Conquer Club

mtamburini wrote:Id like to lynch someone just to find out what kind of roles we have, but odds are we will hit a townie so I choose to Unvote Vote no lynch

Bad idea and many would call it scummy to suggest it this early. Your a new player correct?

A no lynch would only help mafia especially if it is a 2 goon 5 VT scenario, which I pray is not the case.

Iron Butterfly wrote:

mtamburini wrote:Id like to lynch someone just to find out what kind of roles we have, but odds are we will hit a townie so I choose to Unvote Vote no lynch

Bad idea and many would call it scummy to suggest it this early. Your a new player correct?

A no lynch would only help mafia especially if it is a 2 goon 5 VT scenario, which I pray is not the case.

This early is scummy, but a no lynch in general is probably more beneficial to the town than a lynch right now so we can survive longer...

Obviously a no lynch benefits mafia, but odds are you will lynch an innocent over a mafia. Is that something you want to risk? especially if there is only 1 goon?

mtamburini wrote:Obviously a no lynch benefits mafia, but odds are you will lynch an innocent over a mafia. Is that something you want to risk? especially if there is only 1 goon?

A one goon game is to our benefit.

So odds are we have that, so why not not lynch and see what happens. Maybe if we have a cop they can better tell us about the people in our neighbourhood.

gregwolf121 wrote:epic pie we need something from you

well lets make it easy, just vote epic pie because hes not saying anything? rather kill him then wait till he gets mod-killed and we have to look for replacements... lets give him bit more time, but know what to do if he does not respond..

virus90 wrote:

gregwolf121 wrote:epic pie we need something from you

well lets make it easy, just vote epic pie because hes not saying anything? rather kill him then wait till he gets mod-killed and we have to look for replacements... lets give him bit more time, but know what to do if he does not respond..

Where's the vote?

VOTE COUNT

JamesKer1 - (1) - The Weird One
epic pie - (1) - gregwolf121
Iron Butterfly - (1) - virus90
The Weird One - (1) - JamesKer1
No Lynch - (1) - mtamburini

Not Voting: Iron Butterfly, Epic pie

With 7 alive it takes 5 to lynch

virus90 wrote:

gregwolf121 wrote:epic pie we need something from you

well lets make it easy, just vote epic pie because hes not saying anything? rather kill him then wait till he gets mod-killed and we have to look for replacements... lets give him bit more time, but know what to do if he does not respond..

i dislike lynching inactives one because it means there are some, and inactives really drag games down, that being said right now epic's my main lynch candidate because we haven't heard from him and i haven't gotten any major scum vibes from anybody else

Could we possibly get a prod for epic pie? If he doesn't respond, I'm all for putting some pressure to get him out here...or to just off an inactive, though I agree with greg that that is not ideal.

greg or Two explain to me how being inactive as Epic is would make him flip mafia. Seeing how both of you don't want to lynch him but will. The idea is to lynch someone we know or suspect is mafia. This is not the case with Epic. You wish to lynch him because he "bringing down the game"

I just remembered I signed up for this game. Sorry for inactivity. Reading back-posts now, will edit after.

Ok, right now all I'm seeing is a few people want to have a no-lynch. With the most pessimistic possibility, a no lynch will leave us with a third of the players Mafia. From here, it is insanely easy for them to win; if one of the goons doesn't get lynched (which is most likely), and they get a night kill on Night 2, then they win right there. A no-lynch is a sure way for us to lose.

Currently, James and mtam are the most scummy (aside from my inactivity), but that could just be inexperience.

Iron Butterfly wrote:greg or Two explain to me how being inactive as Epic is would make him flip mafia. Seeing how both of you don't want to lynch him but will. The idea is to lynch someone we know or suspect is mafia. This is not the case with Epic. You wish to lynch him because he "bringing down the game"

it wouldn't of necessity make him flip mafia, but mafia have been known to lay low, so it could be that, but inactives don't help town either, and on day one where we don't have very much to go on lynching an inactive may have given us an idea of what roles were in the game. but this is all moot now cause epic has shown up

epic pie wrote:I just remembered I signed up for this game. Sorry for inactivity. Reading back-posts now, will edit after.

i assume you mean that you will post after rereading, editing your posts is against the rules

My bad, re-posted.

Ok, right now all I'm seeing is a few people want to have a no-lynch. With the most pessimistic possibility, a no lynch will leave us with a third of the players Mafia. From here, it is insanely easy for them to win; if one of the goons doesn't get lynched (which is most likely), and they get a night kill on Night 2, then they win right there. A no-lynch is a sure way for us to lose.

Currently, James and mtam are the most scummy (aside from my inactivity), but that could just be inexperience.

Shall we find out other peoples roles are? As it is the only way to figure out what set we have and if there are 1 or 2 goons here.

You can't really trust a roleclaim.

So we expect to randomly lynch on day 1 to win?

mtamburini wrote:So we expect to randomly lynch on day 1 to win?

Not generally, no. A no lynch is generally not favoured because it gives us far less information.

Fair enough unvote

Got some feelings but before Iron Butterfly incidently gets kicked out because of the day 1 joke of mine, i will unvote for now. Think its not smart to post every hunch because it looks scummy right ?

epic pie wrote:I just remembered I signed up for this game. Sorry for inactivity. Reading back-posts now, will edit after.

Ok, right now all I'm seeing is a few people want to have a no-lynch. With the most pessimistic possibility, a no lynch will leave us with a third of the players Mafia. From here, it is insanely easy for them to win; if one of the goons doesn't get lynched (which is most likely), and they get a night kill on Night 2, then they win right there. A no-lynch is a sure way for us to lose.

Currently, James and mtam are the most scummy (aside from my inactivity), but that could just be inexperience.

For the record, editing a post is a no-no. Friendly reminder to please not do it again

Yep, got it. I'm used to forums where it is forbidden to double-post, at all times. Won't happen again.

epic pie wrote:Currently, James and mtam are the most scummy (aside from my inactivity), but that could just be inexperience.

WHAT!?! I was trying so hard no to do it this game... What'd I do wrong? Please point it out...

Not a lot, just agreeing with the no-lynch. Easy mistake for a beginner. I also had misread your post:

It could very well be best for a no lynch. However, we do need to wait a little bit before making that decision, as something important could come up during today.

; and the quotes you had in it. I though you were actually saying that you wanted to not lynch anyone, I should have said virus instead of you.

virus90 wrote:

mtamburini wrote:I don't think well get a lynch today. I think after the nights events we will have a better understanding of what's going on.

first mafia game online, is it in our interest not to lynch someone? or are we just 1 man down and no further if we go into the night and not kill someone?

dont see me agreeing to a no lynch in my opinion epic pie, just publicly asking what would be beneficial about it.