Conquer Club

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......

comic boy wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......

The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category
As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ?
What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.

stoicbird wrote:

comic boy wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......

The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category
As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ?
What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.

Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.

Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?

stoicbird wrote:

john9blue wrote:i think AAFitz was joking... you can never really be sure with him, though.

I've heard Americans using the term "sand diggers" to describe Arabs in the past. Maybe he thinks I'm implying something along those lines. I didn't intend that but he can read into it what he likes (it seems he's on his own planet so who cares what he thinks). The guy must be 60ish if his father fought in WWII so I can understand his propensity to whine at everything. Bless him.

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

AAFitz wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

john9blue wrote:i think AAFitz was joking... you can never really be sure with him, though.

I've heard Americans using the term "sand diggers" to describe Arabs in the past. Maybe he thinks I'm implying something along those lines. I didn't intend that but he can read into it what he likes (it seems he's on his own planet so who cares what he thinks). The guy must be 60ish if his father fought in WWII so I can understand his propensity to whine at everything. Bless him.

Thanks John, of course it was a joke.

Id say you dont have a sense of humor stoic, but you are calling me a whiner in a thread where you are bashing an entire religion, their people based on their religions beliefs, and suggesting outlawing that religion outright.

My joke was kind of funny, from my point of view, but you sir, are fucking hysterical.

stoicbird wrote:Think about it.

stoicbird wrote:

comic boy wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......

The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category
As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ?
What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.

Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.

Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?

comic boy wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

comic boy wrote:

stoicbird wrote:

oVo wrote:

stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).

Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group,
so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?

It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law.
Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered
by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.

Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.

Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......

The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category
As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ?
What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.

Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.

Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?

You appear to have dodged the question so I will ask once again , do you think Egypt , Libya , Tunisia and Syria are Islamic states ? As for the remainder of my post I shall account for your imbecility by dumbing down the point I was making , now read carefully; As Certain groups of Hindus and Christians have recently been responsible for atrocities then should these religions also be banned , or should just Islam be singled out ?

stoicbird wrote: I can talk gibberish.

AAFitz wrote:
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.

Should Christianity also be outlawed?

2dimes wrote:

AAFitz wrote:
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.

Should Christianity also be outlawed?

It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.

chang50 wrote:

2dimes wrote:

AAFitz wrote:
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.

Should Christianity also be outlawed?

It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.

Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..

2dimes wrote:

chang50 wrote:

2dimes wrote:

AAFitz wrote:
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.

Should Christianity also be outlawed?

It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.

Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..

Sad, why?

chang50 wrote:

2dimes wrote:

chang50 wrote:

2dimes wrote:

AAFitz wrote:
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.

Should Christianity also be outlawed?

It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.

Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..

Sad, why?

Just seems absurd to me to kill someone for their opinions on such an intangible matter.Of course a more Marxist position would be that all disputes are ultimately economic,and religion among others is used merely as a pretext.