General Brock II wrote:Queen Elizabeth isn't responsible for Canada's policy, but as "Head of State," she could theoretically refuse (through her representative) to allow any legislation to be enacted. For some unfortunate reason, she hasn't exercised that power... However, the Queen is more powerful in England than you think... Ever wondered about the private meetings she's had with the Prime Minister, and then sudden changes in policy? hmmm....
Theoretically is a pretty key word there, ya know. What do you think would happen if the Queen went 'no thank you, we'll do it my way'? She'd immediately be deposed as head of state. It's the same in the UK: technically, every single law that goes through Parliament has to be approved by the Queen. But good luck to the Queen trying to prevent a law being passed.
I'm no more concerned about the lobbying power of the royal family (one of the UK's largest land owners) than I am the lobbying power of corporations.
jonh9blue: you cede that the UK having a disproportionate amount of universities at the top of the league table is not evidence of a sneaky bias, then?


