf, a colonel is an eagle, and generals are stars. Also, the premium memberships vs. free seems a little backwards. For example if you're a cadet with a premium membership its a gold bar, which in the military that is a lower rank than a silver bar which is the insignia for a free membership. Its just very conflicting from what I see at work every day lol
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by hecter »

Well, this isn't the US ranking system, it's the CC one... I kinda like it this way. The better you get, the fancier it gets.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
porkenbeans
Posts: 2546
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by porkenbeans »

flyboy86 wrote:I'm very new here, But just a suggestion.....I'm a military member, and the rank structure is very confusing to someone actually used to real military rank. Silver is a higher rank than gold, not the other way around, which you have. The rank you have for cadet is actualyl a Lieutenant rank, and the rank you have for Lieutenant is actually a Major or Lt. Col. The rank you have for Brigadiar is actually the rank of a Colonel, and the rank you have for General is acually just a Briggadiar general.

I know it'd take a lot to change it, and people are used to it this way, but for anyone with military experience, it can be confusing.
Something like my sig. ?
Image
User avatar
The Neon Peon
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm
Gender: Male

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by The Neon Peon »

flyboy86 wrote:I know its not 100% military, but its very close. All the descriptions are definitely militray, and the insignias that go along with them do not match at all. A lieutenant should have a single bar, a captain should have two bars, a major should have the oak leaf, a colonel is an eagle, and generals are stars. Also, the premium memberships vs. free seems a little backwards. For example if you're a cadet with a premium membership its a gold bar, which in the military that is a lower rank than a silver bar which is the insignia for a free membership. Its just very conflicting from what I see at work every day lol

Once again, THIS IS NOT THE MILITARY. If you want to see military ranks, I suggest you enlist again. (or for a longer period of time). Some of the names were taken because there are no other good forms of ranks to use.
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

porkenbeans wrote:
flyboy86 wrote:I'm very new here, But just a suggestion.....I'm a military member, and the rank structure is very confusing to someone actually used to real military rank. Silver is a higher rank than gold, not the other way around, which you have. The rank you have for cadet is actualyl a Lieutenant rank, and the rank you have for Lieutenant is actually a Major or Lt. Col. The rank you have for Brigadiar is actually the rank of a Colonel, and the rank you have for General is acually just a Briggadiar general.

I know it'd take a lot to change it, and people are used to it this way, but for anyone with military experience, it can be confusing.
Something like my sig. ?


yes!!
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

The Neon Peon wrote:
flyboy86 wrote:I know its not 100% military, but its very close. All the descriptions are definitely militray, and the insignias that go along with them do not match at all. A lieutenant should have a single bar, a captain should have two bars, a major should have the oak leaf, a colonel is an eagle, and generals are stars. Also, the premium memberships vs. free seems a little backwards. For example if you're a cadet with a premium membership its a gold bar, which in the military that is a lower rank than a silver bar which is the insignia for a free membership. Its just very conflicting from what I see at work every day lol

Once again, THIS IS NOT THE MILITARY. If you want to see military ranks, I suggest you enlist again. (or for a longer period of time). Some of the names were taken because there are no other good forms of ranks to use.


first of all don't assume I'm enlisted.

I'm not suggesting using the US military ranks completely, but the fact is that you have already chosen to use both the names and insignias of the US military, and its very odd that the name doesn't match the insignia. For example why do you have the insignia of a Major for a Lieutenant? And a Lieutenant for a Cadet? And a Colonel for a Brigadiar general?
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by Timminz »

The owner/creator of the site is Canadian. We don't know shit about military. ;)
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by MrBenn »

BaldAdonis wrote:...There was a thread a while back with the suggestion for a lot more ranks, as well as images to go along with them. Have a look for that if you're interested. But from what I understand, they're not meant to reflect military ranks, just to borrow things that look cool (I mean, is there a rank that gives you a crown?)

This one :arrow: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=47578
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by MrBenn »

flyboy86 wrote:...A lieutenant should have a single bar, a captain should have two bars, a major should have the oak leaf, a colonel is an eagle, and generals are stars...

Did you realise that different countries had different insignia? :arrow: http://www.morh.hr/osrh/data/comp/all_ranks.jpg
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

MrBenn wrote:
flyboy86 wrote:...A lieutenant should have a single bar, a captain should have two bars, a major should have the oak leaf, a colonel is an eagle, and generals are stars...

Did you realise that different countries had different insignia? :arrow: http://www.morh.hr/osrh/data/comp/all_ranks.jpg


yes, I understand that different countries have different insignias, of course. I'm an officer in the US military, of course I know that. The fact of the matter though, is that this site chose to use both the names and insignias of US military ranks. The only thing I'm pointing out is that the name doesn't match the insignia.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by MrBenn »

I'll concede the point that the names and insignia are a bit of a mish-mash. Personally I'd prefer the ranks to make more progressive sense, and I'm an advocate of increasing the number of ranks... having said that, it would appear to be a bit of a dead duck suggestion, judging from the general lack of support.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by Night Strike »

I think the purpose of the ranks are designed to borrow pictures and terms from the US military, but purposefully mix and match them so it doesn't appear to be copied from any one nation. People from around the world play on this site, so there's not much of a reason to push the US military on even more people. ;)
Image
User avatar
SuicidalSnowman
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:40 am
Gender: Male

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by SuicidalSnowman »

flyboy wrote:first of all don't assume I'm enlisted.


flyboy wrote:I'm an officer in the US military, of course I know that.


#-o
User avatar
porkenbeans
Posts: 2546
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by porkenbeans »

If the ranks were acorns and jellybeans, I dont think he would have any problems with them. Its that they are in fact miss-matched US military ensignas and ranks. -His grip is legitimate.
Image
lancehoch
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by lancehoch »

porkenbeans wrote:If the ranks were acorns and jellybeans, I dont think he would have any problems with them. Its that they are in fact miss-matched US military ensignas and ranks. -His grip is legitimate.

I believe lack has said in the past that it was not based at all on the American military.
flyboy86
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:29 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by flyboy86 »

I am by no means pushing the US military. The site creators CHOSE to use CLEARLY use US military rank and insignias. Thats great, fine. My only problem is that they mix-matched the name with the insignia. Its like using a picture of a banana, but calling it an apple, then using a picture of an orange, but calling it a grape.
User avatar
porkenbeans
Posts: 2546
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by porkenbeans »

lancehoch wrote:
porkenbeans wrote:If the ranks were acorns and jellybeans, I dont think he would have any problems with them. Its that they are in fact miss-matched US military ensignas and ranks. -His grip is legitimate.

I believe lack has said in the past that it was not based at all on the American military.
I dont give a crap what he said. They are Us military, just miss-matched.
Image
lancehoch
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by lancehoch »

porkenbeans wrote:I dont give a crap what he said. They are Us military, just miss-matched.

Well, he kinda runs the site, so what he says is just a tad bit important.
User avatar
keiths31
Posts: 2202
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:41 pm
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario

Re: The rank structure is very confusing

Post by keiths31 »

The symbols used are used by many Forces around the world other than the USA. They are not USA exclusive.

I wouldn't get too upset or worried about the ranks and names. If we did I could say the Crown used shouldn't be used for a Colonel but for a Warrant Officer...the Cadet bar is actually for a 2nd Lieutenant...and the Sword should be accompanied by a Crown for a Brigadier-General, instead of Major and Colonel respectivly.

The system used on CC is arbitrary...nothing to get worked up about. CC is based "loosely" on war and military...and the ranks are also based "loosely" on military ranks.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”